"And I'm now quite sure that the Social Media Ops are tailoring messages to create illusions for each group."
Yes I think the sophistication of the technological entrainment (not merely messaging, but broadcasts that trick the body into false resonance, eliminating our natural BS meters) might be one of the most under-appreciated aspects of Covid PSYOP
Mystification is where the trance/brain washing starts. Find a mystified person or if you can mystify one, you have a perfect set up/victim for BS. Its systemic in this society. Especially since there are an estimated 167 million addicts of one kind or another, Addiction and mystification go hand in hand.
I have an example on this from e.g. neurology. 5 patients a day showing up with new-onset incontinence (minor inconvenience) and numb legs, most 4x vaccinated, often accompanied by blood anomalies. Spinal tap, labs, infusions, hospital stay... As a patient, this will seem like an adequate process to arrive at a definitive diagnosis and appropriate treatment.
Here's the thing. To differentiate between Guillain-Barré and other more common neurological issues (each with their own treatment strategies), you have to check one extra box on the lab request form for the spinal fluid that you took. Depending on the standards of the workplace, that test is not performed if patients have a known neurlogical condition (increasingly common with age), despite them being more prone to the autoimmune background of GB. So even the experts getting their fingers wet with spinal fluid have zero information about actual adverse events (and may consequently be missing out on a goldmine of data). '100% of new-onset incontinence due to pre-existing condition'.
From the perspective of statistics and data science, we are disappointed to not have the numbers. From the perspective of patients, diapers is disappointing, especially if prompt treatment for GB could have reversed it.
Are the injected slowly awakening?
A few:
https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/dialogue-with-a-curious-injectee-928/comment/7893550
Man I wish I could get some good data on this.
It's impossible to even get numbers on actual adverse events and cases and deaths, much less attitudes.
And I'm now quite sure that the Social Media Ops are tailoring messages to create illusions for each group.
"And I'm now quite sure that the Social Media Ops are tailoring messages to create illusions for each group."
Yes I think the sophistication of the technological entrainment (not merely messaging, but broadcasts that trick the body into false resonance, eliminating our natural BS meters) might be one of the most under-appreciated aspects of Covid PSYOP
Very sharp insight, Kathleen. Concur.
So many ways to mess with a human...
Mystification is where the trance/brain washing starts. Find a mystified person or if you can mystify one, you have a perfect set up/victim for BS. Its systemic in this society. Especially since there are an estimated 167 million addicts of one kind or another, Addiction and mystification go hand in hand.
I have an example on this from e.g. neurology. 5 patients a day showing up with new-onset incontinence (minor inconvenience) and numb legs, most 4x vaccinated, often accompanied by blood anomalies. Spinal tap, labs, infusions, hospital stay... As a patient, this will seem like an adequate process to arrive at a definitive diagnosis and appropriate treatment.
Here's the thing. To differentiate between Guillain-Barré and other more common neurological issues (each with their own treatment strategies), you have to check one extra box on the lab request form for the spinal fluid that you took. Depending on the standards of the workplace, that test is not performed if patients have a known neurlogical condition (increasingly common with age), despite them being more prone to the autoimmune background of GB. So even the experts getting their fingers wet with spinal fluid have zero information about actual adverse events (and may consequently be missing out on a goldmine of data). '100% of new-onset incontinence due to pre-existing condition'.
From the perspective of statistics and data science, we are disappointed to not have the numbers. From the perspective of patients, diapers is disappointing, especially if prompt treatment for GB could have reversed it.
Are we following these babies to see if they are okay? I am worried that they might be
not quite okay in a way that might not show until later and they are grown...
Yes, I fear there may be reproductive damage (especially to the eggs of girls) that won't become apparent until they attempt to conceive.