Thanks for link. Unfortunately that paper is problematic because it refers to the alleged 'virus' called 'SARS COV2' when no such virus has ever been shown to exist. In fact virology as a field of study does not meet the basic criteria of science (ie hypothesis driven and using adequate controls in order to be falsifiable).
Also 'covid' itself has no distinguishing clinical symptoms which means it cannot be called a new disease. Covid symptoms range from no symptoms (asymptomatic).... to the flu .... to dying of multi organ failure ..... and everything else in between. It is a meaningless term.
Ex-virologist Dr Stefan Lanka has demonstrated how the standard virological experiments (cytopathic effect of a cell culture) will provide 'proof' of the supposed 'virus' SARS COV2 even when no sample from a sick person is added. He has also managed to extract the entire SARS COV2 genome from a sample of yeast, again without adding any sample from a sick person. These experiments are the controls that virologists never do.... presumably because they expose virology as pseudo-science.
In other words, virology's own methodology will always provide proof of a 'virus', making the entire field of virology a fraud and everything downstream from virology (tests, vaccines, lockdowns, masks and social distancing) also a fraud.
Over 200 health and environmental agencies have responded to FOIA requests with the admission that they hold no evidence of SARS COV2 being isolated from any sick person. The so called 'virus' is no more than an imaginary computer generated 'in silico' mental construct which has never been proven to exist in nature.
The only part of that paper which adheres to science is the stuff about the harms caused by microwaves. But the stuff about viruses is just nonsense. Microwaves are a real thing, viruses are not.
This is good news. Once virology is rejected as a pseudo-science we can all focus on the REAL threats to our health such as vaccines, wireless pollution, poor diet, pesticides, chemtrails, processed foods, pharma drugs and emotional trauma from watching too much 'fear porn' on TV etc :)
The problems with virology are explained in this paper.
Very useful article, thank you, even taking into account new health paradigm's reservation. It would be a good study to give to a sympathetic doctor willing to open their mind.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8580522/
Thanks for link. Unfortunately that paper is problematic because it refers to the alleged 'virus' called 'SARS COV2' when no such virus has ever been shown to exist. In fact virology as a field of study does not meet the basic criteria of science (ie hypothesis driven and using adequate controls in order to be falsifiable).
Also 'covid' itself has no distinguishing clinical symptoms which means it cannot be called a new disease. Covid symptoms range from no symptoms (asymptomatic).... to the flu .... to dying of multi organ failure ..... and everything else in between. It is a meaningless term.
Ex-virologist Dr Stefan Lanka has demonstrated how the standard virological experiments (cytopathic effect of a cell culture) will provide 'proof' of the supposed 'virus' SARS COV2 even when no sample from a sick person is added. He has also managed to extract the entire SARS COV2 genome from a sample of yeast, again without adding any sample from a sick person. These experiments are the controls that virologists never do.... presumably because they expose virology as pseudo-science.
In other words, virology's own methodology will always provide proof of a 'virus', making the entire field of virology a fraud and everything downstream from virology (tests, vaccines, lockdowns, masks and social distancing) also a fraud.
Over 200 health and environmental agencies have responded to FOIA requests with the admission that they hold no evidence of SARS COV2 being isolated from any sick person. The so called 'virus' is no more than an imaginary computer generated 'in silico' mental construct which has never been proven to exist in nature.
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/
The only part of that paper which adheres to science is the stuff about the harms caused by microwaves. But the stuff about viruses is just nonsense. Microwaves are a real thing, viruses are not.
This is good news. Once virology is rejected as a pseudo-science we can all focus on the REAL threats to our health such as vaccines, wireless pollution, poor diet, pesticides, chemtrails, processed foods, pharma drugs and emotional trauma from watching too much 'fear porn' on TV etc :)
The problems with virology are explained in this paper.
https://drsambailey.com/a-farewell-to-virology-expert-edition/
Virologists have been invited to prove their methods on a set of blinded samples (so far they have refused the challenge).
https://drsambailey.com/resources/settling-the-virus-debate/
(edited: typo)
Very useful article, thank you, even taking into account new health paradigm's reservation. It would be a good study to give to a sympathetic doctor willing to open their mind.