Writing papers about why everyone needs to take dangerous experimental biotech for protection against an illness most everyone, especially under 50, are at no risk of:
But her relationship with the CDC Director who makes millions of dollars from hawking dangerous experimental biotech to everyone, even those at literally zero risk of illness like under 18 is COMPLETELY ethical!:
They're just a happy couple helping Americans and the world, no ethical conflicts of interest, not even the appearance of any ethical conflicts of interest!:
Not only lives with Fauci but has written papers with Zeke Emanuel on communitarianism, a political and social philosophy that aims to counter the individualism underlying Western societies by emphasizing a balance between individual and collective goals and values.
In short I think she believes the group outweighs individuals in say a fake pandemic. And we need to act accordingly.
I have seen a podcast with her. Very breezy and smarmy.
Smarm is the worst, fake, and oily, and way too smooth. I hate smarm. It's one of those words that's kind of onomatopoetically revealing if you know what I mean. In other words it even sounds disgusting. ;-)
When you know that the architects of our current health system, like Zeke Emanuel want us all to die at 75 - the end of our "usefulness" to society when our existence costs more than they think we're worth - forcing dangerous experimental biotech into the arms of the nation, world makes a lot more sense, now doesn't it?
Ironically, if modern "medicine" were not practially forced upon us (especially as we age,) most of us would not cost much at all to keep alive, healthy and contributing to the best of our ability into our 80s, 90s and even beyond. Just look at simpler societies where old folks in their 90s are gardening, going up and down stairs multiple times a day in a home they share with other generations of their family, caring for grandkids or even great-grandchildren while the parents work, etc. They are usually slender and quite agile compared to western society's elderly who are sedentary, arthritic, often warehoused in "care" homes, and loaded with degenerative diseases and all the drugs that are prescribed for those things.
On the other hand, as decrepit drug users, our western elderly could be considered quite valuable to big pharma... as long as there are younger taxpayers to foot the bill when the retirement accounts run dry.
Very well said. When I read docs are jabbing babies on day 1 of life with a Hep B vax in some preemptive strike, it revealed the pure profit motivation to create patients for life by altering the first defense against all diseases, a natural immune system. It's all we ever needed, but we're forced at birth to have it be compromised by pharma and brainwashed docs
Yes. I just discovered t yesterday Health Canada want to remove supplements and make vitamins outrageously expensive. Kill us all with a Nuke….now that would be honest
Also, that group outweighing the individual thing is of course, the root of much evil. And much suffering! Does mankind ever learn? "Oh I know, let's try communism again! This time we'll get it right!"
No, you're ignoring* my hinting at that intellectually understanding ethics (which is what people become equipped with when studying it academically) does not make people ethical actors themselves. They acquired a toolkit, and will use it according to their inclinations.
* and if it's for purpose of a joke, well it doesn't seem that much of a ripper to me, being based on an immediately apparent false dichotomy, but YMMV.
Much in the same way as Bill Gates display of the book "How to Lie With Statistics."
And your right that my non-ripper of a joke would distract from the actual point. That was not my intention, and I fully agree with your original premise.
Actually, many would agree she's qualified for ALL the Alphabet Agencies infested with Imperial-Feudal Fascist 'Deep State Minions' maneuvering as treasonous lairs...As well as all the Philanthropathic NGO's and 'The Council For Foreign Relations and National Security Council. THERE'S SO MANY INCESTUOUS ORGANIZATIONS BENT UPON FALLACY it's impossible to think of any of honor, integrity, Constitutional Law anywhere in the country.
True, totally, I fought the IRS for 40 years, an extremely corrupt organization, supported by the corrupt court system. You can find my book for free “why no one is required to file tax returns“ on the Internet, showing one of my main points.
It’s the ‘we’ part you’re going to have trouble with - likely not enough of them with their own…lead injectors and the will to use them. Meanwhile I’m thinking of dusting off those guillotine blue prints I got in Paris on my last visit… Well, one can dream can’t one?
Had a little bit of a hard time finding this book bc it’s out of print. But I found it and have perused the table of contents. Looks great! I can’t wait to read it. Thanks for the suggestion.
Definitely need to buy the book...Been wishing more info about the IRS, our Tax System which never passed in enough states to change the Constitution. Hm-m-m? Thank-you!
I understand. Occasionally it escapes my lips by social influence also. But that they are building to give their opinion, rather than their 'sweet nothing' - that itself is a signal that truth is coming where it may not usually.
