370 Comments
Nov 14, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

I cannot comment on the stats....but only add what was for me a clarifying thought from another substack today. It’s still so hard for us to imagine any government’s participation in a genocide....but it shouldn’t be. Just look at history...too often.

Expand full comment

As long as we stay in the numbers crunching we don't have to look up at the Monster.

Expand full comment
author

A very deep thought!!!!

Expand full comment

Not so sure...!.the numbers represent the real science....without them, we can win no argument against this monster.....Plato's allagory of the cave explains the predicament in terms of convincing those still asleep, that there is a problem....I reckon, just as they used " safe and effective " to blindfold people to the danger, the term" excess mortality" should be our warcry in trying to wake them up, and to that end that statistical analysis is exactly what we need.....we are already inside the "belly of the beast" we need all hands on deck to get us out of here....the more ammunition.....the better...!🤷‍♂️🙏

Expand full comment

Grant Simmons,

Well said. I’ll just add a few thoughts. Will Rogers said: “There are three kinds of men. The ones that learn by readin’. The few who learn by observation. The rest of them have to pee on the electric fence for themselves.”

In other words, the main lesson of history is that most people learn the hard way.

So, we must push back against the jab where we can in an attempt to save at least a few, but also realize that many cannot be saved.

Expand full comment

Here's a gem from the old Ren & Stimpy show:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=azxx9sG4Gjw

Expand full comment

😂so very true

Expand full comment

OK, you're right, but please, Professor, pay no attention to me as I whet my Roman Short sword while the class is being taught. OK?

Ray

Expand full comment
Nov 14, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

Well, we are in the “age of pretending.” Ordinary people, politicians, physicians, bureaucrats, media, companies, academia, law enforcement et al, are pretending not to know things. Some because they can’t bear to know they were duped and possibly ruined theirs and their children’s health, some because they’re guilty, some because they aided and abetted, some because they knew and were silent. We are the canaries in the coal mine of death and the usual suspects pretend not hear us. Mark my words, many of the innocent, and the willfully blind, will cry out, “Why didn’t you warn us!?!?” Be sure to save a record of your warnings... copies of emails or letters, social media posts... even contemporaneous notes - with dates and times - of conversations. Be able to “bring the receipts.” At the end of the pretending comes the weeping and wailing.

Expand full comment
Nov 14, 2022·edited Nov 14, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

Maybe thats the whole idea behind the substack scientists. Maybe they are just rodeo clowns (like Sage?) to distract the wrath of the people. Psyops aplenty.

Forced medical procedures like with injection mandates are Nuremberg crimes, regardless of the data, so why has all this time been wasted?

Expand full comment
Nov 14, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

Time is ticking by with not too much being done, because fear and money keeping people silent. It couldn’t happen if people weren’t paid off, blackmailed, threatened. An unbelievable amount of people still in the dark due to the silencing.

Expand full comment

In Ontario Canada general masking and more shots are pushed by paid off Pharma Dr. because they say the yrusses are back making too many sick to handle ,so only masks and needles are the cure . I think could it be that all the injections harming the immune system makes more people sick now than before the injections ? Injection of poison has consequences .

Expand full comment

This is a very interesting point. My initial thought, on reading this article, was, "Wow! What an excellent way to crowd-source [real] science: We can all, in our own free time (that we don't have, sadly, but we can try to make it), take whatever datasets are relevant and available for COVID-vaxx rate and mortality rate for given areas and compare them and compile the data!"

My next thought immediately following that was, "Yeah, but ... What good would it honestly do?" Those who have taken a full compliment of shots are not only at much higher risk of serious morbidity and mortality than those who did not, but they have a much, MUCH lower propensity to look at whatever data we generate. Simply put, anyone who would "believe" our data won't do so, and anyone who will, by now, already knows.

It might be morbidly interesting, as an experiment, and I applaud Igor for doing the initial crunch -- but, in the end, is it really worth it? Will it really help anyone?

*Maybe.* I do hold out for a maybe, if we can amass a large enough body of unassailable data. But ... My next thought, as I was typing this, was, "Yeah, but -- can we even trust the published vaxxed rates?" Sage raises yet another interesting point, which is, "And, is it just a distraction?"

(Yes, I refuse to call the mRNA shot a "vaccination." I know it's fiddly and nit-picky and that the use of the colloquial term "vaxx" makes me sound tin-foil hat, but words matter. 2 + 2 still does not equal 5, even if a consensus of paid pharma execs says it does.)

Expand full comment
author

You are asking a good question.

Ultimately it is my opinion that it is worth it. For many reasons.

Expand full comment

There are still governments promoting the injection (Canada) and have millions of doses in stock and more millions of doses on order. Nobody should take them and more warnings and data will hopefully help.

Expand full comment

Look at Acuitas Pharmaceuticals and the Trudeau Family Foundation association.

We get a double dip- WEF minion and profit from the LNP chemistry from UBC.

Expand full comment

I know. No wonder he is promoting this vax like candy. It might be even criminal for him to promote an experimental vax for his own profit.

Expand full comment

I agree completely.

The more data, the more analysis, the better.

Expand full comment

It is vitally important that we data mine and get to the bottom of the mRNA fiasco because it is being widely hailed as a success and as a result, a whole host of other vaccines and gene therapy treatments are in the pipeline and won't be needing to run the rigorous safety testing that these vaccines avoided.

Perhaps it was the payload (spike) or perhaps the lipid nanoparticles that are responsible (or more likely a combination). I don't know, and that is why we need to relentlessly raise red flags until they admit fault and go back to the 10 year pipeline for product development, without destroying the control group after a few short months.

Expand full comment

"Just Say NO!" to any intrusions by needle. We don't really see very many significant politicians suddenly dropping, and they are of the upper-age group or at least not in their youth, as many unfortunate others. Just an observation.

But the reality of this horrible plan to reduce the population by 90-95 % will probably continue to be attempted, whether it be by needle, or some other means, aerosols, through our water supply and so just saying "NO" is a start, but not a means to an end. The satanists have a very crafty general leading out.

ray

Expand full comment

Yes Ray in hospitals the killing is done with remdesivir ,ventilators and general mistreatment ,not so much with needles . Besides anything they did to us and still do is harmful .It has genocide written all over it .

Expand full comment

No. I agree. It is very important to constantly hammer home that it was an untrialled DNA altering genetic experiment. More precisely, a bioweapon. Calling it a "vaccination", as people understand vaccines, is a lie, and a twisting of language to deceive.

Expand full comment

Excellent critical thinking. Second or third order thinking: to analyze not the data, but the likely motives that shape those who do, or would, analyze it. This is rarely seen, even places like here. Variants of this wisdom can be found in the sayings like "Follow the money" and "Who profits?" Nietzsche did this in at least two places, analyzing "The prejudices of philosophers" and plausible psychoanalysis of St. Paul in creating Christianity. The results of such inquiry and the insights they may bring are by no means guaranteed to yield happiness, a point he makes abundantly clear also at the beginning of "Beyond God and Evil."

