370 Comments

As an aspiring grandparent myself, I had the disappointment of 2 early miscarriages from my daughter n law. She was boosted. She nor her doctors thought the Vax was to blame. I had a strong Vax suspicion. The 3rd pregnancy is now 15 weeks, and so far so good. Now, I am concerned that she will take the new booster in the Fall. She is convinced the mRNA vaccines are safe and effective.

Expand full comment

Most relevant personal comment -- pinned

Expand full comment

Show her Igor's articles and ask her to explain the drop in birth rates in highly vaxxed countries.

Expand full comment

To my opinion, it is much more about the purpose of life. These people were somehow brainwashed their pupose of life is to be vaccinated.

Expand full comment

She, like the Humphrey Bogart character Rick in Casablanca, is misinformed.

Expand full comment

Early miscarriages happen a lot. Anyway it seems to me 1 SAE per 5000 jabs is far from safe and effective.

Expand full comment

So sorry you are in this situation. I am also an aspiring grandparent. My youngest and her husband took the jab and booster, she because she wanted to travel to South Africa for a volunteer opportunity, he because the Army made him. They don't seem to be in any hurry to have kids, and they are not interested in any information I present on the dangers of the jabs. She has told me it is straining our relationship. I want to tell her that if I saw a train barreling down on her, I would want to get her off the tracks! This is no different. My older daughter also is double-jabbed but not likely to get more. She is not currently in a relationship. Praying your daughter wises up! Check out Dr Victor Coleman's short book, *Anyone Who Tells You Vaccines are Safe and Effective is Lying.* Applies to ALL Vaccines, important to know before she has the baby. Also give her Dr. Paul Thomas's book, *The Vaccine-Friendly Plan.*

Expand full comment

These are scary times. But is seems like natural selection is reasserting itself. Your son should have been more discerning as your daughter in law clearly lacks this ability.

Expand full comment

Say goodbye to your grandchild, sorry to say. Your daughter is crazy to take the poison death jab.

Expand full comment

Say goodbye to your grandbaby!

Expand full comment

Would it possibly work to give them something tangible in return for a promise to not get boosted until she has given birth? I'd offer a few thousand dollars if I had it and the kiddos were of modest enough means for that to be meaningful. Call it a college fund, maybe. (This would not work for me, because my kids think I'm a crazy anti-vaxxer.)

You could also pay them to simply read articles and indicate that they had processed what they read. That's just what my impulse would be, and I realize it would cause tension with a lot of kids.

There's always hope that she's not so misguided as to get a second booster - not many people are getting a 4th shot.

FWIW, both my kids are COVID "vaxxed", very much against my wishes. One is 21 and so didn't need anyone's permission. The other is 16 and got my husband's permission. She also needed the "vaccine" to go on a trip. The older one got "vaxxed" before getting omicron, the other one got omicron first.

Expand full comment

I appreciate your ideas. I think I need to somehow create a small amount of doubt about Vax safety. They stopped drinking during pregnancy to be careful. I think the doctors are the villains. But, they are heavily coerced from above.

Expand full comment

I found Robert F Kennedy Jr.’s new book on Covid called A Letter to Liberals an excellent read. It is short and well documented with footnotes. I can’t remember if it has any pregnancy information but it certainly casts doubt in a compelling way on the official narrative. A good Christmas present for anyone who might be slightly open. It could definitely change a mind or two.

Expand full comment

I do ask a lot. It is really interesting how far fetched people get when talking about these jabs. They make unimaginable claims, that are easy to debunk factually. It is very hard to talk to the relatives.

I have written about talking to people https://shlomokafka.substack.com/p/hacking-the-covid-cult?utm_source=%2Fprofile%2F58893753-shlomo-kafka&utm_medium=reader2

Expand full comment

It seems the stronger the evidence that the jabs are dangerous to individuals, the more the Vax Brainwashed are in denial. It also seems that the “trusted” doctors who recommended the jabs and now see excessive all cause sickness and death all around them, are in denial. That “denial” is to protect themselves emotionally from the eventual realization that they caused the misery they are seeing.

