484 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Boostershots's avatar

Igor! You're doin' it again!

This is just another unscientific meaningless mouse torture study! (That's our humble opinion).

But I'm sure we can both agree on these simple FACTS:

"The experiments were not randomized, and investigators were not blinded to allocation during experiments and outcome assessment."

Talk about "CYA language"! This study 100% bunk just from this one sentence alone! (And I thought you were a "hard math guy"...whatever).

There were ZERO controls again! ZERO!

People: 180 test subjects TOTAL

60 with pre-diabetes mellitus AND vaxxed

60 with diabetes mellitus AND vaxxed

60 with NO diabetes AND vaxxed.

ZERO CONTROL SUBJECTS

ZERO with pre-diabetes mellitus AND UNVACCINATED

ZERO with diabetes mellitus AND UNVACCINATED

ZERO with NO diabetes AND UNVACCINATED

Mice: UNKNOWN number of test subjects total.

ALL of them were injected with BioNTech unicorn juice 5 times, (once a week for 5 weeks).

ZERO Mice that didnt' have BioNTech unicorn juice! You know, like unvaxxed? Just like you and me bro...

How do we know the experiment itself isn't causing whatever they're claiming?

Igor! Our last article was a big hit! We're doing a sequel! (We're thinking about a Robocop 2 theme). So are you gonna party this time are are you going to be a pouty face again?

Love you bro. -Booboo

Expand full comment
Vintage's avatar

They lost me at :

“ ‘About 61.1% of diabetic subjects’ had impairment of insulin sensitivity according to the HOMA-IR index and about 66.7% of diabetic subjects had increased risks of cardiovascular complications according to…”

First word: About.

Seriously?

Expand full comment
Vintage's avatar

Please note:

“About 66.7” is 66.6, or 666, coincidence?

Relevant?

You decide.

Expand full comment