Returning briefly to the current topic: Yes, we can analyze the data on our own. But whom are we doing it for? Does one really think one is going to awaken the sleeping, to reform the obviously corrupt political and corporate entities who perpetrate their dark deeds? That seems rather ambitious. On the other hand, if we set more modest goals, such as to create work we can share here, for example, that is easier to achieve. Even easier is to decide for oneself the truth, or more honestly, to make as close an approximation to The Truth® as a mortal can.

Expand full comment

EGGS ZACTLY!!!

Expand full comment

Sadly, a great many if not most people appear to believe that horrors from the past cannot repeat in the present. They think our modern times are too evolved, too sophisticated to do such genocidal acts as were done in the past. Wrong.

Expand full comment
Nov 14, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

I think I would prefer that all excess mortality end within a 6 month time frame of the final booster (which one would hope is tomorrow). I have 5 children who are fully vaccinated, for reasons ranging from ignorance in the early days of the vaccine rollout (how clever they were to get the jab as soon as it rolled out), to coercion for personal social freedom, to the overwhelming desire to become employed. On the other hand, if increased cancer is one of the side effects, it is unlikely to stop for years, because we can keep people going for years. The same is true for many autoimmune diseases. Many are survivable for a time. In both cases the quality of life is severely diminished, so I am not sure this is in any way a good outcome. I have not been jabbed at all and I do not wish to outlive any of them,

Expand full comment
author
Nov 14, 2022·edited Nov 14, 2022Author

Actually same (similar) from me -- I have a reason to want to know - and want to be proven wrong

Expand full comment
Nov 14, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

Same. I have seen some of the jabbed exhibiting "vaxenfreude" at the deaths of unjabbed people but don't get joy from others' misfortune and don't feel the same way toward them. I don't want any more of the jabbed to die prematurely and unnecessarily but unfortunately the universe does not hear or respond to my demands and the die has been cast. Everything that has happened had to happen, because of the law of cause and effect, and it also follows that everything that must happen will happen. It would be great for you to be proven wrong Igor but for similar reasons to those outlined by Ann I don't think you will be. Jab induced but slowly progressing cancers are already in the pipeline and new boosters are already being planned. By the way, this was an excellent post Igor, as always. I am sure all of your readers appreciate all the hard work you do and I hope you keep these regression analyses coming!

Expand full comment

It's not the jabbed I'm angry at, but the nasty mandate supporters. Those who opposed mandates were less hateful or apt to gloat at others' deaths. This nastiness preceded the clot shot--starting about gloating over deaths of "Covid deniers" who refused to socially distance/stay home/wash their hands/wear masks/pay homage to the powerful spirit Covid they faithfully worshipped and strove to appease. "Follow the science" while they were really acting like superstitious tribespeople. Fauci was the witchdoctor.

Expand full comment
Nov 14, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

I do hope that the vagaries of the human immune system and our diverse genetics are at work. I've always been amazed at those who were never at risk to begin with as witnessed by many stories and validated in the UK Challenge trials. Of course, we have no real clue why they were immune despite big data. Perhaps because we many never have tried to look. To think those immune people might be more at risk because they followed recommendation from authorities who pretend to be scientists.

Like the immune folk, we are unsure of our personal risk after getting the vaccine. At 82, my horizon hardly matters in the grand scheme, but my heart is troubled by what we may have done to children in our foolish zeal for compliance. And it seems clear that compliance was more important than health given the children's risk.

An immense crime has been committed. Likely it is so huge there will be no accountability.

Expand full comment

There's always accountability. You just may not see it on earth.

Expand full comment
Nov 14, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

Be nice if God would pick up the receiver on this one.

But it is not our place to determine when he answers the phone.

Expand full comment

Yes, for sure! I have prayed that God would intervene and cause the pit which these criminals have dug for our demise, to be that which swallows them up. But I truly think that this will be left to run its evil course, since all nations have forsaken God, and turned unto their "idols." INHO

Expand full comment

It sure seems like that. Lots of wide spread wickedness going on.

Expand full comment

In the Oliver Stone movie "The Doors," there's a scene where (more or less): Andy Warhol is hosting a party. He holds an unplugged telephone (1960s kind) which he hands to Jim Morrison. Warhol says "Someone gave me this phone. He said I could use it to talk to God. But it occurs to me that I have nothing to say to Him."

Expand full comment

At least it's good ole Jim won't be too disappointed, then.

Expand full comment

Bible makes clear that the "Judgement" takes place in heaven, BUT the execution of that Judgement WILL be in fact during the SECOND Return of Christ, called the "second death". And it is written that it will take place here on earth, and witnessed by the saved.

Expand full comment
Nov 14, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

Your last sentence is exactly what they'll hide behind to avoid accountability and justice.

And they'll probably get away with it......

Expand full comment
author

yep -- sadly

Expand full comment

But rest assured, Sir, that God will repay. No escaping Judgement by death. Repentance is the only way, through Christ, but I doubt we'll see much if any of that happening in their camp.

Stay well, garden, get some sun, get some SON, (a lot of that) and rejoice for thy Redemption draweth nigh.

Expand full comment
Nov 14, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

corruption "too big to fail"?

Expand full comment

Let us pray that there WILL BE accountability on this Earth and that we all will live to see it.

Expand full comment

Yes. But of not on this earth, certainly in the hereafter.

Expand full comment

Don't hold your breath, Igor! This is as sure as death itself.

Ray

Expand full comment

The way in which these jabs were designed is so evil, it is difficult to grasp how someone with medical skills would do something this - the people behind the jabs KNEW the likely outcomes both short and long term and still went ahead with them anyway. Mengele was a minor psycho compared with these creatures. You are correct that there are many side effects like cancers, cardio-vascular and motor-neuron conditions that will take years to fully manifest and that is why I am very worried about what is coming up. I too have jabbed relatives and I do not want them to suffer the consequences of the greatest crime of all time.

Expand full comment

In my view, what is worse than dying from the shots is what we've just gone through and are still going through - the destruction of lives while we are still living.

Expand full comment

I'd gladly offer my own life if I knew it would end this ugliness.

Expand full comment

I agree that the abuse of power and the absurd measures that have brought about unmeasurable economic and health damage. However, there is a possibility that this can be reversed (I am an optimist). Death is very much final and I pretty sure given a choice, all those who were unfortunate to pass away, would have chosen our lives.

Expand full comment

I am sure they know now what they did. I am also sure they knew of the inadequate testing, I am not as sure they knew how bad they really were. Profits and ambition can be powerful blinders to truth.

Expand full comment

Some, perhaps most, of the politicians clearly did not know how bad they are, and most of those are still in denial. But that is not a defence, even for them, to a murder charge. They knew the testing was brief and in Pfizer's case done by a company famous for fraud, they knew they had not been tested for impact on the pregnant let alone the impact on embryos, and they knew a girl had been horribly injured in the trial on children. They knew that vaccines had been withdrawn in the past due to unexpected deaths and harms. And yet they made them compulsory in some cases and effectively compulsory in others. That is enough. They knew all that, and they are absolutely guilty of the consequences.

