My friend was coerced to take novavax and nearly died a few days later and has been sick ever since with heart issues and autoimmune issues. She was previously completely healthy.
Ugh, Novavax. I was all about that one until i found out the sordid history of corona virus vaccine development even sans mRNA and I said no way in HELL.
Interestingly, I would have taken Novavax and enjoyed some potentially life threatening symptoms had the elites not delayed it for so long in order to secure test subjects for the mRNA sludge. That delay gave me time to expand my research beyond mRNA.
And the funny thing was that I was STILL attacked as a "dangerous antivaxxer" while being an avid and very vocal supporter of Novavax! Generally by people who had no idea how each type of jab even worked, because there is no judgmental ass like one who hasn't bothered to do any reading on the subject.
Please Tell your friend to go to the FLCCC.org website, look for their iRecover protocol, start reading. Or, she can also go to the Wellness Company website, TWC, and read their offerings. Both offer telemedicine options, work with "long covid and vaxx injuries, and I am not their sales rep. Only wondering why no one else has suggested this earlier, eh?
I purchased an emergency kit for myself and my husband in the early fall. They came in handy when we both caught "covid" for the first time in early November. Neither of us took the jab.
The emergency kit contains a few different antibiotics, an anti-fungal, ivermectin, and an anti-nausea medication. They are dispensed from participating pharmacies. TWC has different kit specifically for covid. Most doctors will not prescribe any of these medications for covid. And my doctor is still out on leave 'cause covid. I don't know if she's injured or scared.
I've also taken TWC spike support (along with bromelain and the curcumin I'd been taking for the past two years for a frozen shoulder). I developed two different autoimmune diseases shortly after my first flu years ago. I didn't want a repeat. If these naturally occurring substances can clear the viral proteins from my body quickly, I'm all for it.
While I agree that we should all be cautious about anyone and everyone, I'm really struggling to understand the attack on McCullough and TWC. They're providing a service that few others can or will. Jeff Bezos sucks, but people still use Amazon and shop at Whole Foods. Bill Gates is a demon, but people still use Microsoft. Unless you think they're poisoning people?
"Today, ivermectin is continuing to surprise and excite scientists, offering more and more promise to help improve global public health by treating a diverse range of diseases, with its unexpected potential as an antibacterial, antiviral and anti-cancer agent being particularly extraordinary."
I'm sure you'll convince many people with your winning personality, Hudson. I'm feeling generous today, so I bestow my experimental gene transfection jabs to you. What are we up to now? Seven? 'Cause the jabs works soooooo well. Obviously.
It does. You are 14 times less likely to end up in the emergency room or dead if you have had the vaccination and 9 to 12 month boosters. It’s not fucking simple. If you simply extrapolate the numbers pre-vaccine it has saved a quarter billion lives minimum planet wide it’s caused 50,000 direct deaths in over 19 billion injections. Over 98% of all post injection trauma was a sore injection site. As an a short sore shoulder. You just making ridiculous claims pretty much confirms my point. You got nothing but fucking stupid claims and ad hominem bullshit. You have no credible evidence whatsoever. you’re just talking out the side of your face with your head up your ass.
Really? had not heard anything except Dr Mike Yeadon saying they are using fear of flu the next pandemic to sell their kits. Not passing judgement, simply cannot obtain many of their offerings in US drugstores without a script and most standard doctors do not acknowledge injury and will not prescribe.
It's interesting you bring that up. I hear them a lot on the McCullough report and while I love the doc, I think the advertising for Nattokinese is over the rails by rightout claiming that it removes the spike protein and that it is a PROVEN method. Even Dr Mccullough is cautious in making such claims, he rather says that they had positive results so far in his practice, but in a Q&A he also answered that currently there is no proven method of removing spike protein alltogether.
The Wellness Company is not to be mistaken for the doctors who want to help their patients and clinging to any hope of products claiming to help.
I urge caution in ALL matters these days. We are, after all, talking about ingesting a substance(s) into the human body to counter effects from the jab. Urging caution and doing due diligence does not imply "wrong" but after these past few years I question EVERYTHING!
Nattokinase is actually derived from a fermented soy food long traditional in Japan. Pre-pandemic, it was recommended as a blood pressure regulator, as it acts both as an anticoagulant and vasodilator. Apparently, recent findings show it also blocks the action of the spike protein from locking into the cell’s ACE receptor.