Expand full comment

They do seem rather childlike, dependent on the most absurd newscasters. Quoting the ever changing bs: it stops transmission, you are selfish, no one ever said it stops transmission…I have to say Covid has lowered my estimation of humanity in general in terms of intelligence and critical thinking.

Expand full comment

The thing is, that MSM are viewed as legitimate, while "personal views" are viewed as illegitimate. I made it clear to my children, this shot may castrate or kill them, but my son got two shots anyway (supported by his vaccinated mother, who bought MSM narrative although she grew up in the dissident family in then communist Czechoslovakia).

Many of my friends now got their fourth shot without any coercion. They still believe.

Expand full comment

The fact is that for liberals there is an almost total blackout of information that in any way conflicts with the official narrative. They are now strongly programmed which was obviously deliberate. The new Twitter brouhaha about Musk banning a few liberal journalists was rich because no one made a peep or mentioned freedom of speech when numerous prominent doctors and scientists were exiled or shadow banned during Covid in order to streamline propaganda. It kinda worked. But people like Rachel Maddow, obviously intelligent yet spouting this one sided garbage, are really to blame. Journalists have really let society down here causing much harm.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Aug 5, 2022Edited
Comment removed
Expand full comment

None of my friends lost babies in their 40s until this year.

I think the data is flawed because it comes from the infertile who are undergoing fertility treatment.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Aug 5, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

May your daughter recover fully! Wishing you and her all the best and thankful for her service!

Expand full comment

🙏🏻♥️

Expand full comment

This is yet another demonstration of your integrity, Igor, and shows that you are not looking for patterns to validate your beliefs/fears/assumptions but are examining the data to see what it reveals independent of your previously stated opinions.

I do hope you are right in this hunch. We could use some good news as the injected slowly awaken to what they have done to themselves and start looking for ways to mitigate the negative side effects.

Expand full comment

I wanted to say the same! I am very grateful! I wrote about the vaccines in my book and I decided not to write that they seem to cause (permanent) infertility. I wanted to be careful and wait for more data.

I know there are many other people who would have simply not have mentioned this topic anymore. But you, Igor, are honest and open with this and this is actually another great demonstration of your integritiy! You just want to find the truth! Many others (whether pro or contra vaccine) just publish what fits with their narrative. And when there is data that does not fit with their ideology, they will NOT write about it or ignore it etc. But you are different! You are a fighther for truth! We highly appreciate this.

Although the data seems to indicate that it may "only" be temporal, I think we need to wait for some more time and analyse more countries... The data is not absolutely conclusive yet.

I also think it would be great to conduct something like a meta analysis in some months. In this meta analysis the average change compared to previous years of all (analyzable) countries could be investigated. So we could find out if there is a worldwide statistically significant decline or if there is no change after all.

Maybe this could be done in April or May 2023. Comparing the birth rates of all countries in April/May 2023 with birth rates in April/May 2022, April/May 2021 etc.

In this way we also find out if there was a worldwide statistically significant decline in 2022 and whether this decline actually disappered in 2023...

Even if it would be temporal... I would like to note that this is still NOT acceptable at all! People have not been informed about severe (temporary) damage to their health! They were not informed about this before they took the vaccines.

Expand full comment

Very good ideas!

Expand full comment

A meta-analysis comparing years is a great idea, Max! Perhaps World Council for Health could survey the Control Group (https://www.vaxcontrolgroup.com/ and https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/news/statements/researchgate-control-group) for comparison.

Expand full comment

Thank you! But I think this is difficult. Probably many unvaccinated people live healthier and thus are not comparable with vaccinated people. It would have to be a very well matched control group.

First of all, comparing the different years (2023, 2022, 2021 etc.) will already be quite telling. And if, in addition to that, a comparison with a matched control group is possible, this would be even better.