Expand full comment

The politicians KNEW and that is why most made sure that they were exempt from the jabs. They were the ones who arranged for the jabs to be purchased and were well aware of the absurd conditions imposed by the big Harma players like Pfizer. Full indemnity, complete secrecy, government mandated uptake and government suppression of alternative treatments were the non-negotiable conditions required by Pfizer. No politician can claim that upon seeing those conditions, they did not know that they were dealing with a criminal entity. The only reason why the conditions were needed was that the jabs were toxic and anyone with a few working neurons would have realized that. In short, unless they were brain dead, the politicians knew.

Expand full comment

Some may have believed that those conditions were necessary because of the warp speed I guess, the ones who knew all that. Currently in England we have a politician call Matt Hancock, who was Health Secretary here when the roll out happened, who would have been aware of all that, and who succeeded in pushing for the mandatory jabbing of care home workers, many of who would have been of child bearing age. He is now playing truant from his job in order to participate in a reality TV show in which he has to eat fish eyes and have maggots poured on him in the hope of winning forgiveness from the country. But he is not asking for forgiveness for the forcible "vaccines" or the house arrest of the nation or the rising death rates. He is seeking mercy because he was caught on camera kissing an aide, thus breaking his own social distancing rules. The public really resent the kissing (Matt: "But I was in lurve!") and have not yet noticed his real crimes.

Expand full comment

Complete secrecy might have been justified in some cases (to protect IP). However the suppression of alternative treatments and full indemnity were dead giveaways that their "product" was neither effective (why suppress competition?) or safe. I know that most will play the "victim" game but this will work only if the people let them get away with it. If they do get away with it, make no mistake, they will do it again so I hope that hoi polloi wakes up and does what is needed to hold them accountable.

Expand full comment

There is a reason politicians aren't suddenly dropping over dead; their 'vaccines' were saline. Dr. Pierre Koury took 'care' of them with drugs denied to us. Congress is a sty full of swine.

Expand full comment

We therefore have two test groups: ministers vs jabbed, and can measure the longevity in both of these groups.

Expand full comment

VERY well put, and agreed! Sir

Expand full comment

We think alike. And I'm pretty sure that many think the same.

Ray

Expand full comment

Actually they did know how bad it would be because the previous trials with the same technology MRNA + Nano lipids killed all test animals. Not one or two - all animals. The only reason why the damage varies with the shots is that they cannot ensure the same "quality" for each batch. Some batches are worse than others and I would not put it beyond these sick creatures to have some jabs just being saline to have a way to estimate the damage. Profit was clearly one of the driving factors but control and population reduction were the others. Recommending the jab to pregnant women without any testing is as evil as it gets but it does reduce the birth rate overall.

Expand full comment

And that applies to the creation of Sars2 as well, a virus deliberately made worse by scientists fully aware of the risk and horror. We tend to downplay virus effects because they were exaggerated so badly, but I think the effects are cumulative - most get the virus spike as well as at least 60 days of spike from the jabs. It may be cumulative spike which is causing death and disease. But the underlying disease causing death is still scientists love of money and power.

Expand full comment

Given the fact that Moderna had some of the sequences found in the SARS2 virus patented before the scamdemic, I would say that those behind the jabs probably had a big role to play in the SARS2 virus development. I do not believe in coincidences and I would not be surprised if this was brought about to usher in the "Great Reset" that that psycho Swab talked about.

Expand full comment

Absolutely the gain of deadly function virus and the experimental "vaccinations" went hand in hand. Gain of deadly function viruses are bioweapons, and a vaccine is needed to protect the home population.

Expand full comment

Spot on - we are dealing with weaponized viruses. I think that what is most offensive about the whole mess is that there was a decision made by the US Congress to stop this sort of nightmare research during Obama's second term and utter filth like Fauci used every trick in the book to get it continued despite the ban in place. For this issue alone, Fauci, Collins and the rest of the clique need to be facing, at best, life in solitary confinement.

Expand full comment

My thoughts exactly, Sir!

Expand full comment

It is easy for the medicos (who learn very few good bedside manners) to do this sort of thing. Medicine is not a 'warm & fuzzy' profession. It's usually cold, clinical - and appointments are short! PLUS medicos are told "vaccination = good" at University and most never even question it. So it's really quite logical for them to get their patients jabbed.

Mainstream medical people are also not reading the proper science like we are. They're not aware of what we're aware of. They're living in their own private land where Big Pharma is God and they & their patients must pray at the altar. We're living in parallel universes.

As for those who think up and design these jabs? They're scientists, the same type of scientists who would happily get in a boat over highly acid waters in a volcanic crater to collect a specimen of acidic 'water'!! Forget that the acidic waters might eat away the boat while they're doing this. Forget what potentially harmful fumes they might breathe in on the way. Nah, these scientists are SOOOO fascinated by being able to do this or that in the small picture that they miss the big picture entirely. And the Big Picture now is that there are excessive deaths - and they are very likely to continue.

People are people are they're not much good at Due Diligence!

Expand full comment

I am afraid that your are correct about the medicos. They are supposed to be the critical thinkers of the world and unfortunately they are doing the opposite. It is frightening how the medical care evolved over the past three decades from the one to one doctor to patient relationship to the current nightmare in which the doctors get told what they can or cannot do. It is astounding that the medicos do not grasp that this will make them redundant in the near future. What is the point in seeing a doctor if they can only do exactly what some pencil pusher has decided based on cost or some other stupid government factors? For the medicos to keep going along with this is like turkeys voting for an early Thanksgiving day.

Expand full comment

Ha ha ha love your turkey analogy!

Yes, in Australia the Health Practitioner National Law has just been changed (with NO consultation of any of our 800K+ registered health practitioners) so that ALL health professionals are meant to toe the line and only use 'reputable evidence' that is ALSO in line with the Public Message.

I'm in agreement with you: what's the point of seeing ANY registered health professional (not just medicos) in Oz if the pencil pushers are deciding what's going on?! Bugger that for a lark. I'm all for Patient Care! You do what's right for the patient, not what serves the (wrong) Public Message. I didn't sign up so I could uphold our totalitarian government's ideologies. No. I signed up to serve the patients - with the TRUTH and what HELPS them. Anything other than that and it's lies and corruption and fraud and probably lots of other things - but not best patient care, which is what it SHOULD be about.

As for medicos being 'critical thinkers' - some are. But not most. Same with many health professionals these days. Critical Thinkers are a dying breed!

Expand full comment

"it is difficult to grasp how someone with medical skills would do something this - the people behind the jabs KNEW the likely outcomes both short and long term and still went ahead with them anyway."

The difficulty resides within a category error, Miko.

There is a common misconception that there is no significant difference between medical researchers and medical practitioners. The overlapping category of "possessing medical skills" is the confounding element.

A practitioner seeks the optimal outcome for the single, unique individual they are evaluating and treating.

A researcher seeks expansion of knowledge. Individual outcomes are of interest only insofar as they confirm or refute validity of the discovered knowledge.

There is some overlap between the two categories, because human motivations have multivariate aspects and origins, but the categories are distinct.