Yes, the spike protein is toxic and can provoke autoimmune responses which includes heart issues. The mRNA delivery just adds additional potential adverse responses as well as long term exposure to the spike protein.
Proteins can be dangerous on many levels. Most animal/seafood allergies occur because the immune system recognizes proteins in the exoskeleton of shellfish or animal excretions as toxic.
Cat allergies for example have nothing to do with fur and everything to do with cat’s obsession with licking itself thus depositing protein laden saliva onto its body which then sloughs off on dander that floats microscopically in the air.
Once inhaled the afflicted’s immune system goes into overdrive sometimes resulting in anaphylactic shock. Every physician knows this.
So when I explained to my doctor that my propensity towards overreaction to proteins is why I avoided the shot, he claimed he was impressed that I made what he referred to as a rational decision and immediately took it off my chart and stopped pestering me about taking it.
The fact he didn't immediately argue/mock/disrespect/metaphorically spit on you for not just lying there like meat on a plate and never using your own brain to make your own medical choices puts him head and shoulders above a lot of docs I've heard about.
I had a doc I liked a lot. He quit and moved. I’m in generally good health for a 67 year old and get a yearly physical.
I called the office and asked to see the guy I see now. No can do, said the gatekeepers. Not taking new patients. So I wound up with another guy in the same office.
As soon as he walks in the chair isn’t even warm and he doesn’t have my EMR open and he says I need Statins. Why? My cholesterol is fine.
He looks at me like I’m a dick. Then goes into a routine of scaring me with horrible scenarios. This is in stark contrast to the Dr I was previously seeing.
So I tell him I know what Statins do to people. I’m active. I bike. Run. Walk. Not overweight. No shortness of breath. No chest pain.
Then he says his wife thought the same and had a heart attack anyway. At this point I’m not so sure I believe his story.
So I tell him Satins make you tired, lethargic, achy. So when I stop exercising and get fat you’ll tell me I’m overweight then put me on another prescription for weight loss! (Ozempic wasn’t out yet).
Needless to say I left with no intention of seeing him again. I wound up having to call a ringer that gave the office some shit for not letting me see the guy I originally wanted.
Next day they contacted me and said Dr “No Patients” will magically see me. Naturally because he works in the same office he asked me why I wasn’t seeing the other guy?
So I told him to pull up my lipid panel tests and tell me if you think I need Statins? He looked and said, no. Why?
Then I gently explained my point of view. This was maybe a year or two pre-Covid.
So he knows where I stand and knows there’s a limit to how much crap I’ll put up with.
Still, you’re right. There’s no law that says he has to put up with me. These are just routine exams after all.
It is unbelievably annoying the hoops you have to jump through, the bullshit you have to put up with, and the knowledge you have to possess to be able to find a good doctor. It’s absolutely ridiculous.
There is zero evidence been produced by anyone the stuff is actually in the food supply. In Australia, they are trying to use it in the beef stock when there is some sort of outbreak of any cattle type disease. This is a major concern for any meat eater. Because if they do vaccinate cattle with mRNA, we will not know about it as its not required to be on the labeling.
That is assumption with zero evidence of any programs anywhere that is proposed or being carried out. Even if they did want to put it in, they don't have the manufacturing capacity for the quantities required to ensure sufficient mRNA survives the water treatment and filtering process, which in all likelihood it would not.
Pharmaceuticals are already a major contaminant in tap water. If you are going to make it survive stomach acid, it can survive a lot of other environments too. Murphy's law applies.
Yes and those compounds were identified from streams and other water bodies in the wild. Not in the water coming out of the system post processing. That water depending on the country and city and the method of water supply to its citizens also plays a part in the level of pre treated contamination and post treatment contamination. My bigger concern lies with the contamination of wild waters that affect our food chain. However filtering technologies and other treatments for human water supply also change technologically therefore increasingly more effective at removing contaminants. Makes no difference, though in teh context of mRNA in the drinking water, evidence is king. Without it, its just rumor from the Internet echo chamber of conspiracy theory.
I did get a Novavax dose back in December, mainly because my parents would not be changed on their perspective. I was supposed to attend a Christmas party where one of my cousins had a second baby, and they didn't want me to spread it (Ironic, I get it). I don't drive, am still in school, and at this point expect to get more. Assuming the worst comes (I only dwell on these because of anxiety and what if thinking), don't say I wasn't warned. Though, pretty much everyone in my family is vaccinated and so far, nothing happened to anyone on both sides of the family.
