Not so sure...!.the numbers represent the real science....without them, we can win no argument against this monster.....Plato's allagory of the cave explains the predicament in terms of convincing those still asleep, that there is a problem....I reckon, just as they used " safe and effective " to blindfold people to the danger, the term" excess mortality" should be our warcry in trying to wake them up, and to that end that statistical analysis is exactly what we need.....we are already inside the "belly of the beast" we need all hands on deck to get us out of here....the more ammunition.....the better...!🤷♂️🙏
Well said. I’ll just add a few thoughts. Will Rogers said: “There are three kinds of men. The ones that learn by readin’. The few who learn by observation. The rest of them have to pee on the electric fence for themselves.”
In other words, the main lesson of history is that most people learn the hard way.
So, we must push back against the jab where we can in an attempt to save at least a few, but also realize that many cannot be saved.
Well, we are in the “age of pretending.” Ordinary people, politicians, physicians, bureaucrats, media, companies, academia, law enforcement et al, are pretending not to know things. Some because they can’t bear to know they were duped and possibly ruined theirs and their children’s health, some because they’re guilty, some because they aided and abetted, some because they knew and were silent. We are the canaries in the coal mine of death and the usual suspects pretend not hear us. Mark my words, many of the innocent, and the willfully blind, will cry out, “Why didn’t you warn us!?!?” Be sure to save a record of your warnings... copies of emails or letters, social media posts... even contemporaneous notes - with dates and times - of conversations. Be able to “bring the receipts.” At the end of the pretending comes the weeping and wailing.
Maybe thats the whole idea behind the substack scientists. Maybe they are just rodeo clowns (like Sage?) to distract the wrath of the people. Psyops aplenty.
Forced medical procedures like with injection mandates are Nuremberg crimes, regardless of the data, so why has all this time been wasted?
Time is ticking by with not too much being done, because fear and money keeping people silent. It couldn’t happen if people weren’t paid off, blackmailed, threatened. An unbelievable amount of people still in the dark due to the silencing.
In Ontario Canada general masking and more shots are pushed by paid off Pharma Dr. because they say the yrusses are back making too many sick to handle ,so only masks and needles are the cure . I think could it be that all the injections harming the immune system makes more people sick now than before the injections ? Injection of poison has consequences .
This is a very interesting point. My initial thought, on reading this article, was, "Wow! What an excellent way to crowd-source [real] science: We can all, in our own free time (that we don't have, sadly, but we can try to make it), take whatever datasets are relevant and available for COVID-vaxx rate and mortality rate for given areas and compare them and compile the data!"
My next thought immediately following that was, "Yeah, but ... What good would it honestly do?" Those who have taken a full compliment of shots are not only at much higher risk of serious morbidity and mortality than those who did not, but they have a much, MUCH lower propensity to look at whatever data we generate. Simply put, anyone who would "believe" our data won't do so, and anyone who will, by now, already knows.
It might be morbidly interesting, as an experiment, and I applaud Igor for doing the initial crunch -- but, in the end, is it really worth it? Will it really help anyone?
*Maybe.* I do hold out for a maybe, if we can amass a large enough body of unassailable data. But ... My next thought, as I was typing this, was, "Yeah, but -- can we even trust the published vaxxed rates?" Sage raises yet another interesting point, which is, "And, is it just a distraction?"
(Yes, I refuse to call the mRNA shot a "vaccination." I know it's fiddly and nit-picky and that the use of the colloquial term "vaxx" makes me sound tin-foil hat, but words matter. 2 + 2 still does not equal 5, even if a consensus of paid pharma execs says it does.)
There are still governments promoting the injection (Canada) and have millions of doses in stock and more millions of doses on order. Nobody should take them and more warnings and data will hopefully help.
It is vitally important that we data mine and get to the bottom of the mRNA fiasco because it is being widely hailed as a success and as a result, a whole host of other vaccines and gene therapy treatments are in the pipeline and won't be needing to run the rigorous safety testing that these vaccines avoided.
Perhaps it was the payload (spike) or perhaps the lipid nanoparticles that are responsible (or more likely a combination). I don't know, and that is why we need to relentlessly raise red flags until they admit fault and go back to the 10 year pipeline for product development, without destroying the control group after a few short months.