Further on in your excellent comment, you reference the monster Josef Mengele. He was a consummate researcher and his findings were quietly integrated with the corpus of scientific knowledge. By the time Pozos objected to the use of his data in 1988, it had already become part of the contributing information to innumerable other research efforts. And that's just the data. The organs and tissue his team provided to their contemporaries were used in countless other, unrelated, research projects and experiments.

I'm not saying that even a significant percentage of medical researchers are monsters like Mengele, but data is data and researchers must fulfill their purpose, which is to leverage ALL available information in pursuit of their objectives.

There is, however, one correlation that bears mentioning, and that is the seductive lure of arrogantly messianic motivation. In the context of a utilitarian calculus, such motivation incentivises the type of thinking that deliberately obscures misery and death, in pursuit of what is deemed a "noble" cause. If a treatment kills four people and heals six, it has achieved utilitarian efficacy; six is greater than four, and thus has the "greater good" been served.

I can recall no more vivid an example of the dangers associated with the above category error, Than the response to the Wuhan Coronavirus. Indeed, it's very existence may be the result of arrogantly messianic motives.

Anyway, thanks for your post, you have expressed the concerns of many, including myself.

Expand full comment

I do not buy into the "I am researcher only and the data is the data" explanation. I have worked in research for over 20 years and I have been asked to look into things that were clearly aimed at unauthorised surveillance and target acquisition for missiles. In both cases I chose NOT to do it because I would not be able to sleep well at night knowing that my work would lead to something completely evil. The money was fantastic and so were the promotion incentives. In my case, it was not medically related research and I still did not do it. The fact that there are people out there with medical skills that have no morality and look at everything in terms of "pure data" only demonstrates that they are in the wrong field and should never be allowed to work in medicine ever. The "Do no harm" approach should be applicable to all not just the practitioners.

Expand full comment

I'm going to suggest the possibility that your personal code of honor correlates with your presence in, and contributions to, forums such as this one, Miko.

"The "Do no harm" approach should be applicable to all not just the practitioners."

I tend to agree.

Your own experience of refusing to conduct research that, when successful, creates more evil in the world, appears to highlight one of the mechanisms that form what Arendt referred to as "the banality of evil."

Your refusal to participate in that sort of research is an example of why humanity is not beyond redemption. Others will succumb to the incentives and create misery and death, but while there remain people of conscience like you, hope remains.

Thank you for a thought-provoking response. The issue of utilitarianism in research (and life, generally,) is a complex one. It has nuances and layers of meaning that require honest exploration.

There is an argument for maintaining the categorical distinction between practitioner and researcher. Assuming that argument valid, just for the sake of discussion, we come back to the classic trolley problem. "Do no harm" equates to refusing to pull the lever, regardless of how many people are tied to each of the two tracks.

The comparison of the response to medical threat with war, seems to mandate a similar utilitarian framework. It's the classic "some must die so that a majority can survive" calculus.

What most of us want, I think, is honesty from those who make those decisions. There remains the confounding factor that refusal to decide is a decision in and of itself.

The harmful response to threat was a purely political one, assuming honesty from the research community. The researchers provide the calculus, the agents of the state apply it to the decision-making process.

On one side of the equation was the virus, on the other side were economic and medical considerations (leaving aside the political freedom aspects.) What we experienced were political decisions informed by means of ignoring every factor but the virus. This resulted in an imbalance of harms. Those entrusted with the trolley lever never even counted the number of people tied to each track and then pulled the lever anyway.

Expand full comment

infertility and spontaneous abortions may go on for years as well

Expand full comment

Yes. I was limiting myself to the topic of the day. I have been extraordinarily lucky in that I already have 8 grandchildren from 3 of my children (7 whose parents were vaccinated after they were 3-10 years old, and one from my son and his wife who aren't jabbed, who is 4 months old)...and I am certain that they will never be forced to be jabbed, so they are as safe as possible, at least from the present threat.

Expand full comment

Maybe you don't want to outlive any of your children, but every combatant is needed to fight this multi-tentacled menace to mankind. Your children might succumb in front of you. A horrible experience to be sure. But EVERYONE is either a child of someone, a great many have children they love and brought up, only to see them suffer. This MUST be ironed out in a most dramatic and effective way, so that the future generations (if they are even a potential) can have life.

Ray

Expand full comment
Nov 14, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

Mortality is getting worse, by those paying any attention such as insurance and funeral companies. 5G installations are happening everywhere all the time, (see images from NY etc.) so those that did not die quickly are beginning to be picked off while they are holding their phones. The injected nano tubes have a patent that explains how they take 5G signal and amplify it, thats what the DOD designed nano tubes to do, and folks are now full of em. So, yeah, the deaths will continue to mount, all causes. Good luck contestants!

Expand full comment

Jacquelyn, I was just reading about a book called "Earthing", promoting the health benefits of contacting the ground with your bare skin (such as your feet). The top-rated review was written in 2016: https://www.amazon.com/gp/customer-reviews/RM46TKNYETJA9/ref=cm_cr_dp_d_rvw_ttl?ie=UTF8&ASIN=1591203740

The author of that review left an update from April, 2019. Sit down while you read this: "Update: 4/19/19 - People should research the 5G network that is going to be put in. Some very nefarious stuff going on. Some interesting things to look at with regard to the 5G network and vaccines/nanotech."

Interesting indeed. What did he know and how did he know it?

Expand full comment
Nov 14, 2022·edited Nov 14, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

Thank you Surak...seems patents help explain alot of this....See any recent interviews with Karen Kingston, her substack also. She has done many interviews in the last few months. One thing about patents I have heard is that they are notoriously inaccurate in important ways, in that inventors often leave out or obscure key concepts so as to protect their idea, despite the fact they are patenting it at the same time. So patents are only so reliable, but they do seem to be pointing to many years of work in by the gov and partners in making nasties. Look up when you are at car intersections, many new little boxy things up on top of poles and such. Citizens have no say or warning before one might appear right in their window in an American city. Even if its not real, it works pretty great as a psyop anyway. But I am 'perty' sure it is. I also wonder about the power grids knowing of course these towers probably have their own power supplies and maybe solar panels. I am not sure what would happen when the grid goes down. Even locating towers in your area is tricky, most of the info is on pro 5g sites....but not sure if anyone has mapped it out privately. Looking. Best from Oregon.

Expand full comment

Locating towers in Canada is simple, they are all mapped and provided onine. Same in the US isn't it? There is nothing particularly sinister about carbon nanotubes. In terms of the vax/COVID, I'm more concerned about the proteins it contains than some wild unproven speculation about nanotubes. If you wanted to wipe out humanity, you wouldn't propose to build the 5G network, mass inject people and then kill them using 5G. You could just design the vax to give large numbers of people heart disease and cancer. That's very deniable for a very long time.

Also, there is no evidence, let alone proof that any actor was trying to terminate humanity. This is most likely a military led modification of research work that escaped and mutated. Which military? Which research? Those are the questions we need to answer so we can stop this from occurring again, AND we need some professional statisticians to look at the data that Igor has been working on, so our governments and medical community stop making the problem worse.

