It's interesting you bring that up. I hear them a lot on the McCullough report and while I love the doc, I think the advertising for Nattokinese is over the rails by rightout claiming that it removes the spike protein and that it is a PROVEN method. Even Dr Mccullough is cautious in making such claims, he rather says that they had positive results so far in his practice, but in a Q&A he also answered that currently there is no proven method of removing spike protein alltogether.
The Wellness Company is not to be mistaken for the doctors who want to help their patients and clinging to any hope of products claiming to help.
You mean, what the market will bear, right? If the products are seen as overpriced they won’t sell. Dr McCullough has been working like a slave for 4 years trying to educate the public, has risked everything, so if his enterprise makes him a profit then it is well deserved. He EARNED IT. If consumers see the products as overpriced , the products won’t sell. It’s as simple as that. Also, competitors may enter the realm and drive prices down. It’s called capitalism.
My issue is not their pricing, but the way they claim that the products are proven methods that solve problems. No disclaimer. Even Dr Mccullough is cautious and says that they had positive results so far with Nattokinese, but he also said that there is currently no proven method of removing spike protein altogether. Not sure whether it was a Mccullough report where he said that, more likely in a Q&A with Malcolm in America Out Loud Pulse.
I looked it up, it's indeed America Out Loud Pulse Q&A 98.
First few minutes. Did not sound to me like Dr Mccullough claiming there are any wonder drugs out there,but he says these solutions "help".
This is the issue with the advertising model: in their case it's not "brought to you by Pfizer", but "brought to you by the Wellness Company". Do we really believe there is much difference?
When your advertiser is a pharma company, you will not say that their products are nothing more than wishful thinking.
Also, from 38:35 in the Q&A the doc is quite clear regarding the effects on mRNA, that there is no method they know of that destroys it. Mind you, this is not the same as the spike protein itself, but any current drugs claiming to be a one-shop solution are not giving informed consent if they omit the fact that as long as the mRNA stays in the body, spike protein production is a given.
The way I see it, if there's a fire by a volcano, you will not solve the problem by extinguishing the fire only, because the volcano will always be there.
As soon as money is to be made, we should always take their words with a grain of salt.
I urge caution in ALL matters these days. We are, after all, talking about ingesting a substance(s) into the human body to counter effects from the jab. Urging caution and doing due diligence does not imply "wrong" but after these past few years I question EVERYTHING!
What is wrong with the Wellness Company??
I do not like the manner in which they promote their supplements
It's interesting you bring that up. I hear them a lot on the McCullough report and while I love the doc, I think the advertising for Nattokinese is over the rails by rightout claiming that it removes the spike protein and that it is a PROVEN method. Even Dr Mccullough is cautious in making such claims, he rather says that they had positive results so far in his practice, but in a Q&A he also answered that currently there is no proven method of removing spike protein alltogether.
The Wellness Company is not to be mistaken for the doctors who want to help their patients and clinging to any hope of products claiming to help.
What "manner" do you not like in which they promote their supplements?
It’s bullshit like you and him. Charlatans all!
Be more specific please
Yeah, the rap I read was the profit center was enormous on all there products, like 40×.
You mean, what the market will bear, right? If the products are seen as overpriced they won’t sell. Dr McCullough has been working like a slave for 4 years trying to educate the public, has risked everything, so if his enterprise makes him a profit then it is well deserved. He EARNED IT. If consumers see the products as overpriced , the products won’t sell. It’s as simple as that. Also, competitors may enter the realm and drive prices down. It’s called capitalism.
Not true. He’s a fucking self-serving agitprop walking conflict of interest and you are his cocksleeve.
My issue is not their pricing, but the way they claim that the products are proven methods that solve problems. No disclaimer. Even Dr Mccullough is cautious and says that they had positive results so far with Nattokinese, but he also said that there is currently no proven method of removing spike protein altogether. Not sure whether it was a Mccullough report where he said that, more likely in a Q&A with Malcolm in America Out Loud Pulse.
I looked it up, it's indeed America Out Loud Pulse Q&A 98.
First few minutes. Did not sound to me like Dr Mccullough claiming there are any wonder drugs out there,but he says these solutions "help".
This is the issue with the advertising model: in their case it's not "brought to you by Pfizer", but "brought to you by the Wellness Company". Do we really believe there is much difference?
When your advertiser is a pharma company, you will not say that their products are nothing more than wishful thinking.
Also, from 38:35 in the Q&A the doc is quite clear regarding the effects on mRNA, that there is no method they know of that destroys it. Mind you, this is not the same as the spike protein itself, but any current drugs claiming to be a one-shop solution are not giving informed consent if they omit the fact that as long as the mRNA stays in the body, spike protein production is a given.
The way I see it, if there's a fire by a volcano, you will not solve the problem by extinguishing the fire only, because the volcano will always be there.
As soon as money is to be made, we should always take their words with a grain of salt.
Agree, but having $3.49 in ingredients, & selling for $49.99 is a bit much. Purchase those 3 cheap ingredient separately & save a lot of $'s.
Agreed. But then again they advertise the ingredients and have no problem with people sourcing their own.
I'm not sure what to think. It's a grey area for me.
I urge caution in ALL matters these days. We are, after all, talking about ingesting a substance(s) into the human body to counter effects from the jab. Urging caution and doing due diligence does not imply "wrong" but after these past few years I question EVERYTHING!