"Just Say NO!" to any intrusions by needle. We don't really see very many significant politicians suddenly dropping, and they are of the upper-age group or at least not in their youth, as many unfortunate others. Just an observation.
But the reality of this horrible plan to reduce the population by 90-95 % will probably continue to be attempted, whether it be by needle, or some other means, aerosols, through our water supply and so just saying "NO" is a start, but not a means to an end. The satanists have a very crafty general leading out.
Yes Ray in hospitals the killing is done with remdesivir ,ventilators and general mistreatment ,not so much with needles . Besides anything they did to us and still do is harmful .It has genocide written all over it .
No. I agree. It is very important to constantly hammer home that it was an untrialled DNA altering genetic experiment. More precisely, a bioweapon. Calling it a "vaccination", as people understand vaccines, is a lie, and a twisting of language to deceive.
Excellent critical thinking. Second or third order thinking: to analyze not the data, but the likely motives that shape those who do, or would, analyze it. This is rarely seen, even places like here. Variants of this wisdom can be found in the sayings like "Follow the money" and "Who profits?" Nietzsche did this in at least two places, analyzing "The prejudices of philosophers" and plausible psychoanalysis of St. Paul in creating Christianity. The results of such inquiry and the insights they may bring are by no means guaranteed to yield happiness, a point he makes abundantly clear also at the beginning of "Beyond God and Evil."
Returning briefly to the current topic: Yes, we can analyze the data on our own. But whom are we doing it for? Does one really think one is going to awaken the sleeping, to reform the obviously corrupt political and corporate entities who perpetrate their dark deeds? That seems rather ambitious. On the other hand, if we set more modest goals, such as to create work we can share here, for example, that is easier to achieve. Even easier is to decide for oneself the truth, or more honestly, to make as close an approximation to The Truth® as a mortal can.
As long as we stay in the numbers crunching we don't have to look up at the Monster.
A very deep thought!!!!
Not so sure...!.the numbers represent the real science....without them, we can win no argument against this monster.....Plato's allagory of the cave explains the predicament in terms of convincing those still asleep, that there is a problem....I reckon, just as they used " safe and effective " to blindfold people to the danger, the term" excess mortality" should be our warcry in trying to wake them up, and to that end that statistical analysis is exactly what we need.....we are already inside the "belly of the beast" we need all hands on deck to get us out of here....the more ammunition.....the better...!🤷♂️🙏
Grant Simmons,
Well said. I’ll just add a few thoughts. Will Rogers said: “There are three kinds of men. The ones that learn by readin’. The few who learn by observation. The rest of them have to pee on the electric fence for themselves.”
In other words, the main lesson of history is that most people learn the hard way.
So, we must push back against the jab where we can in an attempt to save at least a few, but also realize that many cannot be saved.
Here's a gem from the old Ren & Stimpy show:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=azxx9sG4Gjw
😂so very true
OK, you're right, but please, Professor, pay no attention to me as I whet my Roman Short sword while the class is being taught. OK?
Ray
Well, we are in the “age of pretending.” Ordinary people, politicians, physicians, bureaucrats, media, companies, academia, law enforcement et al, are pretending not to know things. Some because they can’t bear to know they were duped and possibly ruined theirs and their children’s health, some because they’re guilty, some because they aided and abetted, some because they knew and were silent. We are the canaries in the coal mine of death and the usual suspects pretend not hear us. Mark my words, many of the innocent, and the willfully blind, will cry out, “Why didn’t you warn us!?!?” Be sure to save a record of your warnings... copies of emails or letters, social media posts... even contemporaneous notes - with dates and times - of conversations. Be able to “bring the receipts.” At the end of the pretending comes the weeping and wailing.
Maybe thats the whole idea behind the substack scientists. Maybe they are just rodeo clowns (like Sage?) to distract the wrath of the people. Psyops aplenty.
Forced medical procedures like with injection mandates are Nuremberg crimes, regardless of the data, so why has all this time been wasted?
Time is ticking by with not too much being done, because fear and money keeping people silent. It couldn’t happen if people weren’t paid off, blackmailed, threatened. An unbelievable amount of people still in the dark due to the silencing.
an idea:
https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/guesstimating-relative-risk-of-mortality/comment/10449583
In Ontario Canada general masking and more shots are pushed by paid off Pharma Dr. because they say the yrusses are back making too many sick to handle ,so only masks and needles are the cure . I think could it be that all the injections harming the immune system makes more people sick now than before the injections ? Injection of poison has consequences .