Expand full comment

The other complication is the unvaxxed have been reporting menstrual irregularities and other symptoms due to shedding, most likely, so even the control group is compromised.

Expand full comment

Terrible! So you think shedding actually happens? I know Igor also wrote an article about it... but if this actually real, for how much time does shedding occur after having been vaccinated? Just some months or forever?

Expand full comment

There is increasing evidence that it is occurring. Initially, physicians and scientists thought it may only happen for a few weeks post-injection, but there are concerns that it may be for a longer period of time since the injected are now spike protein factories with no off-switch. The truth is there is no way to know since there are no long-term trials, so we simply have to wait and see what the fallout is.

Expand full comment

The roughly estimated 30% of the developed world, or whatever it percentage the narrative has hiden from us, that has not taken any COVID jab is the only possible control group. The ideal control group should equal the experimental test group, but this has intentionally been made impossible by the intense coercion and disregard of medical and religious exemptions combined with coordinated job terminations across the USA mostly by late January 2022. I estimate that the job termination bullies influenced about 20% of the US population to reluctantly get jabbed to save their jobs. With 70% of the US having at least one jab, these people are totally disqualified from the control group. It is what it is.

Expand full comment

https://conspatriots.com/dr-fauci-just-threatened-70-of-americans/ Here are some new numbers on unvaxxed in USA. I was surprised. I thought more had been vaxxed.

Expand full comment

That article does not provide any links, are you sure that what it is saying is true?

Expand full comment

The headline is inaccurate. The headline author introduced the inaccuracy which is not supported by the content written by the reporter. The headline causes some readers to take a leap into the drama being created, but the drama is bullshit.

Expand full comment

"As of July 21, the Kaiser Family Foundation revealed that 227.8 million Americans had not obtained a main round of vaccinations or a booster dose. That constitutes around 70% of the population."

What exactly does "main round of vaccinations or a booster dose" mean? I suspect "main round of vaccinations" means 2 Pfizer or 2 Moderna or 1 J&J or only a booster dose. That is precisely the way I read the language written there to be tricky and confusing. These are the people who mostly got two shots and quit or picked up a booster as their first shot. This number doesn't include those who only got one jab the way it reads.

Further down it says, "The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report that 107,924,198 Americans have received the first booster. This represents 48 percent of immunized individuals."

Assuming this means 52% of those with a "main round" or "booster are not up-to-date per the CDC here, at that point, the CDC is saying, in effect, that roughly 216 million plus had at least two or three jabs, not counting the one jab folks. I thought we had a population of about 360 million being quoted for the election of November 2020, but I've heard considerably lower in the last couple months. It looks like roughly 2/3 or even 70% had at least one jab to me.

Thank you for this article. I had read it earlier, but it is certainly relevant.

Expand full comment

Imagine if all this data gathering was performed by Big Harma BEFORE releasing the prototype poison drug on the world. Imagine if 5-10 years of trial data was performed tracking all adverse events. Imagine if this long term data was presented to the captured government agencies allowing the poison to proliferate. Imagine the lives that would have been saved. You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one.

Expand full comment

I'm sure some (not me) would say we couldn't wait because the pandemic was so deadly. I think (opinion) that the pandemic would already be over if we DIDN'T "vaccinate", and would have just treated people with therapeutics.

On a side rant, this is the part of the pandemic I can't unsee.

Expand full comment

Very well said!

Expand full comment

True. Of course in a non-corrupted drug approval process, these drugs would never finish the process as they would be pulled after a year or two of testing for being clearly too toxic, dangerous and ineffective for even further testing, let alone approval.

Expand full comment

The animals ALL DIED. We were following the trials because some r&d took place at LSU. They launched anyway. Our politicians in LA have all become millionaires in the scamdemic industry. Some of these corporations were formed as far back as 2016! Our secretary of state’s cousin has the COVID testing contract for the entire state.

Our health doesn’t matter to them because a. They are making money hand over fist and b. They are getting closer & closer to mail in ballots with every EUA.