Whenever I hear that opening cliche my immediate response is to say "So you're not usually..../Honesty is not your default..."
I used this most recently to a close family member, who then very surprisingly came back with what was probably the truth, saying she usually 'lies' to keep the peace. She justified it, saying she was in the role as the family's peace maker. I think I would've preferred the truth.
I was shocked by 'the truth' - it's not the usual reaction, although perhaps I pushed it a bit harder because I knew her well. Still I didn't expect it, and I wondered if it was the vaccine talking - a little loss of control.
Slightly off topic - same theme; never trust a MSM News outlet if it tells you "Why you can trust the BBC" - link only visible at the very foot of their website "front page" which rather gives the game away for me. I am sure readers here won't stand for the BBC's mendacity and I have personal evidence that their corrupt narrative is far more insidious than is evident in their so called News coverage..
LOL! That is a SURE signal! Any person/body who has a need to provide an explanation of why they/it can be trusted is fully aware that they are not typically, or should not be, trusted. :D
Yes, and anyone who "protests" too much about something others do. I signed a contract with a guy and he went on and on how he hated bullies. A year later he ghosts me with zero work product from him. Then 6 months after that he sues me! My lawyer and his deemed the suit frivolous, but I'm stuck with a $12,000 legal bill!
Red flag for me is when the small contractor or hair stylist says, “I can do anything you want.” Then experience their areas of no knowledge/experience.
Idk. People are multi faceted with sub personalities all living under the same nogin. The phrase may be used by a sub personality to energize an admission they might not usually express. Sometimes it may indicate a desire to set aside a persona or public face and say something that is real but often suppressed. The rest of the time people may use the phrase -- as the community here says -- to mislead. Igor’s description of the vase purchase could suggest a number of different motivations. First, it seems like he loved the vase and was afraid he was transmitting eagerness. So maybe Igor is telling the seller, hey I like this but I won’t pay a crazy price. On the other hand, diminishing the value of something in some cultures is a cue to the other guy to start bargaining. Maybe Igor prized the vase and wanted the seller to wake up and bargain it up a bit, so he did not get it as at a “steal” price! Maybe Igor was struggling with a desire to be more fair with the seller because of his big heart and he was arguing with the another hard nosed sub personality inside. To be sure, Igor has a conscience discussion around this story that is familiar to me. There is a concept in Jungian psychology of the Bright Shadow, which is the existence of a part Self that is positive and good, but hidden (denied) from the Ego and unacceptable to consciousness. Many people are unaware of their tender and loving nature because of early indoctrination. Those feelings are part of a bright shadow. For sure, the story of the Harvard scholars fall is complex and full of unconsciousness. It maybe a requirement of the academy membership in this sad age to be unconscious and narrowly focused. What honesty we have in us is there by the Grace of God.
And it is also a good idea to listen very closely to what these people say. Then you can get a real good idea of what it is. They're going to do and if history is any teacher it's usually not good
This story reminds me of the following. Who is this "ethics" professor really working for?
---
One young devil asked the old man: "How did you manage to bring so many souls to hell?"
The old devil answered: "I instilled fear in them!"
Answers the youngster: "Great job! And what were they afraid of? Wars? Hunger?"
Answers the man: "No, they were afraid of the disease!"
For this youngster: "Does this mean they didn't get sick? Are they not dead? There was no rescue for them?"
The old man answered: "But no ... they got sick, died, and the rescue was there."
The young devil, surprised, answered: "Then I don't understand?"
The old man answered: "You know they believed the only thing they have to keep at any cost is their lives. They stopped hugging, greeting each other. They've moved away from each other. They gave up all social contacts and everything that was human! Later they ran out of money, lost their jobs, but that was their choice because they were afraid for their lives, that's why they quit their jobs without even having bread.
"They believed blindly everything they heard and read in the papers. They gave up their freedoms, they didn't leave their own homes literally anywhere. They stopped visiting family and friends. The world turned into such a concentration camp, without forcing them into captivity. They accepted everything! Just to live at least one more miserable day ... And so living, they died every day! And that's how it was very easy for me to take their miserable souls to hell ..." --Author in Dispute
True. Years ago I realized evil people don't just step off the dock of life and land in hell. They've been living in hell before they died. And now there's no backing out of it for them.
I don't think being evil is really satisfying. Which is probably why it accelerates downhill, unless you get a wake up call.
On the other questions I've only knowingly told three lies in my life. One when I was 14, one when I was 36, and I forget the other one. But I am, at the moment, in a rare time of not fully representing the truth so as not to make delicate members in my family too anxious. The full truth will certainly be revealed in time.
