I can still admit a faint possibility that it was not an intentional release. But "unintentional release" requires extreme contortions of facts to be believable.
I can still admit a faint possibility that it was not an intentional release. But "unintentional release" requires extreme contortions of facts to be believable.
Absent this smoking gun, I would disagree. The longstanding intentional release hypothesis has been what I call the "bioweapon hypothesis." That never really held up under scrutiny because it makes zero strategic sense for China to release the virus internally, lock themselves down and derail their own economy, just to create a pandemic. As a bioweapon, it was released in the wrong city.
However, a Moderna patented gene not only proves lab creation but paints a plausible intentional release scenario: to create a market for Moderna's "vaccine" (they basically used the script from Mission: Impossible 2 for the strategy template).
The Big Pharma hypothesis has also been lingering in the "conspiracy theory" fringe, and this study gives that hypothesis a triple dose of credibility.
It's like 9/11. The short sellers who made a lot of money were no doubt assisted by insiders, who undoubtedly took their cut, but that was only a subsidiary part of the enterprise. The real agenda was elsewhere.
So, here. The real point was the desperation that ruling circles in the West increasingly felt that China was taking their place. Something had to be done. The world had to be shaken up. Otherwise, it was certain that they would lose. A Great Reset would also preserve them from losing power in the West. Some ill-gotten financial gains would of course be welcome. But that was secondary.
Dr. David Martin has described this whole tawdry tale in detail in several videos. How Fauci and his minions, starting in the 1990s, applied for and got over four thousand patents relating to the development of the SARS-cov2 virus. Maybe he isn’t thought to be credible, but the patents exist.
I can still admit a faint possibility that it was not an intentional release. But "unintentional release" requires extreme contortions of facts to be believable.
Absent this smoking gun, I would disagree. The longstanding intentional release hypothesis has been what I call the "bioweapon hypothesis." That never really held up under scrutiny because it makes zero strategic sense for China to release the virus internally, lock themselves down and derail their own economy, just to create a pandemic. As a bioweapon, it was released in the wrong city.
However, a Moderna patented gene not only proves lab creation but paints a plausible intentional release scenario: to create a market for Moderna's "vaccine" (they basically used the script from Mission: Impossible 2 for the strategy template).
The Big Pharma hypothesis has also been lingering in the "conspiracy theory" fringe, and this study gives that hypothesis a triple dose of credibility.
A lot of facts agree with this, yes, and we need to dig deeply, but it does not mean that it is true for sure
It's like 9/11. The short sellers who made a lot of money were no doubt assisted by insiders, who undoubtedly took their cut, but that was only a subsidiary part of the enterprise. The real agenda was elsewhere.
So, here. The real point was the desperation that ruling circles in the West increasingly felt that China was taking their place. Something had to be done. The world had to be shaken up. Otherwise, it was certain that they would lose. A Great Reset would also preserve them from losing power in the West. Some ill-gotten financial gains would of course be welcome. But that was secondary.
Dr. David Martin has described this whole tawdry tale in detail in several videos. How Fauci and his minions, starting in the 1990s, applied for and got over four thousand patents relating to the development of the SARS-cov2 virus. Maybe he isn’t thought to be credible, but the patents exist.