Expand full comment

You may say I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one.. Good one.

Expand full comment

Called 'confirmation bias'.

Expand full comment

Another important step will be cell studies from ovarian biopsies. Speaking from the medical / lab perspective, we know that the molecular machinery places reproductive cells and new pregnancies as a direct target of the spike, and we know several possible ways that cells can be damaged as a result. Igor's work is giving us a view of the numerical outcome.

Much more on PubMed if you're interested, and a couple articles I appreciate here: https://medquotes.substack.com/p/spotting-the-intruder

Expand full comment

the fact that he might not have found what is the real thing, does not mean it does not exists.

look at WMC research for more on this jabs ... these are not good news.

the fact that pfizer states they are on clinical trials until may 2023 and MIGHT publish the results by may 2025 is all you need to know about these vaxx.

igor and the rest are just one man army, there is so far they can go ... if someone does not publish the real data and results what can igor or anyone do ??? not much ...

Expand full comment

All I can do is try my best

Expand full comment

Thank you for doing just that!

Expand full comment

If we can avoid mandates, truth seekers like Igor will surface and those that also seek it will know. Absent a complete tyrannical shutdown of freedom worldwide, a parallel medical publishing path will surface. If we want truth, it will find us.

The bigger issue is how to fund truth seeking trials. The gold standard double blind placebo with thousands of people is expensive.

Expand full comment

100% agree. I think crowd-funded trials may be the way to go. I suspect Steve Kirsch will be involved in creating a new, truth-seeking journal. He's halfway there with his substack.

Expand full comment

Tess Lawrie is part of a worldwide organization that intends to provide medical truth to counter the WHO and other 3-letter organization b.s. It's a pretty big group with some well-known "medical truthers."

It's going to happen. I forgot all about Steve K. If we can get even just a few HONEST philanthropists, we'll have a decent source of info.

https://drtesslawrie.substack.com/?utm_source=%2Finbox&utm_medium=reader2-nav

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Aug 5, 2022Edited
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

That’s where I am at Heidi. The agencies that should be protecting pregnant moms and babies (ACOG/ACOOG) are not . Once they said it was safe in pregnancy, ( with no long term data) , many ob/gyn doctors never thought twice. People forget thalidomide real fast. I’m shocked and disappointed.

Expand full comment

They’ve been nagging pregnant women to poison themselves with flu shots and TDaP for years now

Expand full comment

Blows my mind… I try to think back when all this started, maybe about 18 years now ? Seems to correlate when big hospitals merged /bought out community hospitals.

Expand full comment

End stage capitalism at play .

Expand full comment

Tex, I need real truth info on TDaP, where do I find that please?

Expand full comment

Start around 15 min https://thehighwire.com/videos/big-pharma-propaganda-exposed-highwire-episode-62/

Getting vaccinated for pertussis to “protect” a baby is one of the worst things you can do. It creates asymptomatic carriers

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4482312/

Expand full comment

They didn't wait even for any pregnant trial participants. IIRC, pregnant women were excluded from the EUA approval trials.

They literally excluded all the groups most vulnerable to injury (likely known from previous trials) and then told the same groups it was safe.

Expand full comment

Exactly 🎯 James A Magnant

Expand full comment

Thank you Margaret!!!

Expand full comment

Are the injected slowly awakening?

Expand full comment

Man I wish I could get some good data on this.

It's impossible to even get numbers on actual adverse events and cases and deaths, much less attitudes.

And I'm now quite sure that the Social Media Ops are tailoring messages to create illusions for each group.

Expand full comment

"And I'm now quite sure that the Social Media Ops are tailoring messages to create illusions for each group."

Yes I think the sophistication of the technological entrainment (not merely messaging, but broadcasts that trick the body into false resonance, eliminating our natural BS meters) might be one of the most under-appreciated aspects of Covid PSYOP

Expand full comment

Very sharp insight, Kathleen. Concur.

Expand full comment

So many ways to mess with a human...