That is what I thought 20 years ago. Then I was told off for pointing out, shall we say, "black" research practices by the super stars at the uni I was working at. It is a real shame, as there as some good people in academia and these creatures taint everyone with their fraud.
Reminds me of a professor I had in college whose academic specialty was losing control, binge eating and other compulsive behaviors. One day I friend spotted in frantically binge eating, while attempting to hide behind a tree.
My ex, who went to med school in the 80s, said that all the med students in his class who were choosing psychiatry as their specialty were attempting to figure out themselves.
Good luck to them- as much of this psychology being used by WEF and lie others has been worked on for years by Stanford Harvard and many other University Pyche Dep'ts.
And look at how difficult it has been for many PhD 's in many disciplines to accept the reality of WEF, USA TODAY, PLANdemic Jabs and so much more.
Read about the MORALITY pill that was first floated years ago, and the psychology of those back up statements by Ethic and Psychology trained beings.
A lot of PhDs wake up during the arduous process, I suspect. For example, vaccine uptake increased with more education, right up to PhD, at which point it dropped substantially. I think a lot of them become aware of the flaws and cheats of the academic world in their own field, and then project it onto others (rightfully).
Haha. I was on a weekend getaway and I fooled around with this stunningly beautiful psychologist. Nothing but head games. My head was spinning but not in a good way 🤪
As long as lies, big or small, remain unpunished then lying becomes a way of life. Just look at almost every component of government, media and academia in what was once the USA.
Ken, as Jesus said in the gospel of John speaking of Satan, "He was a murderer from the beginning, and has nothing to do with the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks according to his own nature, for he is a liar and the father of lies. " Indeed, we are witnessing this throughout western society.
There might be a small difference in ethics between me telling my wife her jeans don't make her look fat and the CDC's Walensky saying the covid vaccine provided sterilizing immunity to the virus.
If you like it enough, then buy it. Why the charade? It demeans you if money is more important than integrity.
In 1980 I was in Mombasa, we went to a wood carving "factory"... the people there were carving all sorts of things and there were a couple of things that I quite liked. In those days there were 18 Kenyan shillings to £1, the chap asked for 20 shillings for the rhino he's beautifully carved... I agreed immediately. As we walked away, my wife complained that I should have bartered him down! I was disgusted with her, went back and bought an elephant as well, as much to annoy her as to make the chap's day!
A couple of days later, I played golf on Boxing Day and had a Kenyan boy as a caddie. The intention was to play 18 holes but with soaring temperatures I decided to pack it in after 9 holes. The boy was visibly crestfallen as he thought he's only get paid half. It made my day, and his, when I paid him for the full round anyway.
Complete honesty in all situations would be immoral.
The most common example involves Nazis asking you if you are harboring Jews.
As a general principle, one has no obligation to tell the truth—nor should one, in many cases—in any situation in which someone is trying (coercively or not) to obtain a value from you that he has not earned or does not deserve.
Whether involving one’s property—money, jewels, whatever—that a criminal wants one to reveal or innocent people hiding from criminals, private or State-sponsored, it would be immoral to reveal to a criminal how to rob one of her values.
One example: taxation is theft. As such, lying to hide one’s wealth is not immoral, though one might decide that the negative consequences of lying would not be worth the risk.
But people are so brainwashed by the State, that most people look with disdain upon tax “cheats”…even though they are in no way “cheating” a criminal who seeks to steal their wealth.
Heal up fast,Igor. To quote the brilliant BEMER Microcirculation researcher, physician and physicist, Dr. Rainer Klopp “I hate fake science as much as fake news.” I only got to meet him once in 2018 before he passed away. We need more scientists who never compromise their integrity.
Not shocked at all. Human beings are weak to begin with and now that we reward people for lying what would you expect? I would suggest her success had much to do with her sex and little to do with her academic talents.
didn't mean that. I meant she got it because she was a female vs male. I do not discount the age old technique that the female's have used for eons to get ahead could be used.
I'm sure there are lots of actresses who actually sought out Harvey Weinstein after hearing what he was like. I've noticed that the prettiest never said a bad word about him but had stellar career successes after meeting him.
Same for so many women as well as men in airline careers. Not many truly pretty ones either. They seem to be the only ones that revolt. Sick and tired of being hit on all the time.