As the Pfizer in Moderno vaccines easily saved a quarter billion, yes billion with a B, arrived at by simply extrapolating the numbers pre vaccine availability, more than likely to the five times more than that conservative estimate, your claims are simply bullshit.
It is 2024 and frankly, no matter what study shows "less harm" of anything produced by BigPharma, I will never take any of their products, ever again.
That includes aspirin, in case I get a headache from listening to their lies.
I do not do any tests or screening either, despite the push to have us diagnosed for something so they can subscribe some poison that will not solve anything anyway.
Luckily, for many years now I do not need any of their medicine, because I keep myself healthy by watching what I eat, doing sports and living life without fear.
When people fail to perform their own research and instead become brainwashed by conflicting propaganda of a supposed 'life-saving' treatment,
the deleterious and irreversible are inevitable. It's not astonishing to those who researched the concept of COVID as well as to those who worked in health care during SARS.Succumbing to mass deception is succumbing to self-demise
Only for really stupid people who did not receive the vaccine. Not getting the basic childhood vaccinations is blatantly fucking stupid. They’ve been perfected and it you’re playing with house money at thousands to one
Measles vaccines and the like used to work wonderfully (leaving aside issues with the vaccine overload that kids are now given). However, they (and other vaccines) only work in a person who has a functioning immune system. So for instance in the case of the mRNA vaccine, they have given it to immunocompromised people over and over and over again and it doesn't do a thing for them. Covid itself weakens a person's immune system. So what we are going to see is that people who have had covid are going to catch measles, even if they have had the regular measles shots. And the same with other childhood illnesses that have heretofore been prevented by vaccines. Covid will make the childhood vaccines non-functional, then they'll catch measles, and then they will lose protection against anything that they've caught or been vaccinated against in the past.
There is presently an enormous measles outbreak in Europe and the UK, and especially Eastern Europe. I am guessing this is due to immune damage due to covid itself, since it is mostly kids. But maybe the covid shots are a factor. The thing is, measles can wipe out pre-existing antibodies. Will this get rid of the IgG4 effect? I left this question for Rintrah, too.
Measles-vaccinated people are going to start catching measles, since multiple covid infections will weaken their immune systems so much that the vaccine won't work anymore. Vaccines aren't magic; they require a functioning immune system to work. Look it up. We're going back to the 1800s. Do you think it is a coincidence that we are having these measles outbreaks now? They are happening in areas with vaccination levels that had been adequate in the past. But that won't do the trick anymore, with covid damaged immune systems. By the way, even without covid, about 3 percent of people who are vaccinated for measles will still catch measles; it isn't perfect even without the covid factor.
There is no "measles epidemic", or any other epidemics, for that matter. There is no shingles epidemic, no flu epidemic, etc. Because measles is endemic, has been for decades. And the only reason the media is able to hype it up in their fearmongering, is because the vaccines made sure that more than half of the population in the Western world now has a reduced immune system, which causes people to succumb to any of the existing endemic viruses, that are in all of us.
So it is not the threat of the viruses, but the weakened vaccinated that are perceived as an epidemic. And they are the ones affected.
Just to keep in mind, when listening to the media..
Unfortunately, the result of the mass vaccination is more fearmongering and even more vaccination by those who are gullible: they clearly see as their health has taken a hit and the pharma companies and media are all to eager to provide the solution: more vaccines.
The only way out of this negative spiral is in a coffin.
I was trying to keep my comment short. I agree with much of what you have written.
However, covid itself does harm people, even if they are not vaccinated. A covid dog study was recently done and the covid-infected dogs (who were not vaccinated, and had no symptoms) developed serious neurological damage. Covid forms reservoirs in the unvaccinated as well as in the vaccinated.
And, there are more measles cases presently, and since they are in children and in Eastern Europe, it is likely to be at least early due to covid damage, rather than vaccine damage. So the question is, given that measles wipes out pre-existing antibodies, how will this affect the antibodies that people people are producing for covid (due to prior infections or the vaccines). That will be interesting to see.
Saying that Covid harms people is like saying that water is wet. Every virus "harms", because that's their job, it's how and why nature developed viruses.
It is all about context: humanity has accepted that as we are part of nature, we cannot detach from viruses, they are just as much part of nature.
Those that are still considering CV19 as something "worse" than other viruses have understood nothing from the past few years. That the harm done is due to the reaction or lack thereof of the authorities, globally. Isolation instead of treatment, mistreatment, total lack of treatment, these are the causes of the harm done. And the proof is in the global data: some countries did not even have excess mortality.
