12 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Troll Hunter's avatar

Yep. For "conspiracy" FACTS, get up to speed here: https://www geoengineeringwatch.org

Expand full comment
Bird's avatar

And remember that barium and aluminum are Toxic to trees.

We have less than 1% of our redwood forests remaining, and look at California's skies in these satellite pictures. They have been sampling tree bark and finding aluminum and barium, which is not natural. Meanwhile Yosemite lost 25% of its giants -- toppling over! -- in one season alone last year. 25% of these ancient sacred trees in a few months.

How smart is Gates paying to spray micro metals into the atmosphere? And what gives him the right to take the life of even one giant tree who has been living here for centuries? What gives any rich person the right to poison vast expanses of soil, trees, and anything in between based on their own misconception of thinking they are clever, when really understanding so little?

Expand full comment
Lisa@eatrealfood's avatar

I heard from a podcaster that the temperature of the fires where aluminum oxide has been sprayed is so much hotter because of reacting with the iron. I assume iron is in plants, therefore plants can't regrow in those burn areas. I still need to research the chemisry of this claim.

.

Expand full comment
Bird's avatar

Yes, the firefighters in California are reporting that fires are burning explosively, completely out of control, like nothing that was ever seen before.

Expand full comment
Positively Paying It Forward's avatar

I’m sure the “experts “ are baffled.

Expand full comment
Trash Panda's avatar

And check out the videos of the fire tornado's. First time many folks had ever seen that

Expand full comment
TexasRed's avatar

I have pondered this myself. If you or I dumped literal tons of aluminum and barium particulate from a plane, we’d be in prison on felony pollution charges. Dress it all up in “climate science” jargon though, and the global elite can do it thousands of times, over many years, all over the world with impunity. And they do not care that we might object to having our water, air, soil, and bodies contaminated. If I ever discover what patch of planet Earth they AREN’T spraying over (no doubt they need a preserve for themselves), I might consider moving there. Except then I’d have psychopaths for neighbors.

Expand full comment
Bird's avatar

Which stage of Piaget's child development would that fall under...... If I spray 78 tons of aluminum and barium into the air .......

(a) it magically disappears and doesn't exist anymore

(b) it continues to exist, in a different location, even if I don't see it

Oh, right. Object Permanence. Age 18 to 24 months.

When Gates and all of these bull-in-a-china-shop scientists mature to the 18-month stage, maybe they can consider some implications of their grandiose ideas.

Expand full comment
TexasRed's avatar

Consider this: fluoride is an industrial waste product that was expensive to expose of safely and properly in order to not incur pollution penalties. But send it into a lab to test it for any potentially useful properties, and — presto! — this former liability is magically transformed into a profit-generating, marketable substance. Sure it still has its drawbacks, but that’s no obstacle to a decent marketing and PR team. Merely convince the public of its benefits, quietly squelch any mention of its harms, and pretty soon this nasty byproduct is not only widely accepted — governments will spend a fortune in tax dollars to acquire it and add it to the municipal water supply (a decision I don’t recall getting to vote on).

Let’s see… what other nasty industrial waste byproducts do we have taking up space and costing too much to bury in lined underground storage? Perhaps these, too, can be “lucratively repurposed”?

See how this works?

Just speculating.

Expand full comment
Bird's avatar

And things snowball.

We are currently at the point where US medical guidelines train doctors to recommend oral fluoride supplementation to infants who have the 'risk factor' of living in an area that does not have fluoridated water, so that these babies will not suffer "fluoride deficiency." They are actually using that term now: "fluoride deficiency." Nevermind that fluoride is a neurotoxin. This is literally what the materials given to doctors say - sponsored by a large shadowy company in Bethesda.

Expand full comment
TexasRed's avatar

And the public exclaims in unison, “They wouldn’t do that if it were harmful!” SMH

I take great comfort knowing that God sees all this, and that the reckoning is coming. Until then, we hold the line (with His help, of course).

Expand full comment
Veronica Evans's avatar

Interesting to consider that the CA Redwoods were in existence during the time of the Christ. As a satanist/Luciferian, Gates knows this. Why wouldn’t he seek to destroy something that’s 2,000 years old which by its very age harkens back to an extraordinary Life & Consciousness which walked on the earth. How can anyone not think of GOD or the magnificence of Nature when they see the stature & height of the Redwoods.

What’s being intentionally done to these trees is meant to hurt Mankind for who wouldn’t feel deeply distressed over their destruction in light of their thriving for two centuries agst. all odds.

Expand full comment