When I was an undergraduate, one of my professors, an Austrian Canadian Ashkenazi who had left his last university with glowing references (they were desperate to get rid of him) was gay and students were required to sit for oral examinations with him. I went to my examination wearing my girlfriend's mascara and blue eye shadow. Although it was irrelevant to the course topic his first question "What do you think of homosexuality?" I answered "It's just a perfectly normal thing and an appropriate lifestyle choice." I left unscathed and found later I had received a grade of "Distinction." I was a bit miffed that this would pull down my GPA because usually I got "High Disctinctions." Not long afterwards I encountered him in a hallway. He said "I've been thinking about you. How would you like to come to dinner with me and we can talk about how you could upgrade your "Distinction" to a "High Distinction." I said "Thanks but I can live with a Distinction" and decined. He was the head of the "Ethics Council." He sodomized several of my classmates.
Agreed - she look to me like the "we have to meet the females in area X quota" kind of "talent". Since very few ever admit that they made a mistake hiring a dud, she probably failed upwards as it seems to be the case with Western world.
She should apply for a job with the CDC. She is very qualified.
lmao
This comment wins the Internet for today.
Thank you, DocP
Yes, but people who know how to think like us have strong digestive juices that turn the spike protein into digestible protein.
That job is already taken...by Christine Grady, Chief Bioethicist at the NIH...and Anthony Fauci's wife:
https://thenationalpulse.com/2022/05/18/fauci-wife-authors-paper-supporting-vaccine-pressure-campaigns/
Writing papers about why everyone needs to take dangerous experimental biotech for protection against an illness most everyone, especially under 50, are at no risk of:
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057/s41271-022-00347-9.pdf
But her relationship with the CDC Director who makes millions of dollars from hawking dangerous experimental biotech to everyone, even those at literally zero risk of illness like under 18 is COMPLETELY ethical!:
https://www.elle.com/culture/career-politics/a32715031/fauci-christine-grady-nih-covid/
They're just a happy couple helping Americans and the world, no ethical conflicts of interest, not even the appearance of any ethical conflicts of interest!:
https://youtu.be/pf2cVoP5mRs
Don’t forget the 731 million the NIH has received in kickbacks since 2010. 400 million from Moderna alone in 2022. No conflicts!!!!!!!!
Someone who lives with Tony "La Scienza" must have a deep understanding of ethics.
(in a technical sense, providing the tools to dupe others about it with thick word salad)
Not only lives with Fauci but has written papers with Zeke Emanuel on communitarianism, a political and social philosophy that aims to counter the individualism underlying Western societies by emphasizing a balance between individual and collective goals and values.
In short I think she believes the group outweighs individuals in say a fake pandemic. And we need to act accordingly.
I have seen a podcast with her. Very breezy and smarmy.
Smarm is the worst, fake, and oily, and way too smooth. I hate smarm. It's one of those words that's kind of onomatopoetically revealing if you know what I mean. In other words it even sounds disgusting. ;-)
When you know that the architects of our current health system, like Zeke Emanuel want us all to die at 75 - the end of our "usefulness" to society when our existence costs more than they think we're worth - forcing dangerous experimental biotech into the arms of the nation, world makes a lot more sense, now doesn't it?
https://thefederalist.com/2014/09/23/zeke-emanuel-wants-you-to-die-at-75/
Ironically, if modern "medicine" were not practially forced upon us (especially as we age,) most of us would not cost much at all to keep alive, healthy and contributing to the best of our ability into our 80s, 90s and even beyond. Just look at simpler societies where old folks in their 90s are gardening, going up and down stairs multiple times a day in a home they share with other generations of their family, caring for grandkids or even great-grandchildren while the parents work, etc. They are usually slender and quite agile compared to western society's elderly who are sedentary, arthritic, often warehoused in "care" homes, and loaded with degenerative diseases and all the drugs that are prescribed for those things.
On the other hand, as decrepit drug users, our western elderly could be considered quite valuable to big pharma... as long as there are younger taxpayers to foot the bill when the retirement accounts run dry.
Very well said. When I read docs are jabbing babies on day 1 of life with a Hep B vax in some preemptive strike, it revealed the pure profit motivation to create patients for life by altering the first defense against all diseases, a natural immune system. It's all we ever needed, but we're forced at birth to have it be compromised by pharma and brainwashed docs
Yes. I just discovered t yesterday Health Canada want to remove supplements and make vitamins outrageously expensive. Kill us all with a Nuke….now that would be honest
Also, that group outweighing the individual thing is of course, the root of much evil. And much suffering! Does mankind ever learn? "Oh I know, let's try communism again! This time we'll get it right!"
