Cole's evidence appears to be anecdotal; but on blogs everywhere, many people provide stories about "aggressive" or "sudden" cancers in family/friends. What about looking at mortality data?
Cole's evidence appears to be anecdotal; but on blogs everywhere, many people provide stories about "aggressive" or "sudden" cancers in family/friends. What about looking at mortality data?
A doctor made a comment earlier in the comments that might answer this. I'll paste it here to save you the search:
"gor, I’m very impressed with your work as a layman. I’m a medical doctor with a biochemistry degree and you’re very close to being on the money in your write-up.
One thing I will clarify for you though, is that from the descriptions of the MSH3 gene, it appears to be a mismatch repair (MMR) mechanism protein - when these are mutated, they usually become non-functional, failing to do their job, and thus allowing cancer to start when mutations happen that aren’t repaired. This is also known as a “tumor suppressor gene”. You generally need to knock out both copies of this gene in a human cell (we have two copies of every gene) in order to cause cancer. Transfecting this mutant gene into humans via the covid vaccine would not likely cause cancer by itself, as your cells will still produce their own effective MMR proteins.
This does NOT mean that the vaccine won’t cause cancer: as you’ve mentioned elsewhere, the spike protein itself is blocking our own natural MMR mechanisms… this is very dangerous. If this happened very briefly and then the mRNA was destroyed, it would likely have little effect on our cancer risk - I’m not sure to what degree. BUT, if it is reverse-copying itself into our genome and producing an endless supply of spike protein that blocks MMR… then you will very likely get cancer, everywhere in your body, with enough time."
Using Poly:I/C turns down TLR expression, as well. So even if the shots didn't contain an antigen AT ALL, there's likely an increased risk of cancer after injection.
His may be an anecdote, but it's hard scientific fact that injecting RNA with pseudo-Uridine (Poly:I/C, a fake codon building block of synthetic RNA) down-regulates toll-like receptors necessary for keeping cancerous cells and dormant viruses in check throughout our lives.
Cole's evidence appears to be anecdotal; but on blogs everywhere, many people provide stories about "aggressive" or "sudden" cancers in family/friends. What about looking at mortality data?
https://vaccinesafety.info/2021/08/26/dr-ryan-cole-stopthemandate/
You see, I wanted to see some independent confirmation of cancers. So far I have not found it.
Do I trust Ryan Cole? In some sense yes. But when I hear an extraordinary claim I need a great level of confirmation.
A doctor made a comment earlier in the comments that might answer this. I'll paste it here to save you the search:
"gor, I’m very impressed with your work as a layman. I’m a medical doctor with a biochemistry degree and you’re very close to being on the money in your write-up.
One thing I will clarify for you though, is that from the descriptions of the MSH3 gene, it appears to be a mismatch repair (MMR) mechanism protein - when these are mutated, they usually become non-functional, failing to do their job, and thus allowing cancer to start when mutations happen that aren’t repaired. This is also known as a “tumor suppressor gene”. You generally need to knock out both copies of this gene in a human cell (we have two copies of every gene) in order to cause cancer. Transfecting this mutant gene into humans via the covid vaccine would not likely cause cancer by itself, as your cells will still produce their own effective MMR proteins.
This does NOT mean that the vaccine won’t cause cancer: as you’ve mentioned elsewhere, the spike protein itself is blocking our own natural MMR mechanisms… this is very dangerous. If this happened very briefly and then the mRNA was destroyed, it would likely have little effect on our cancer risk - I’m not sure to what degree. BUT, if it is reverse-copying itself into our genome and producing an endless supply of spike protein that blocks MMR… then you will very likely get cancer, everywhere in your body, with enough time."
Using Poly:I/C turns down TLR expression, as well. So even if the shots didn't contain an antigen AT ALL, there's likely an increased risk of cancer after injection.
His may be an anecdote, but it's hard scientific fact that injecting RNA with pseudo-Uridine (Poly:I/C, a fake codon building block of synthetic RNA) down-regulates toll-like receptors necessary for keeping cancerous cells and dormant viruses in check throughout our lives.