Expand full comment

Don't disagree with anything you wrote, but if you really wanted to wipe out a huge chunk of the population, you'd inject people with a prion (or the mRNA of such), which has 100% mortality but won't manifest for a decade.

This why without independent sequencing of mRNA lots, I'd never get injected, even if it actually was safe...

Expand full comment

Yes, that's a scary thought. Looking back, a fundamental question we should be asking is 'Why use MRNA technology? Why not use older methods such as deactivating COVID itself? '

While I do think that MRNA tech might be very useful in treating deadly diseases like cancer where you are going to die anyway, it's an unimaginable risk to test this unproven tech on 25% of the world population. The largest clinical trial in history without an IRB.

And Igor, kudos to you for doing this research and publishing it.

Expand full comment

Pre-COVID, I was a big proponent of most biotechnology (and have a degree in it), but the amount of malfeasance that I've seen, and the insane profit motives involved in fudging data for the owners of the technology has given me pause.

It is a good question you ask. I don't think I've received a good answer why we couldn't have just expressed the spike protein (or safer yet, the nucleocapsid protein) in bacteria or yeast and spun it up in a large scale bioreactor, and purified the protein extract. We've been doing that for decades. It would seem to be much safer, as every person is going to produce a different quantity of spike from mRNA, based on their individual biology.

One factor I want to mention in passing is an additional biosecurity issue with mRNA versus a protein based vaccine, which is a protein based vaccine would be relatively difficult to engineer nefariously, as there is a biological organism involved and gene constructs that must be made, along with a product whose molecular weight can be verified, sequenced, etc. mRNA on the other hand allows one to simply tweak the sequence of nucleotides being constructed, using whatever computer program they developed, and then simply have that evidence deleted after the fact. If one were to insert a prion motif into the code, as long as the same number of nucleotides are being used as the original intended product, the nucleotide feedstocks would balance out, and any supervisors would be none the wiser, as all the ingredients would remain account for. This would potentially allow for one or two individuals to do some serious damage on a global scale, if safety procedures are not put in place. Frankly, I highly doubt they have even thought about this possibility. Well, its been said now...

Expand full comment

In reference to this sentence….“Also, there is no evidence, let alone proof that any actor was trying to terminate humanity.” Weave into the backdrop of all this science/not science, is Luciferianism and satanist mindsets who very much strive to see death and destruction.

Expand full comment
Nov 14, 2022·edited Nov 14, 2022

I would be very carefull with people that say: "Nothing to see here" and "Look the otherway" or there is no proof. These actors infiltrate the comments to put you on a side track, away from reality. Especialy on sites where Big Tech can't sensor.

Expand full comment

I believe 5G towers are a threat to privacy. Especially combined with smart phones. The Internet of Things.

Expand full comment
Nov 14, 2022·edited Nov 14, 2022

the litmus test for everyone is Spike Protein ...

Expand full comment

Logan's run

Expand full comment
Nov 14, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

Capricorns ...

Expand full comment

What about us Capricorns???? ;)

Expand full comment

But this isn't only for 30 year olds.

Expand full comment

I still think people are making this up about nanotubes in the c-vax and 5G. I do not believe it and considerer it disinformation propaganda.

Expand full comment

I'd suggest reading the The Electric Rainbow, 2017 edition. It documents the toxic nature of EMF on all life, not just us, and has changed my view of electricity the way the book Turtles All Way Down changed my view of vaccines.

Remember 5G started rolling out same time as C19.

Expand full comment

I’ve been driving from middle of Oregon to Seattle area for almost 5 years now to visit my family and I will tell you the 5G towers have popped up everywhere along I5 in the last two years... It’s disheartening at best

Expand full comment

Yes because data speed falls off quickly with distance with the higher speeds of 5G. That's why they have more towers. It's physics, not the government trying to kill you.

Expand full comment

Yes the government would never do anything to harm its populace...

Expand full comment

I used to do that drive, from southern Oregon. I remember when all the cell phone antennae started littering the highway

Expand full comment

When I was a kid proliferating highway litter was billboards ... been a while. 😁🇺🇸

Expand full comment

It was an eye opening book.

Expand full comment

You are welcome to.

Expand full comment

Funny you say that.

Check Dr Ana Maria mihalcea substack

Expand full comment
Nov 14, 2022·edited Nov 14, 2022

dr chetty covered it from the start ... here is another one ...

https://rumble.com/v1qhqps-october-29-2022.html

Expand full comment

As I’ve mentioned before, the purpose of microwaves is pulsing them in multiple frequencies, focusing with phase interference.

It is not the intensity but the pulsing that is the potential bio hazard. For example a single bright spot of light is annoying but you can ignore it. However a bright strobe light can cause hypnotic response or inability to concentrate or even seizers.

Not suggesting that there is a problem but cell phone safety has always been based on intensity of the signal not the rate the signal flashes. Certainly hundreds of flashing microwave signals around us is not a benefit.

Note that microwaves are longer than red light and penetrate cloths and skin & bone. Human mitochondria generate hormones for use within cells, melatonin for anti oxidant is one, these molecules are made with red light. I have no idea if cell phone transmitters effect these processes ... and neither does anyone else.

Expand full comment

I'm sorry, but most of this stuff is firmly in the lunatic fringe. There is often a tiny grain of truth here (e.g. that in certain cases, radio (RF) energy can be harmful.) And yes, it's true that the long-term effects of lower level RF are poorly studied. How could they be, when they have only been in use at best a few decades?

Not saying you are an agent, but it's a time honored technique of intelligence and other agencies to deliberately promote false narratives within a group in an attempt to confuse or discredit the opposition. To use the present topic of "vaccine" safety, to rave about self-assembling killer machines in the blood controlled by nefarious 5G networks is firmly in cloud cuckoo land. Where's your proof? At the other end, we have far more reasonable worries, such as the loss of civil rights, the capture of institutions by Pharma and, yes, the WEF and its cronies. At a practical level, we have much firmer evidence of harm (injury, death) caused by the vaccines. These are the higher priority, and precisely what we must concentrate upon. The powers in the shadows would love splinter groups to continue pushing the less likely ideas, as it turns attention away from the dumpster fire as well as casts doubt on the the skeptic movement.

Expand full comment

This will be hidden way down here in the branching replies.

My post however was not entirely correct. Some people are not only curious about low level metabolic effects of microwaves but are actively trying to figure it out.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4440565/

Expand full comment

pandelis, thanks

had not heard of dr chetty....

La Quinta Columna has stated that the vials they looked at

do not even contain proteins, or other biological

things, but rather nano gel with metals,

self assembling circuitry on various exposures

to air and wavelegnth, heat.

The contents of vials could vary wildly, both by

things on purpose and accidentally. Lethality by

any means still lethality, probably in more than

one way, if the eugenicists did their homework

which it seems they did. I only hope their

systems turn out to be as fragile as their egos.

Expand full comment

what if everybody's right?