I don't think so.
Your autocorrect seems to have changed "seared conscience" to "deep understanding of ethics."
No, you're ignoring* my hinting at that intellectually understanding ethics (which is what people become equipped with when studying it academically) does not make people ethical actors themselves. They acquired a toolkit, and will use it according to their inclinations.
* and if it's for purpose of a joke, well it doesn't seem that much of a ripper to me, being based on an immediately apparent false dichotomy, but YMMV.
Much in the same way as Bill Gates display of the book "How to Lie With Statistics."
And your right that my non-ripper of a joke would distract from the actual point. That was not my intention, and I fully agree with your original premise.
Actually, many would agree she's qualified for ALL the Alphabet Agencies infested with Imperial-Feudal Fascist 'Deep State Minions' maneuvering as treasonous lairs...As well as all the Philanthropathic NGO's and 'The Council For Foreign Relations and National Security Council. THERE'S SO MANY INCESTUOUS ORGANIZATIONS BENT UPON FALLACY it's impossible to think of any of honor, integrity, Constitutional Law anywhere in the country.
True, totally, I fought the IRS for 40 years, an extremely corrupt organization, supported by the corrupt court system. You can find my book for free “why no one is required to file tax returns“ on the Internet, showing one of my main points.
And now they’re their own armed force.
Yes, but we need to take away their guns and give them pea shooters with soft peas,.
It’s the ‘we’ part you’re going to have trouble with - likely not enough of them with their own…lead injectors and the will to use them. Meanwhile I’m thinking of dusting off those guillotine blue prints I got in Paris on my last visit… Well, one can dream can’t one?
Maybe we should use one of our back engineered, alien flying saucers to send them to Jupiter
I also have a dream!
Had a little bit of a hard time finding this book bc it’s out of print. But I found it and have perused the table of contents. Looks great! I can’t wait to read it. Thanks for the suggestion.
Excellent, I let it out on the internet at no charge to get the word out.
Definitely need to buy the book...Been wishing more info about the IRS, our Tax System which never passed in enough states to change the Constitution. Hm-m-m? Thank-you!
Yes, he died in prison. I learned a lot from him. He was a real hero.
Thank-you for adding your two cents. Always try to keep comments to a few details...AND AM SO GLAD WHEN OTHERS ADD TO WHAT'S BEEN WROTE.
Helps with those reading for long-term memory.
AND, YOU'RE CORRECT...It's all relevant.
Amen!
Over-qualified.... lol! 😅
Nah, perfectly qualified. I mean, that's what they do there at the CDC, make shale up and act like la de da.
AT THE SAME TIME SHE SHOULD APPLY FOR A **JOB** @<<<C B C >>(CAnadA>
WINNER!
My dad—who was a prolific liar—told me “never trust anyone who tells you how honest they are.” Expert advice.
Always -- 100% -- true.
Any virtue signaling is a bad sign
I'll concede maybe 99% true, definitely not 100%.
Actually, I think the phrase to be wary of is "To be honest..."
That is the biggest signal.
Not really. It's kind of mindlessly blurted out to start a sentence, when someone gives a piece of his opinion, and feels that it's opinion.
In my perception anyway.
I understand. Occasionally it escapes my lips by social influence also. But that they are building to give their opinion, rather than their 'sweet nothing' - that itself is a signal that truth is coming where it may not usually.
My normal response is "What would you say if you weren't being honest then?" before they get to finish the sentence.
One of the most tedious cliches. Whether it be a linguistic deceptor or a sound filler to hide insecurity.
Whenever I hear that opening cliche my immediate response is to say "So you're not usually..../Honesty is not your default..."
I used this most recently to a close family member, who then very surprisingly came back with what was probably the truth, saying she usually 'lies' to keep the peace. She justified it, saying she was in the role as the family's peace maker. I think I would've preferred the truth.
"So you're not usually..../Honesty is not your default..."
That _is_ nice trolling to my taste, though ;)
(w.r.t. how most people, IMO, use it as a filler - not your case here where someone actually felt caught)
I was shocked by 'the truth' - it's not the usual reaction, although perhaps I pushed it a bit harder because I knew her well. Still I didn't expect it, and I wondered if it was the vaccine talking - a little loss of control.
Right up there with
"Let's be clear..."
followed by
(my opinion presented as fact is) X.
Makes me throw up in my mouth a little when I hear it.