If it weren't Covid 19 but a regular flu, the outcome would have been the same. The only differences may have been stratified differences, genetics, lifestyle, nourishment and such.
You can quote as many studies as you want, these will not change the facts: that this virus would not have been any different if the hysteria had not taken over.
Which is why people really should stop fueling these repeated hysterical media hypes, fully sponsored by those that want you to get afraid from another threat and start vaccinating.
Sorry, but it is a bioweapon. It isn't the usual; I wish it were. And even if it were just a regular virus, I would protect my dogs from a regular virus, too. And no, I'm not vaccinated.
On that part I agree. I think it has been developed, certainly it does not behave like other viruses, there are numerous credible sources stating the same phenomena regarding the temporary loss of taste for example.
But if it is a weapon, it has pretty much been shooting blanks..
The thing with meddling with nature is that you never know what you get, once you start playing with the toys. And I think they failed to make this into something that is stronger than a flu or a bad cold.
The fact that it is different, does not make it worse.
My personal experience and that of many people I know is that we slept it off in a day or three. In my case, the sleepy part was preceded by a change of taste, some types of food (mainly sweet ones) tasted like soap.
But overall, for me it was much milder than the flu and colds I had ever had every year before that.
Now, one might say that's anecdotal and someone else had it much worse than a flu. That is true too, I know people who complained about that. On a sidenote, these were typically the people who were gullible enough to get vaccinated, so I sense a strong bias as a result of the propaganda that influenced the way they perceived their own illness.
But putting aside even that, I do believe that some people had it worse.
So the question is: was it worse, overall? Clearly, we will not know based on anecdotal evidence, my circles seemed to have it less severe, then again I know more healthy people since my circles consist of many active people and not rampant obesity.
So the only credible source are statistics. And a proper analysis, taking into consideration the strong manipulation of the data by the authorities, whose interest it was to portray the virus as much worse than it was. Not just through testing everyone constantly, a hitherto unknown practice, but also by using a test that was not meant for it, was clearly flawed and got pulled out right before the mass vaccination started, so that it would seem as if the vaccination effect was positive.
But despite all the manipulation, they did not manage to hide all the data. And I'm not just talking about the recent push to hide all the vaccination harm, but also the initial true effect of the virus.
Because I did the analysis from the start of 2020 and quite clearly the extent of excess mortality, the only viable parameter to determine whether something statistically worse was taking place is showing one clear thing: whatever excess mortality was taking place in 2020, it was not due to the corona virus..
Before anyone starts pointing at the countries with clear excess mortality before there was a vaccine, let me point out some clear flaws in the methods of people who do not understand the basics of scientific analysis.
1. Apples to apples: you cannot simply compare countries with each other. There are vast geographical differences within the US for example influencing climate, not to speak of the different approaches of Florida compared to California for example. Then there's the age difference of states with more elderly. Then there's the difference in eating habits between countries, the Japanese are hardly obese but then they have more elderly. Then there's the way some countries like Sweden put old people in a pensioner home so any virus sweeps over them in a second, while the Italians keep generations under one roof, but then the infamous Treviso area was full of heavy smoking elderly, etc.
The number of parameters are endless. And even when comparing exactly the same areas, data is tricky: Germany seemed to have had a slight excess mortality. But if one looks at the population change (migration is rampant), one sees that corrected for the increase in population, there was actually no statistically significant excess mortality. Despite some horrible measures taken! And this is valid for some countries with significant changes in population due to recent migration, the numbers of which are even hidden to avoid uproar.
What does work however for comparison, is very unique "pockets" where almost identical regions right next to each other face a totally different approach. There was only one such instance in the world like this, where data was still being monitored well: in Denmark, there was a totally different approach by a bunch of regions next to each other. And here it showed, that the ones taking the liberal approach of no lockdowns and hysteria, showed no excess mortality. I don't have the link at hand but it has been published, I'm sure you can look it up.
This is clear evidence of the huge impact that the interventions had, in a negative way. Which tells a lot about how much milder the virus had been, if people were treated instead of isolated, not put on ventilators that basically killed instead of curing, if they had been allowed to keep exercising instead of closing the gym, etc.
2. Interpretation of what we consider "excess mortality" : every single data source had been manipulated. In my country, it was not just putting all illness and deaths into the Covid basket, even when the person never had a complaint and got over it quickly, perhaps just had a false positive test, but he had an accident months later and the death certificate said Covid. This inflation of the data was just on the input side. But it's worse than that: they were meddling with the output as well, retroactively!