Expand full comment

I go with “multiple vectors of attack”. The variety of findings from 26+ independent vax contents analysis found lots of disturbing things including

self assembling things which are stimulated by EMF. I haven’t read the entire 132 page document yet (will link to it later, Stasha Ladypova referred to it in her “garbage soup” interview with Tessa Lena, on one of her slides), but from all I’ve encountered so far, micro/nanotechnology, spike protein toxicity, LNP toxicity, AI bioweapon (generic term from Karen Kingston that is consistent with other things), synthetic venom peptide poisoning, toxic metal poisoning (including Cesium, likely part of a signaling technology), graphene sheets/nanotubes, parasites both organic (trypanis cruzi if I spelled it right) and synthetic, various gene deletion/editing CRISPR technologies, signaling technologies like Luciferase, and the formation of giant clots with high concentrations of conductive metals all can be/ are involved.

There is obviously some overlap in the above but since these MTSIs (mystery toxic sludge injections) as I call them can have anything at all in them, that can be changed at any time, who really knows all of it? One interesting finding has been lack of organic building block elements like Phosphorus, leading to the conclusion that there was no mRNA in the examined vials. Again, who knows how widespread that would be.

Expand full comment
Nov 14, 2022·edited Nov 14, 2022

difficult to tell always

Expand full comment

What if everybody is completely wrong? Everybody being right is impossible.

Everybody being wrong is very probable.

Expand full comment

"I still think people are making this up about nanotubes in the c-vax and 5G. I do not believe it and considerer it disinformation propaganda."

I do hope you are correct. I also recall, however, several covid hypotheses which i thought absurd or crazy just 2 1/2 years ago have turned out to be true. Life now is like this joke:

Q: What's the difference between a conspiracy theory and the truth?

A: Usually about 6 to 12 months.

:-)

Expand full comment

Just in case you are right... Change your phone settings to not use 5G. Pick the lower connection speed option instead. It works fine for me.

Expand full comment
Nov 14, 2022·edited Nov 14, 2022

I have a 4g landline since a few months ago. So I don't carry a phone now, it's nice not to have to charge the thing either I do have to say. Not a big deal to print maps of where i need to go in the car, and it makes me review the route first which is helpful to my brain. The cost is about 15 a month for the new phone, from a company called Ooma, I suspect it is not a perfect solution but it seems at least better, in terms of some privacy. RE the 5G kill towers, It's not me who would be right or wrong, but rather Karen Kingston and a good cluster of the alt media. It seems funny how many new dealybobs there are on the power poles these days, keep your head up... thanks Pablo

Expand full comment
Nov 14, 2022·edited Nov 14, 2022

alt media is full of disinfo ...

Expand full comment

I consulted a naturopath for alternative medical advice. I consider some of it "fringe." But it was appropriate to her business, which offers spas, meditation, alternative treatments and suchlike. Much of her consultation in fact covered the -- alleged -- risks of RF from cell phone, wifi and the like. I cannot dismiss RF as a potential health risk, but I am very skeptical. I have a "hard science" background and believe it or not, worked for many years in IT. I have some idea of how radio waves really behave. Even if you have zero electronic devices in your home, you still won't be free of the risks, since outside antennas will still beam some RF into your home.

If you accept that RF-generating accessories are essential, but you fear damage, you can still minimize your risks. The main issue is how much you wish to inconvenience yourself. For example, you could treat a cell phone more like a traditional phone. If you are physically distant from it most of the time, even several feet, you greatly reduce the amount of RF exposure it sends out. If you're really paranoid, put it in airplane mode or even turn off when not needing to make or receive a call.

I try to approach questions of harm reduction practically, considering the known or likely risks. For example, if your mission is to give yourself the best chances of health, near the top of the list would be things like avoiding the bad (smoking, drinking to excess, illegal drugs, exposure to known pollutants and other risky behavior), eating a sensible diet, moderate exercise, vitamins and supplements.

Worrying about RF risks is very far down the list. In my opinion, worrying about it is like the man who smokes two packs a day and fears the cancer risk from radon seeping into his basement. Priorities, people, priorities!

Expand full comment

Did that reduction (5g>4g) on my last phone upgrade. Was also recommended to do so by the Store owner.

Expand full comment

how do I do this?

Expand full comment

If you have an android phone, go to phone "Settings" , then "Network & Internet" then "Mobile network" then under "Calling" you should see the on-off options for Wi-Fi calling, 2G and 5G.

I only have turned on the "2G" and leave the other two off. But older phones may not have the 5G option... Then, it is not connected to 5G.

Expand full comment

My question is why do we even need 5g to begin with? I don't know about you, but I reached nearly instantaneous internet at 4g, and don't need or want an upgrade.

Technology is an organism in and of itself. It relentlessly "gets better" as an essential function of it's life blood regardless of whether or not the people want it. Highly recomm nd The Technological Society by Jacques Ellul for more on this topic. The flip side of this is that safety often is a secondary concern, and the adage leave good enough alone has been forgotten completely

Realizing how fast technology has destroyed my focus and made my ADHD so much worse, I tried to downgrade my phone to an old Nokia e71 recently only to find that they are federally shutting down the 3g network immanently, and no old phones will work on it. Sad to say, they'll probably be shutting down the 4g network in a decade, and then we are stuck with 5g and whatever ungodly thing technology comes up with next. I weep for humanity and am beginning to think the Amish and luddites were onto something ages ago.

Expand full comment

Thank you Censored, I feel the same, we could be content with our current internet speeds and maybe focus on some other issues to solve. Where indeed does our quest for speed stop? I am reminded of a Darwin award winner who strapped a rocket engine to his car just to see what happened. His car ended up crumpled unrecognizably high up on a cliff face, they estimated he had been going about 600 mph. So cool /s!

I think the push to do lots of school upgrades and renovations (97217) is to get the 5G into the schools so I hope folks really pull their kids out, if only for that reason, exposure. Honestly, how much can they hate us? Let me count the ways.

I guess if they end the 4g I will be phoneless by choice. Life is so much better without a cell phone, imo. I meet lots more folks, and I do find that many are enjoying looking at faces and not cell phone screens. Poor youth, what horrid examples we have set for them. Best

Expand full comment

They may well be.

I believe the FCC wanted the broad lower frequencies back for other applications.

5G = Better tech, faster streaming of “bachelor” or whatever right to your phone and much better geolocation of the user without GPS.

Expand full comment

...all of which you the alleged "victim," can refuse to participate in, as simply as by turning off your phone when you don't need it. Obviously you can't use whatever services your phone provide, while it's shut off.

Expand full comment

Does this mean that the cities, which typically are chock-full of leftists and have a higher density of phone cells, will experience greater mortality than those of us who live in rural or suburban areas?

Expand full comment

One can only hope ;)

Expand full comment
Nov 14, 2022·edited Nov 14, 2022

🤞🏼🤞🏼🤞🏼 One can hope. (Kidding— kind of…)

The bible

says, “Woe, woe to those living in cities, where houses are built upon houses…” in the last days. I always assumed it was because of pestilence and disease running amok. Perhaps it’s this as well.

Expand full comment

The cities have many more jabbed too.