Yes! Or "To be clear", always precedes an opinion stated as fact. Especially among covidiots.
That is expression of the covid political moment in Australia - they were all using it - whether by instruction or contagion I don't know.
Maybe the politicians in Australia caught it from him..?
Slightly off topic - same theme; never trust a MSM News outlet if it tells you "Why you can trust the BBC" - link only visible at the very foot of their website "front page" which rather gives the game away for me. I am sure readers here won't stand for the BBC's mendacity and I have personal evidence that their corrupt narrative is far more insidious than is evident in their so called News coverage..
LOL! That is a SURE signal! Any person/body who has a need to provide an explanation of why they/it can be trusted is fully aware that they are not typically, or should not be, trusted. :D
Yes, and anyone who "protests" too much about something others do. I signed a contract with a guy and he went on and on how he hated bullies. A year later he ghosts me with zero work product from him. Then 6 months after that he sues me! My lawyer and his deemed the suit frivolous, but I'm stuck with a $12,000 legal bill!
Red flag for me is when the small contractor or hair stylist says, “I can do anything you want.” Then experience their areas of no knowledge/experience.
I am dealing with at right now during a remodel. Many, many things are being redone.
Usually don’t believe any sentence that starts “in all honesty “
I have a problem with “literally” as well. That’s a red flag for me.
I like to respond to literally with “I thought you meant virtually.”
When people are screaming their heads off about how wonderful they are, run away
Idk. People are multi faceted with sub personalities all living under the same nogin. The phrase may be used by a sub personality to energize an admission they might not usually express. Sometimes it may indicate a desire to set aside a persona or public face and say something that is real but often suppressed. The rest of the time people may use the phrase -- as the community here says -- to mislead. Igor’s description of the vase purchase could suggest a number of different motivations. First, it seems like he loved the vase and was afraid he was transmitting eagerness. So maybe Igor is telling the seller, hey I like this but I won’t pay a crazy price. On the other hand, diminishing the value of something in some cultures is a cue to the other guy to start bargaining. Maybe Igor prized the vase and wanted the seller to wake up and bargain it up a bit, so he did not get it as at a “steal” price! Maybe Igor was struggling with a desire to be more fair with the seller because of his big heart and he was arguing with the another hard nosed sub personality inside. To be sure, Igor has a conscience discussion around this story that is familiar to me. There is a concept in Jungian psychology of the Bright Shadow, which is the existence of a part Self that is positive and good, but hidden (denied) from the Ego and unacceptable to consciousness. Many people are unaware of their tender and loving nature because of early indoctrination. Those feelings are part of a bright shadow. For sure, the story of the Harvard scholars fall is complex and full of unconsciousness. It maybe a requirement of the academy membership in this sad age to be unconscious and narrowly focused. What honesty we have in us is there by the Grace of God.
And it is also a good idea to listen very closely to what these people say. Then you can get a real good idea of what it is. They're going to do and if history is any teacher it's usually not good
But it was advice from a liar?
Try me.
This story reminds me of the following. Who is this "ethics" professor really working for?
---
One young devil asked the old man: "How did you manage to bring so many souls to hell?"
The old devil answered: "I instilled fear in them!"
Answers the youngster: "Great job! And what were they afraid of? Wars? Hunger?"
Answers the man: "No, they were afraid of the disease!"
For this youngster: "Does this mean they didn't get sick? Are they not dead? There was no rescue for them?"
The old man answered: "But no ... they got sick, died, and the rescue was there."
The young devil, surprised, answered: "Then I don't understand?"
The old man answered: "You know they believed the only thing they have to keep at any cost is their lives. They stopped hugging, greeting each other. They've moved away from each other. They gave up all social contacts and everything that was human! Later they ran out of money, lost their jobs, but that was their choice because they were afraid for their lives, that's why they quit their jobs without even having bread.
"They believed blindly everything they heard and read in the papers. They gave up their freedoms, they didn't leave their own homes literally anywhere. They stopped visiting family and friends. The world turned into such a concentration camp, without forcing them into captivity. They accepted everything! Just to live at least one more miserable day ... And so living, they died every day! And that's how it was very easy for me to take their miserable souls to hell ..." --Author in Dispute
Funny about that. They were afraid of dying but not sufficiently afraid of hell.
They were already living in hell, going to the next level was the obvious move.
True. Years ago I realized evil people don't just step off the dock of life and land in hell. They've been living in hell before they died. And now there's no backing out of it for them.
