Thank you Surak...seems patents help explain alot of this....See any recent interviews with Karen Kingston, her substack also. She has done many interviews in the last few months. One thing about patents I have heard is that they are notoriously inaccurate in important ways, in that inventors often leave out or obscure key concepts so …
Thank you Surak...seems patents help explain alot of this....See any recent interviews with Karen Kingston, her substack also. She has done many interviews in the last few months. One thing about patents I have heard is that they are notoriously inaccurate in important ways, in that inventors often leave out or obscure key concepts so as to protect their idea, despite the fact they are patenting it at the same time. So patents are only so reliable, but they do seem to be pointing to many years of work in by the gov and partners in making nasties. Look up when you are at car intersections, many new little boxy things up on top of poles and such. Citizens have no say or warning before one might appear right in their window in an American city. Even if its not real, it works pretty great as a psyop anyway. But I am 'perty' sure it is. I also wonder about the power grids knowing of course these towers probably have their own power supplies and maybe solar panels. I am not sure what would happen when the grid goes down. Even locating towers in your area is tricky, most of the info is on pro 5g sites....but not sure if anyone has mapped it out privately. Looking. Best from Oregon.
Locating towers in Canada is simple, they are all mapped and provided onine. Same in the US isn't it? There is nothing particularly sinister about carbon nanotubes. In terms of the vax/COVID, I'm more concerned about the proteins it contains than some wild unproven speculation about nanotubes. If you wanted to wipe out humanity, you wouldn't propose to build the 5G network, mass inject people and then kill them using 5G. You could just design the vax to give large numbers of people heart disease and cancer. That's very deniable for a very long time.
Also, there is no evidence, let alone proof that any actor was trying to terminate humanity. This is most likely a military led modification of research work that escaped and mutated. Which military? Which research? Those are the questions we need to answer so we can stop this from occurring again, AND we need some professional statisticians to look at the data that Igor has been working on, so our governments and medical community stop making the problem worse.
Don't disagree with anything you wrote, but if you really wanted to wipe out a huge chunk of the population, you'd inject people with a prion (or the mRNA of such), which has 100% mortality but won't manifest for a decade.
This why without independent sequencing of mRNA lots, I'd never get injected, even if it actually was safe...
Yes, that's a scary thought. Looking back, a fundamental question we should be asking is 'Why use MRNA technology? Why not use older methods such as deactivating COVID itself? '
While I do think that MRNA tech might be very useful in treating deadly diseases like cancer where you are going to die anyway, it's an unimaginable risk to test this unproven tech on 25% of the world population. The largest clinical trial in history without an IRB.
And Igor, kudos to you for doing this research and publishing it.
Pre-COVID, I was a big proponent of most biotechnology (and have a degree in it), but the amount of malfeasance that I've seen, and the insane profit motives involved in fudging data for the owners of the technology has given me pause.
It is a good question you ask. I don't think I've received a good answer why we couldn't have just expressed the spike protein (or safer yet, the nucleocapsid protein) in bacteria or yeast and spun it up in a large scale bioreactor, and purified the protein extract. We've been doing that for decades. It would seem to be much safer, as every person is going to produce a different quantity of spike from mRNA, based on their individual biology.
One factor I want to mention in passing is an additional biosecurity issue with mRNA versus a protein based vaccine, which is a protein based vaccine would be relatively difficult to engineer nefariously, as there is a biological organism involved and gene constructs that must be made, along with a product whose molecular weight can be verified, sequenced, etc. mRNA on the other hand allows one to simply tweak the sequence of nucleotides being constructed, using whatever computer program they developed, and then simply have that evidence deleted after the fact. If one were to insert a prion motif into the code, as long as the same number of nucleotides are being used as the original intended product, the nucleotide feedstocks would balance out, and any supervisors would be none the wiser, as all the ingredients would remain account for. This would potentially allow for one or two individuals to do some serious damage on a global scale, if safety procedures are not put in place. Frankly, I highly doubt they have even thought about this possibility. Well, its been said now...
In reference to this sentence….“Also, there is no evidence, let alone proof that any actor was trying to terminate humanity.” Weave into the backdrop of all this science/not science, is Luciferianism and satanist mindsets who very much strive to see death and destruction.
I would be very carefull with people that say: "Nothing to see here" and "Look the otherway" or there is no proof. These actors infiltrate the comments to put you on a side track, away from reality. Especialy on sites where Big Tech can't sensor.