This is a very interesting point. My initial thought, on reading this article, was, "Wow! What an excellent way to crowd-source [real] science: We can all, in our own free time (that we don't have, sadly, but we can try to make it), take whatever datasets are relevant and available for COVID-vaxx rate and mortality rate for given areas and compare them and compile the data!"
My next thought immediately following that was, "Yeah, but ... What good would it honestly do?" Those who have taken a full compliment of shots are not only at much higher risk of serious morbidity and mortality than those who did not, but they have a much, MUCH lower propensity to look at whatever data we generate. Simply put, anyone who would "believe" our data won't do so, and anyone who will, by now, already knows.
It might be morbidly interesting, as an experiment, and I applaud Igor for doing the initial crunch -- but, in the end, is it really worth it? Will it really help anyone?
*Maybe.* I do hold out for a maybe, if we can amass a large enough body of unassailable data. But ... My next thought, as I was typing this, was, "Yeah, but -- can we even trust the published vaxxed rates?" Sage raises yet another interesting point, which is, "And, is it just a distraction?"
(Yes, I refuse to call the mRNA shot a "vaccination." I know it's fiddly and nit-picky and that the use of the colloquial term "vaxx" makes me sound tin-foil hat, but words matter. 2 + 2 still does not equal 5, even if a consensus of paid pharma execs says it does.)
You are asking a good question.
Ultimately it is my opinion that it is worth it. For many reasons.
There are still governments promoting the injection (Canada) and have millions of doses in stock and more millions of doses on order. Nobody should take them and more warnings and data will hopefully help.
Look at Acuitas Pharmaceuticals and the Trudeau Family Foundation association.
We get a double dip- WEF minion and profit from the LNP chemistry from UBC.
I know. No wonder he is promoting this vax like candy. It might be even criminal for him to promote an experimental vax for his own profit.
I agree completely.
The more data, the more analysis, the better.
It is vitally important that we data mine and get to the bottom of the mRNA fiasco because it is being widely hailed as a success and as a result, a whole host of other vaccines and gene therapy treatments are in the pipeline and won't be needing to run the rigorous safety testing that these vaccines avoided.
Perhaps it was the payload (spike) or perhaps the lipid nanoparticles that are responsible (or more likely a combination). I don't know, and that is why we need to relentlessly raise red flags until they admit fault and go back to the 10 year pipeline for product development, without destroying the control group after a few short months.
"Just Say NO!" to any intrusions by needle. We don't really see very many significant politicians suddenly dropping, and they are of the upper-age group or at least not in their youth, as many unfortunate others. Just an observation.
But the reality of this horrible plan to reduce the population by 90-95 % will probably continue to be attempted, whether it be by needle, or some other means, aerosols, through our water supply and so just saying "NO" is a start, but not a means to an end. The satanists have a very crafty general leading out.
ray
Yes Ray in hospitals the killing is done with remdesivir ,ventilators and general mistreatment ,not so much with needles . Besides anything they did to us and still do is harmful .It has genocide written all over it .
No. I agree. It is very important to constantly hammer home that it was an untrialled DNA altering genetic experiment. More precisely, a bioweapon. Calling it a "vaccination", as people understand vaccines, is a lie, and a twisting of language to deceive.
Excellent critical thinking. Second or third order thinking: to analyze not the data, but the likely motives that shape those who do, or would, analyze it. This is rarely seen, even places like here. Variants of this wisdom can be found in the sayings like "Follow the money" and "Who profits?" Nietzsche did this in at least two places, analyzing "The prejudices of philosophers" and plausible psychoanalysis of St. Paul in creating Christianity. The results of such inquiry and the insights they may bring are by no means guaranteed to yield happiness, a point he makes abundantly clear also at the beginning of "Beyond God and Evil."
Returning briefly to the current topic: Yes, we can analyze the data on our own. But whom are we doing it for? Does one really think one is going to awaken the sleeping, to reform the obviously corrupt political and corporate entities who perpetrate their dark deeds? That seems rather ambitious. On the other hand, if we set more modest goals, such as to create work we can share here, for example, that is easier to achieve. Even easier is to decide for oneself the truth, or more honestly, to make as close an approximation to The Truth® as a mortal can.
EGGS ZACTLY!!!