Expand full comment

Mystification is where the trance/brain washing starts. Find a mystified person or if you can mystify one, you have a perfect set up/victim for BS. Its systemic in this society. Especially since there are an estimated 167 million addicts of one kind or another, Addiction and mystification go hand in hand.

Expand full comment

I have an example on this from e.g. neurology. 5 patients a day showing up with new-onset incontinence (minor inconvenience) and numb legs, most 4x vaccinated, often accompanied by blood anomalies. Spinal tap, labs, infusions, hospital stay... As a patient, this will seem like an adequate process to arrive at a definitive diagnosis and appropriate treatment.

Here's the thing. To differentiate between Guillain-Barré and other more common neurological issues (each with their own treatment strategies), you have to check one extra box on the lab request form for the spinal fluid that you took. Depending on the standards of the workplace, that test is not performed if patients have a known neurlogical condition (increasingly common with age), despite them being more prone to the autoimmune background of GB. So even the experts getting their fingers wet with spinal fluid have zero information about actual adverse events (and may consequently be missing out on a goldmine of data). '100% of new-onset incontinence due to pre-existing condition'.

From the perspective of statistics and data science, we are disappointed to not have the numbers. From the perspective of patients, diapers is disappointing, especially if prompt treatment for GB could have reversed it.

Expand full comment

Are we following these babies to see if they are okay? I am worried that they might be

not quite okay in a way that might not show until later and they are grown...

Expand full comment

Yes, I fear there may be reproductive damage (especially to the eggs of girls) that won't become apparent until they attempt to conceive.

Expand full comment

Spot on! Igor Chudov is a good model I wish more people, no matter their stance of this and related topics, would try to emulate.

Expand full comment

I, too, was thinking that this is a good example of how science is supposed to be done. And is a very helpful reminder in this "science is settled" world, that this IS a human experiment on a world-wide scale, and we do NOT YET know the full magnitude of harms (I think we already know about the negligible benefits).

Expand full comment

I wholeheartedly agree and truly appreciate the intellectual honesty in pursuing this.

Many of the Covid substacks have just been over the top the last several months with the vax doom and gloom. I stopped reading Walter as it was just too much. Clearly the jabs are awful and have done tremendous harm, but this end of humanity stuff is just unfounded hand-wringing of the worst sort. We see how miserable the triple-maskers are, no need to do the same to ourselves.

Expand full comment

walter is a technician and you can take it to the bank he is into smt. this is not about what we wish or like ...

Expand full comment

With all due respect to Walter, for a while there he started every other post with, "THIS IS MY MOST IMPORTANT FINDING YET" then went on to extrapolate some tenuously-linked paper from a decade ago to the end of mankind. I appreciate his research abilities and he is clearly a smart guy, but he's an over-the-top alarmist.

So I ask the same question I asked over there and never got an answer, why are the overwhelming majority of vax recipients seemingly fine? Clearly there's a subsection that have been harmed, but most have not (by all appearances). No one can answer this. Personally I think it's some sort of genetic disposition or hot lots, neither of which support the sky-is-falling scenario.

Life is too short and people are not equipped to live in constant fear. I read plenty of stacks on this and have dug into the mRNA in detail, it's bad news we both agree. But until Walter comes up with something concrete (as opposed to one hypothesis strung to another to another) I'll read him on occasion to see if there's anything interesting he's stumbled onto. I won't go along with the constant fear-mongering as I understand it's deeply harmful to the human psyche.

BTW, I'm unvaxxed (along with my wife an kids), take the FLCCC prevention protocol, and none of us have been sick in over two years. I'm not a Pharma apologist not a Covid hysteric, I just prefer to live my life without fear.

Expand full comment

okay jeff i will bite, i will answer you with a very simple question ... WHY arent autopsies on covid victims allowed in US??

Expand full comment

Don't forget that the mRNA does change the DNA, something they said would never happen. We really don't know the effects of this........

Expand full comment

Massive bargaining going on by Normies. Their Zombie heads are exploding and they are angling hard to put together a world where they can minimize the scope on every level.