Thank you Surak...seems patents help explain alot of this....See any recent interviews with Karen Kingston, her substack also. She has done many interviews in the last few months. One thing about patents I have heard is that they are notoriously inaccurate in important ways, in that inventors often leave out or obscure key concepts so as to protect their idea, despite the fact they are patenting it at the same time. So patents are only so reliable, but they do seem to be pointing to many years of work in by the gov and partners in making nasties. Look up when you are at car intersections, many new little boxy things up on top of poles and such. Citizens have no say or warning before one might appear right in their window in an American city. Even if its not real, it works pretty great as a psyop anyway. But I am 'perty' sure it is. I also wonder about the power grids knowing of course these towers probably have their own power supplies and maybe solar panels. I am not sure what would happen when the grid goes down. Even locating towers in your area is tricky, most of the info is on pro 5g sites....but not sure if anyone has mapped it out privately. Looking. Best from Oregon.
Locating towers in Canada is simple, they are all mapped and provided onine. Same in the US isn't it? There is nothing particularly sinister about carbon nanotubes. In terms of the vax/COVID, I'm more concerned about the proteins it contains than some wild unproven speculation about nanotubes. If you wanted to wipe out humanity, you wouldn't propose to build the 5G network, mass inject people and then kill them using 5G. You could just design the vax to give large numbers of people heart disease and cancer. That's very deniable for a very long time.
Also, there is no evidence, let alone proof that any actor was trying to terminate humanity. This is most likely a military led modification of research work that escaped and mutated. Which military? Which research? Those are the questions we need to answer so we can stop this from occurring again, AND we need some professional statisticians to look at the data that Igor has been working on, so our governments and medical community stop making the problem worse.
Don't disagree with anything you wrote, but if you really wanted to wipe out a huge chunk of the population, you'd inject people with a prion (or the mRNA of such), which has 100% mortality but won't manifest for a decade.
This why without independent sequencing of mRNA lots, I'd never get injected, even if it actually was safe...
Yes, that's a scary thought. Looking back, a fundamental question we should be asking is 'Why use MRNA technology? Why not use older methods such as deactivating COVID itself? '
While I do think that MRNA tech might be very useful in treating deadly diseases like cancer where you are going to die anyway, it's an unimaginable risk to test this unproven tech on 25% of the world population. The largest clinical trial in history without an IRB.
And Igor, kudos to you for doing this research and publishing it.
Pre-COVID, I was a big proponent of most biotechnology (and have a degree in it), but the amount of malfeasance that I've seen, and the insane profit motives involved in fudging data for the owners of the technology has given me pause.
It is a good question you ask. I don't think I've received a good answer why we couldn't have just expressed the spike protein (or safer yet, the nucleocapsid protein) in bacteria or yeast and spun it up in a large scale bioreactor, and purified the protein extract. We've been doing that for decades. It would seem to be much safer, as every person is going to produce a different quantity of spike from mRNA, based on their individual biology.
One factor I want to mention in passing is an additional biosecurity issue with mRNA versus a protein based vaccine, which is a protein based vaccine would be relatively difficult to engineer nefariously, as there is a biological organism involved and gene constructs that must be made, along with a product whose molecular weight can be verified, sequenced, etc. mRNA on the other hand allows one to simply tweak the sequence of nucleotides being constructed, using whatever computer program they developed, and then simply have that evidence deleted after the fact. If one were to insert a prion motif into the code, as long as the same number of nucleotides are being used as the original intended product, the nucleotide feedstocks would balance out, and any supervisors would be none the wiser, as all the ingredients would remain account for. This would potentially allow for one or two individuals to do some serious damage on a global scale, if safety procedures are not put in place. Frankly, I highly doubt they have even thought about this possibility. Well, its been said now...
In reference to this sentence….“Also, there is no evidence, let alone proof that any actor was trying to terminate humanity.” Weave into the backdrop of all this science/not science, is Luciferianism and satanist mindsets who very much strive to see death and destruction.
I would be very carefull with people that say: "Nothing to see here" and "Look the otherway" or there is no proof. These actors infiltrate the comments to put you on a side track, away from reality. Especialy on sites where Big Tech can't sensor.
I believe 5G towers are a threat to privacy. Especially combined with smart phones. The Internet of Things.
the litmus test for everyone is Spike Protein ...