I don't think being evil is really satisfying. Which is probably why it accelerates downhill, unless you get a wake up call.
Describes much of humanity over all time!
Irrespective of the varied human prevalence of dissembling, there is zero room for dishonesty in academic papers. Zero. Zero tolerance. Out!
On the other questions I've only knowingly told three lies in my life. One when I was 14, one when I was 36, and I forget the other one. But I am, at the moment, in a rare time of not fully representing the truth so as not to make delicate members in my family too anxious. The full truth will certainly be revealed in time.
That is what I thought 20 years ago. Then I was told off for pointing out, shall we say, "black" research practices by the super stars at the uni I was working at. It is a real shame, as there as some good people in academia and these creatures taint everyone with their fraud.
A good, true story. Hope you feel better soon, Igor. We need to nail these people.
I recall as a little girl my dad sold the house next door on a handshake. That sure cuts out all the
bankers, insurance companies and others. It worked out well.
This is one of the main reasons why I’m such a fan of The Andy Griffith Show. Main reason why so many others are as well.
Reminds me of a professor I had in college whose academic specialty was losing control, binge eating and other compulsive behaviors. One day I friend spotted in frantically binge eating, while attempting to hide behind a tree.
Many people choose to study psychology in order to attempt to understand their own problems.
Source: ex-gf psychology student told me.
My mother said the same thing about psychologists.
My ex, who went to med school in the 80s, said that all the med students in his class who were choosing psychiatry as their specialty were attempting to figure out themselves.
That's why I decided against studying psychology. Everyone I knew who was in the classes had serious issues. I was 16 but saw it even then.
I believe that is why so many college kids are psych majors right now.
Good luck to them- as much of this psychology being used by WEF and lie others has been worked on for years by Stanford Harvard and many other University Pyche Dep'ts.
And look at how difficult it has been for many PhD 's in many disciplines to accept the reality of WEF, USA TODAY, PLANdemic Jabs and so much more.
Read about the MORALITY pill that was first floated years ago, and the psychology of those back up statements by Ethic and Psychology trained beings.
I was somewhat keen for a daughter to do some psychology subjects so she could wake up more to the arts being pressed upon her.
Very good points. Bad enough that they’re brainwashing the young kids but then the continued brainwashing through to PhD. Scary.
A lot of PhDs wake up during the arduous process, I suspect. For example, vaccine uptake increased with more education, right up to PhD, at which point it dropped substantially. I think a lot of them become aware of the flaws and cheats of the academic world in their own field, and then project it onto others (rightfully).
Haha. I was on a weekend getaway and I fooled around with this stunningly beautiful psychologist. Nothing but head games. My head was spinning but not in a good way 🤪
Ha! Don’t even get me started on most social workers. I have found only one good one,
LOL, same here, bro, same here.
That’s where a passion and interest can develop from a desire to fix themselves.
They project.
Virtue signallers, scolds and ninny-nagging nannies all project.
As long as lies, big or small, remain unpunished then lying becomes a way of life. Just look at almost every component of government, media and academia in what was once the USA.
The Ulcered Sphincter of Arserica... courtesy of Lewis Prothero in V for Vendetta.
Ken, as Jesus said in the gospel of John speaking of Satan, "He was a murderer from the beginning, and has nothing to do with the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks according to his own nature, for he is a liar and the father of lies. " Indeed, we are witnessing this throughout western society.
So, with the Leftist revolving door dropping Lightfoot at Harvard, does this mean Francesca gets to be mayor of Chicago?
Lightfoot was dropped?
Good.
Although it doesn't reflect well she was hired in the first place. When I heard that on the radio I l laughed so hard the car next to me heard it.
I think he was talking about a swap. Beetle juice ain’t going nowhere
Probably, maybe president.
There might be a small difference in ethics between me telling my wife her jeans don't make her look fat and the CDC's Walensky saying the covid vaccine provided sterilizing immunity to the virus.
My fave online comment of the day!
A great movie to watch The Invention of Lying
Just pay for the vase cheapskate!!
If you like it enough, then buy it. Why the charade? It demeans you if money is more important than integrity.
In 1980 I was in Mombasa, we went to a wood carving "factory"... the people there were carving all sorts of things and there were a couple of things that I quite liked. In those days there were 18 Kenyan shillings to £1, the chap asked for 20 shillings for the rhino he's beautifully carved... I agreed immediately. As we walked away, my wife complained that I should have bartered him down! I was disgusted with her, went back and bought an elephant as well, as much to annoy her as to make the chap's day!