Many are so zombified that they have chunks of blood and flesh falling out of their mouth when they brush their teeth.

Expand full comment

You forgot the <sarc> tag, or at least I hope you did.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Aug 7, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Make no mistake, Polar.

Those zombies will starve you out for being a filthy unvaxxed noncompliant after a few bad days and some more bargaining.

\ /

Expand full comment

Kumbaya, my Lord, Kumbaya! 👨‍👧‍👦

Expand full comment

Igor - Firstly, thank you. You are a constant source of trusted information for me, in a world where unfortunately not much on the mainstream nightly news can seemingly be trusted, at least in relation to covid. I am in my 30's and would like to have children in the next few years. My issue is this - I am not vaccinated with these shots, however given the data on the effect MRNA shots seem to have on DNA - I am concerned that the DNA change would likely effect sperm from a vaccinated man? It's so concerning, and there is literally no discussion about this, or commentary on it that I can find. I'm hopeful as you say in this article, that for the sake of the world, the effect on fertility rates is only temporary - but this doesn't relate to the effect on fertility (or just the health of a future baby) that could potentially arise from a change in DNA that somehow effects the sperm of a vaccinated man? Any thoughts Igor?

Expand full comment

The concerns are not exactly baseless. However, they have not yet been confirmed. If you are not planning on getting pregnant right away, keep following this stuff to see how this concern plays out. You are certainly a very valuable individual on the dating market, partly because of your unique personality and partly because you are unvaxed.

Expand full comment

I have thought about this as well.

How should we advise our kiddo about future dating and marriage? Kiddo is young enough that more will be known by time of age for dating and marriage. But this is a serious concern.

Of course, no one ever is guaranteed a child without ill health. And heck, apparently many of us carry retrovirus code from contaminated oral polio shots decades ago??? And linked to blood cancers now??

But yeah, these are serious concerns that no one is talking about.

Expand full comment

lots of hit and miss ... a lot will pay the price before any of the truths comes out over the next few years i suppose. but by that time lots of damage done ... look at the toddlers dr. gottlieb, dr. fauci, dr collins are jabbing ...

Expand full comment

There are some preliminary indications that the spike protein is being reverse transcribed into the human genome.

Expand full comment

Yes, I know. This is the problem. Among many others.

Expand full comment

🆘 Sage Hana

Expand full comment

We have the same issue advising our kids - one already dating - one still too young both pureblood. All you can do is stay informed and advise them of the potential health complications offspring of vaxxed may encounter -ultimately it is up to them. Unfortunately, there is the possibility that we do not see the full long term effects of these shots until the next generations reproductive years as I understand it. Hopefully the long term prospects are positive and the 'worst' is not yet to come.

Expand full comment

Yeah. We all keep hoping for positives with these injections, and we have yet to see a single one.

The dating thing is hard because what, is one of the questions in your first two dates gonna be, “so, have you gotten the co vid shot?” I mean, we have young kids who, in 15-20 years when they are thinking about dating and marrying, may not even know with any awareness of their parents gave it to them or not. How many of us think about our childhood medical history?

And of course people can lie.

And of course this feels incredibly discriminatory because marriage is first and foremost about the relationship.

Expand full comment

Dating is always extremely discriminatory

Expand full comment

Haha, yes, indeed, it is. You are right.

But heretofore we generally have had the luxury of focusing on obvious outward appearances and inner character. We have not had to inquire about one’s previous medical procedures that could pose a risk to ourselves or our offspring.