Expand full comment

Exactly! 😈

Expand full comment
Nov 14, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

In short, the jabs kill. --Igor Chudov

Expand full comment
Nov 14, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

Great stuff, Igor. The vaxxed vs. unvaxxed studies are unlikely to come from official sources. Reading "Turtles All the Way Down" just now, and the CDC won't even do vaxxed vs. unvaxxed studies on all the childhood vaxxes. EVERY study of safety was done against OTHER vaxxes, NOT true placebos. Crazy stuff.

Expand full comment
Nov 14, 2022·edited Nov 15, 2022

“Studying” vax against another vax is tantamount to, “We gave the kids some gin. The gin had no worse affect than did the vodka. So drinking is good for children.”

Expand full comment
Nov 14, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

Just received Turtles all the Way Down, on Friday. Finishing up, The New Abnormal.

Expand full comment
Nov 14, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

There are those that say that the immune system of the vaxxed is permanently damaged. I think it will be expressed in at least two-- if not more-- different ways. Some will just be sick all the time, and die things like pneumonia, while others won't get colds, they'll wake up one day with stage 4 cancer. The really lucky ones will just get palsy and autoimmune disorders.

Expand full comment

The bigger fear facor is that all that took even 1 dose have suffered degrees of myocarditis damage to their heart tissue in the 1st 48 hrs post Vax.

That makes everyone vaxxed a delayed walking heart attack risk.

I believe this mass wave of death is in the next 2-5 years.

And this was calculated by the evil cabal. And now big Pharma announced THEY want to begin "studies" on such a phenomenal.

Expand full comment

Myocarditis

Once the heart muscle is damaged, it cannot be repaired by the body. Within five years of diagnosis, the death rate from myocarditis is 50%

Pericarditis

Without treatment, the survival rate of constrictive pericarditis is low. After a pericardiectomy, 78% of people can live five years and 57% live another 10 years.

Expand full comment
Nov 14, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

"I do not own such a demographics institute, so I use the data I can find."

There's so much in this statement. You SHOULD own such a demographics institute because the US government is a servant of the people, in theory. But, our corrupt, captured, institutions, aren't working on our behalf. Instead, we have independent, individual, prophets like you Igor doing the best they can.

Shame on our government. Shame on our agencies. I had hoped the midterms would reveal the corruption of our apparatchiks, but no. Shame on the American voters. I fear a substantial portion of this country simply wants handouts and strong cannabis.

Expand full comment

And also Republicans standing down, thus far, in the face of obvious massive election fraud. Hopefully I’ll be wrong about that in the end, but 2020 set a horrible precedent.

Expand full comment
Nov 14, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

I think the vaccines were intended to kill the vulnerable quickly and put a ticking time bomb on everyone else along with a reduction in fertility. Why would governments support this? One of their biggest expenditures is pensions...by far. With the implosion of global economies off the back of a 100 years or so on money printing, the economic reckoning is arriving. They know this and need to cut expenditure where they can. Why lower the birth rate? Perhaps to justify migration. Better to have hard working compliant immigrants than demanding entitled citizens. A low birth rate justifies adopting an open border policy to support an economy.

Expand full comment

Dismantling of everything. Kill most of the people. Destroy national identity, culture and community. Destroy personal identity with masks and brainwashing. Destroy personal relationships and livelihoods to increase dependency on the global totalitarian state being prepared.

Expand full comment

While your argument makes sense...I don't see in the real world that many "hard working compliant immigrants". Sure most eastern europeans are hardworking, but from what I've seen a LARGE portion of African immigrants and some of the Middle Eastern have no work ethics and prefer to stay in their own communities benefitting from government aid.

So, while culling the existing western european populations ( I include here any of the western like countries from USA to Europe to AUZ, NZ to Japan, South Korrea, Taiwan, etc) to eliminate the possibility of rebellion (and eliminating a host of other issues they might create) might look good on paper to the lizard people, they will NOT get hard working compliant immigrant replacements.

Expand full comment

Immigrants tend to vote for those who give them handouts and therefore keep those with open border policies in power. What they also do is the menial work that native populations won’t (care work, rubbish collection, restaurant work, farm work etc.). I’m making a broad statement, and there are obviously exceptions, but in opinion that is why business and government like open borders while citizens do not.

Expand full comment

Yeah, agree with your broad statement :)

Maybe in the US it's different in regards to immigrants (most are hardworking?) but in Europe I would say most are not hardworking (except eastern europeans and indians, sikhs)...but they do make excellent voters for the party that gives them handouts

Expand full comment

They might, however, get some compliant hired thugs who will do anything for money, though.

Expand full comment

Another ingeniously simple and elegant argument. While I am not happy about the conclusion of these essays, they provide an archetype of what clear thinking should be.

Expand full comment
author

Trust me I am also very unhappy for general AND personal reasons

Expand full comment

Igor, I performed simple analysis of some current government data in Canada. Seems to show a relationship between hospitalizations and vax status. https://open.substack.com/pub/crowdsourcingthetruth/p/govt-admits-boosters-more-hospitalizations?r=z7a89&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post

Expand full comment
Nov 14, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

This is something I’ve been interested in. Our local hospital was showing vax-status of covid hospitalizations to try and coerce the unvaxxed into getting it but what I wanted to know (along with all the other people who didn’t get the jab) was all hospitalizations by vaccine status. That would have been much more interesting and helpful.

Expand full comment
Nov 14, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

In Canada a lot of provinces stopped giving vaxxed/unvaxxed data on hospitalised or died of covid patients, because most of them were vaxxed, especially boosted. Hit up yakkstack on substack and go back to spring/summer for some decent data.

Expand full comment
Nov 14, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

Our hospital eventually stopped publicizing the stats as well, and I’m pretty sure we all knew why. At first, they could classify someone as unvaxxed, even if they had received one or two because of the little loophole they created. After everyone had gotten their vaccine and had passed the 14 day waiting period after the second dose, the hospital decided not to publish anymore. It’s so ridiculous. I can’t imagine how much cognitive dissonance these people have to live with.

Expand full comment

They did the same thing here - people were officially unvaxxed until 2 weeks after their shot. They also insisted that the unvaxxed death rate was highest, as they added in everyone who died from the start of the pandemic, i.e. a good year and a half before most were vaccinated.

Expand full comment

So much fraud at every turn

Expand full comment

Yes, the blinds have been pulled down on most Canadian COVID data with vax status. It took a fair bit of scouring the internet to find these few data that I have referenced.

Expand full comment

CBC and CTV both had headlines this morning stating 15 New Covid Deaths in Nova Scotia. Upon reading the article, the deaths did not occur in the past 2 weeks. When asked when the deaths occurred the information was not available.

Expand full comment
Nov 14, 2022·edited Nov 14, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

Good point. The data I analyzed is for COVID hospitalizations but regardless nobody would be compelled to get boosted based on what the data shows.

Expand full comment
Nov 14, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

Got it. Yes, that’s especially not good if it’s specifically regarding COVID hospitalization after vaccine boosters. Wouldn’t it be great to know all hospitalizations based on any covid vaccine? I think that would open the door for criminal charges so we will probably never have access to that data.