A couple of days later, I played golf on Boxing Day and had a Kenyan boy as a caddie. The intention was to play 18 holes but with soaring temperatures I decided to pack it in after 9 holes. The boy was visibly crestfallen as he thought he's only get paid half. It made my day, and his, when I paid him for the full round anyway.
My wife would be a perfect shopping partner for Igor. My transparency drives her insane
Hoping you feel better fast...Thanks for posting in spite of not feeling up to par!
'Are you surprised that a Harvard “ethics researcher” is academically dishonest?' No.
'Is there a difference between “small lies” and “big lies”?' Yes.
'Do you know anyone who is always completely honest?' No.
Falsifying data for academic research is definitely a big lie. No matter the subject area.
Complete honesty in all situations would be immoral.
The most common example involves Nazis asking you if you are harboring Jews.
As a general principle, one has no obligation to tell the truth—nor should one, in many cases—in any situation in which someone is trying (coercively or not) to obtain a value from you that he has not earned or does not deserve.
Whether involving one’s property—money, jewels, whatever—that a criminal wants one to reveal or innocent people hiding from criminals, private or State-sponsored, it would be immoral to reveal to a criminal how to rob one of her values.
One example: taxation is theft. As such, lying to hide one’s wealth is not immoral, though one might decide that the negative consequences of lying would not be worth the risk.
But people are so brainwashed by the State, that most people look with disdain upon tax “cheats”…even though they are in no way “cheating” a criminal who seeks to steal their wealth.
Sad.
Heal up fast,Igor. To quote the brilliant BEMER Microcirculation researcher, physician and physicist, Dr. Rainer Klopp “I hate fake science as much as fake news.” I only got to meet him once in 2018 before he passed away. We need more scientists who never compromise their integrity.
Thank you!
Not shocked at all. Human beings are weak to begin with and now that we reward people for lying what would you expect? I would suggest her success had much to do with her sex and little to do with her academic talents.
Yep. Who was she sleeping with? Would be interesting to get to the bottom of that.
and we need video proof
didn't mean that. I meant she got it because she was a female vs male. I do not discount the age old technique that the female's have used for eons to get ahead could be used.
And academic departments are especially ripe for that behavior.
Except in this woke academic culture how would one know who to come on to? Women to other women? trans M to trans F? Does it even matter?
She may have been a diversity selection. Especially if she used to be male.
Ya just know. But you're right about the trans angle, never thought of that.
I'm sure there are lots of actresses who actually sought out Harvey Weinstein after hearing what he was like. I've noticed that the prettiest never said a bad word about him but had stellar career successes after meeting him.
Same for so many women as well as men in airline careers. Not many truly pretty ones either. They seem to be the only ones that revolt. Sick and tired of being hit on all the time.
Or of *not* being hit on, lol.
Absolutely 100%
I could never stand for anything #MeToo. It was crazy. It was the trial run fo COVID insanity.
Because there are so many more successful women than successful men? Hmm...Since there aren't, I suggest you may want to refine that theory...
When I was an undergraduate, one of my professors, an Austrian Canadian Ashkenazi who had left his last university with glowing references (they were desperate to get rid of him) was gay and students were required to sit for oral examinations with him. I went to my examination wearing my girlfriend's mascara and blue eye shadow. Although it was irrelevant to the course topic his first question "What do you think of homosexuality?" I answered "It's just a perfectly normal thing and an appropriate lifestyle choice." I left unscathed and found later I had received a grade of "Distinction." I was a bit miffed that this would pull down my GPA because usually I got "High Disctinctions." Not long afterwards I encountered him in a hallway. He said "I've been thinking about you. How would you like to come to dinner with me and we can talk about how you could upgrade your "Distinction" to a "High Distinction." I said "Thanks but I can live with a Distinction" and decined. He was the head of the "Ethics Council." He sodomized several of my classmates.
Not surprising. Though, did you deliberately wear the mascara and blue eye shadow to gain advantage?
That entire revelation made my head spin. What decade was this? Was this an American or Canadian university?
Are you putting us on?
It’s been used for eons do not discount it. The VP is there because of it.
C"mon man! She is the second smartest person Joe knows!
Eeewww!
Never realized that you are an equestrian.
I think she went to that girl's school in "Animal House".
So to speak....!
Agreed - she look to me like the "we have to meet the females in area X quota" kind of "talent". Since very few ever admit that they made a mistake hiring a dud, she probably failed upwards as it seems to be the case with Western world.