Expand full comment

If what we have seen with these shots so far is any indication of what the accepted 'known harms' of them in 10 years time will be then there will be fewer and fewer parents willing to risk their kids health by giving them. Already the vax rate in the under 12's is low, and under 5's lower. This is very good to see and hopefully we will see a that the uptake only declines from here. One of my kids is about the same age as yours so we have the same issue - but I figure with a declining uptake and the possibility of marrying someone 5+ years younger perhaps it won't be such an issue by then. I'm far more worried for our eldest who is already in the 'dating + marriage' territory and amongst the unvaxxed there are slim pickings! When you think of traits, health status, etc. that you would like the future partner of your child to have we all want what will be best for them, but the truth is there are many other risk factors that can come up. Genetic disorders such as fragile X, alcoholism and other addiction problems, and abusive behaviors are all traits we would avoid if possible yet, often these are not seen or known until years into the marriage. I think we just have to see the vax factor as an unfortunate additional risk - if they happen to know early perhaps they decide not to get involved as a result. However, you can not control the heart - sometimes the attraction is so strong that even though they logically understand the risk they will still be willing to take it. If we see in the next few years that there are substantial long term reproductive harms caused then I have no doubt dating will become segregated as a result.

Expand full comment

Yes, exactly re other unknown risks that exist in ANY relationship. We are never guaranteed any particular outcome. So in my less insane moments, I generally think as you have said, that this is going to be yet one more risk - known or not.

Lord Jesus, come quickly.

Expand full comment

Go on a purebloods dating app:)

Expand full comment

Wondering how you'd prove you are a pureblood.

Expand full comment

Maybe a D-Dimer test could be helpful....

Expand full comment

Mary, I absolutely understand your concern and I do have the same problem. First of all, see what Dr. Seneff (MIT senior researcher) wrote in her review:

"Furthermore, as we shall see later, the mRNA in the new SARS-CoV-2 vaccines could also get passed on from generation to generation, with the help of LINEs expressed in sperm, via nonintegrated cDNA encapsulated in plasmids. The implications of this predictable phenomenon are unclear, but potentially far-reaching.."

Title of this review:

"Worse Than the Disease? Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of the mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19" published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research

I am a man (unvaccinated) and I also want to find a woman and become a father in some time. I feel extremely bad because somehow I think this is a severe form of discrimination... But I just want to find an unvaccinated woman.

I feel I am discriminating vaccinated people in this way. But I do not know if the vaccines have any negative effect on the woman (DNA) and finally on our child.... We have zero data and zero idea. I do not want to accept this risk. I want that my children can be healthy and that the children of my children can be healthy, too. Who knows what these vaccines cause... to which changes they lead...

How do we know that children of vaccinated people (whether mother of father) won´t have a much higher cancer rate or a lower life expentancy etc etc etc ????!!! Where is the data??? It is not available. There is no science. There is only propaganda.

So I think I will have to discriminate women.... I never thought I would ever be in such a horrible situation.

Also, they are developing self spreading vaccines.... So in some years there might be vaccines which spread like a virus... How will this affect us and our DNA??? Does this mean we will have to stay at least meters away from everyone to avoid being "vaccinated" against our will?

Expand full comment

Research the info about the people found to have MAC addresses broadcasting to wifi systems.

The European study which came out first in early 2021 identified only vaccinated people and distinquished from the unvaxxed.

The Mexican study which came out recently in 2022 did the same but also picked up some unvaxxed with MAC addresses who had vaxxed partners or in very close contact with vaxxed inside the household or working situations. It sounded like it was a small percentage. It also randomly picked up MAC addresses coming from dead people buried in a cemetery by just walking around and letting the noise guide them to the gravestone which only went to people who died in 2021 and 2022. They were inspired by the Spanish 5th column studies that found graphene in the vials.

Many people who are unvaxxed have had symptoms of skin inflammation where touched as well as irregularities in women's menses especially post-menopausal shortly after close and/or hours of contact with the jabbed.

Expand full comment

Ahahahahaaaa MAC addresses, love it.

Expand full comment

Yes, what a horrible situation exactly. You describe the angst well.

Expand full comment

Pureblood here :)

Expand full comment

I wondered if it was temporary because so many couples put of their weddings. Including our daughter. Now she is having a baby in November, she and her husband are both unvaccinated, I am glad about that. Yippee!

Expand full comment

Yay!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Expand full comment