Expand full comment
Nov 14, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

"Will excess mortality get better or worse over time?"

That's the big question for me - will my family members who got the shots a year ago be OK? No one except for a couple of them are getting boosted.

A brother-in-law got forced by Australia to get the shots a little over a year ago, and three months ago developed a turbo cancer in his thyroid. Now his wife has "trigeminal neuralgia", which is a known immediate side effect of the shots, but for her it's a year later.

It's like I'm just waiting for the next health problem in them to pop up, and it's happening more often now.

Expand full comment
Nov 14, 2022·edited Nov 14, 2022

My tech loving older sister was early on the injections and not sure how many she took. But at 16 months later she also got "trigeminal neuralgia". When they did more scans, she quickly showed brain cancer. She only lasted for 2 months from the TG diagnosis. She used her cell phone a lot, so probably a contributor. Her house also wired for wi-fi. 24/7. Very sad. No history of cancer in our family. Ryan Cole's info. on fast developing cancer(s) seems apropos. Sorry to say, I think mortality will definitely get worse, and we're just getting started. Only two out of twenty family members, are truebloods. I did everything I could to warn in Summer '20. (Now, silence.)

Expand full comment

So sorry...they think they are doing what’s best.

Expand full comment

I’m sorry for your loss! “True bloods” is an interesting term and apropos. Maybe Truebloods vs Mudbloods will be a defining factor of longevity and social/business value by governments in the future.

Expand full comment

TKU :)....my sister had a great and long life actually, except for the end. Reasonably intelligent and very capable but she lived in a bubble with as many as would join her there. Covid+ what came next, was truly a "Fools rush in where angels fear to tread" scenario, and family group think at its very worst. The grandmother who I am most like and named for, ironically ( or presciently) had the maiden name of Trueblood. I always liked it.

Expand full comment

Heirlooms vs GMOs

Expand full comment

Thanks. I've never heard of it before.

Expand full comment
Nov 14, 2022·edited Nov 18, 2022

yes, there were quite a few people predicting it all.

Expand full comment

from Steve Kirsch' substack:

"Did Doug Brignole die from COVID or the vaccine?"

....

"The coroner did not take any tissue samples so we’ll never know for sure."

So a registry of people who demand autopsies if they die, and tissue samples taken as part of those autopsies, is needed.

I would have posted this as a comment to that article but its for paid subscribers only.

Expand full comment

When people die for no reason, asking their vaxx status is completely inappropriate. The only time that matters is if you want to go to a restaurant or get on a plane.

Expand full comment
founding

People always die for a reason. The lucky ones die of extreme old age.

When the evidence has become overwhelming, that the jabs are causing deaths, it is extremely inappropriate to hide the vax status when a young healthy person "suddenly and unexpectedly" dies. We want the detailed autopsy results, one that specifically checks for mRNA spike damage.

Suppose my child dies from in a bicycle accident due to a hidden and unexpected hole in the ground. Should I be able to hide the cause of death? How would you feel if I did so and your child fell into the same hole and died?

Your comment about restaurants and planes shows a blind belief that the jabs are safe and effective. They are not safe, proven by VAERS, and they are not effective as covid variants are spreading wildly in heavily jabbed countries, but not in countries with little vaccination. You are willfully blind to the facts. Go get another booster. Prove your blind faith and post a picture showing the injection claiming that you are getting boosted again in order to show the boosters are safe.

Expand full comment

I think he was being sarcastic

Expand full comment

dah ...

Expand full comment

My thoughts exactly

Expand full comment

People who have been injected but realize later that the injection might cause their death would register voluntarily. When they register they would either ask a trusted party to insist on the autopsy if they die in circumstances that suggest the injection was the cause, or the trusted party would be designated as part of the registry. I don't understand why you think anyone would be asked their staus inappropriately. These would be volunteers that do so to help others.

Expand full comment

I disagree. It is the only effective red pill tool that we have.

Vax status to death correlation is the only measure we have with no clinical control group data.

Expand full comment

This number of likes is interesting information if its real.

Is this confusion about the proposal? Concern for surviving family? What gives?

Expand full comment

It becomes very confusing when people make lengthy retorts to an obviously sarcastic statement. 🤣

Expand full comment

It wasn't that obviously sarcastic

Expand full comment

I was referring to someone else making a sarcastic remark (Baboon, in this case, and then the thread becoming confused when people responded at length.

Expand full comment

I know, that's what I was also referring to. Baboon's comment was not that obviously sarcastic. I see it now though. Ha ha.

Expand full comment
Nov 14, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

question, if the increased risk is 40%, does that result in total expected deaths equal to:

(expected deaths)(1+increased risk)(percent of populated injected)

so for a country with 85% injected:

(expected deaths)(1.4)(0.85) = 1.19 deaths.... a 19% increase for a year

aren't some countries showing these kind of numbers currently?

Expand full comment
author

Bingo!

Expand full comment

thats exactly what I thought, it tallies with the excess death % seen

Expand full comment

You need to include unvaxxed too. It should be 0.85*(120%) + 0.15*(85%) = 115% mortality.

Expand full comment
Nov 14, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

Interesting thing to consider is this is only over the short interim period. Over five years, with cancer or heart attacks, this rate could be far far higher

Expand full comment

Imagine how hard it will be in 5 years to claim that your cancer was caused by the vax.

Expand full comment

Under normal circumstances, I would say that yes, that would be the case. However, I do think that there are simply too many bodies to hide and the truth will be accepted in the near future. There are too many people dying already and some people have started to ask questions that were forbidden even 12 months ago.

Expand full comment

That is what really worries me. This could be only the tip of the iceberg and worst part about it is that the medicos are the most jabbed of all groups. To study medicine in Oz you need to "fully" vaccinated which means 5 jabs. In Canada they have already had tens of young doctors dropping dead. My bet is that this likely to be mirrored in other countries as well. As bad as some doctors are, it will be way worse without any doctors because they all been taken out of action by the jabs. This is a problem that will take decades to fix and right now, the governments are not fixing it, they are making it worse with the mandates.

Expand full comment

Couldn't agree more

Expand full comment

"Mr. Global" wants to collapse the medical system.

Expand full comment
Nov 14, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

I am running my own n=1 test. I did covid19 Ab tests since 2020. I had two negative tests and last month after catching covid in Aug I tested positive for Ab.

I personally feel I am better off. No therapies were offered, I did a few nasal rinses and treated with aspirin after a week. The worst part was the first week running a temp of 102. Never any serious chest congestion a few O2-ox measures that were 93 the first week. It’s a serious bug but I did not have to go to ER. No follow ups about it with my doctor.

Expand full comment

i would stay away from these test ... if they go to all these troubles with closures, mandates etc. dont you think tests are a good target to take over? i recall gates and soros bought earlier on a UK testing company for 41 million ... now don't think soros at his age is looking to make a few more takas.

Expand full comment
Nov 14, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov

This is grim, but I'm still glad you brought it up. I have friends and family who have, for one reason or another, taken the injection. Knowledge is the first step to helping them.

Expand full comment