I was doing a weekly download from our health authorities on death numbers and noticed something strange. It is normal that there is a backlog, usually in a busy season like Christmas, when viruses take the elderly, but due to holidays data collection slows down, but picks up again in the months after. In other words, you may have deaths from December that only get reported in May and data gets corrected retroactively for December. Such correction is spread out rather evenly, if you do this exercise at any given time, like I have been doing after this period, for a benchmark. This is normal and therefore acceptable.
What was not normal for the winter of 2020/21 however, is that I noticed that the rate at which the number of dead were added, was INCREASING at an ever higher rate. And not just that, but the timespan that backlogs were related to increased from about 5 months to over 9 months! In other words, considering the backlog in administration, it would make sense that the manpower they have available to process the data makes for a constant data correction for each past month and you could close down a given month after a while. Instead what I saw that for a given month in that winter, the number of retroactive deaths added was increasing exponentially, FOR A SELECT FEW MONTHS ONLY. And suddenly, by mid of 2021 they were still "finding" deaths in 2020 months, an absurdly long time back.
And you can guess for which months this stopped: exactly, right when the vaccines were being rolled out, for the months starting then suddenly much less deaths were found in a backlog. So the early months of 2021 did NOT see an increase of death numbers in the following half year after that. As if by some miracle, the backlog was only existent for the few months before the vaccination. So people were made to believe that that is when many more people died. And since you can play around with the death numbers by putting them in whatever basket you want, I am convinced that the numbers we see now are not the correct numbers. I am sure that many people that died in 2021 are seen in the 2020 statistics. If ever a comprehensive research would take place, heads would roll, because the death certificates are still supposed to be on paper (the push to electronic is very clear, from which point on you can basically change history at the press of a button).
This analysis by the way is unique in the sense that the authorities do not keep the snapshots of the data in public view.. In other words, if one does not download the fresh data, one does not know that a particular week in the past had much lower deaths shown just a few weeks ago. Also, it takes time: you need to watch and download the data a year after a period you want to see, so you can track the difference in backlog administration.
To sum it up: the excess death figures have been heavily manipulated at a central point. And while they are sitting on the data, if someone did not do the due diligence of downloading their data on a weekly basis, you could not notice how they inflated the numbers retroactively.
In other words: the statistics are lying. Not only was there no excess mortality caused by the virus, instead by the human irrational reaction, often through coercion, but even the real data gave been manipulated. And I'm pretty sure many countries have been doing this, the same way that association with Covid for example was done via a test whose cycles were done by labs differently on a country by country basis, sometimes even differently within a country. And we will never know which lab actually used proper cycle numbers as they will never admit to manipulating these. We all know someone with a false positive or even false negative.
Again, I agree with most of what you have written. Including about the manipulation of data. But that is of historical interest at this point.
For you are looking at the acute phase of the virus. I don't care about the acute phase. It is the reservoirs it forms in the brain, the testes, the bone marrow, the gut. Autopsies are finding that no-one clears this thing. Read a day's worth of tweets (and linked studies) by Daniel Brittain Dugger; he is an AIDS activist who is now focusing on covid (that would be easier than me summarizing his arguments). He is somewhat repetitive (since he needs to be) and he is not a genius but he is not a moron and I am convinced; this is going to be like AIDS, destroying the immune system over the course of years. I was living in San Francisco in the mid-80s and I remember that AIDS was "just a cold" when people caught it (I also remember that Fauci was a moron and a psychopath). Then ten years down the road it was something else altogether. That is happening faster with covid We are already seeing the outbreaks of diseases that people with weakened immune systems get.
You are good at looking at information but you are being selective in your focus. I hope that you will be open minded here and at least look at what I'm describing. We need smart people to figure out how to either clear these reservoirs (unlikely) or provide ongoing antivirals to billions of people.
The problem is likely due to the spike protein being produced by your own cells from mrna transfection. The immune system is initially confused at first having to attack not just the spike proteins but own cells expressing them. As it encounters more and more own cells creating the spike proteins, it 'learns' that there is no virus around but own cells are producing it, and based on logic of learning, whether computer or cells, it ignores the spikes and cells expressing them from then on, because it probably received signals that the body is distress every time it attacks the spikes and own cells creating them. If it doesn't ignore, it will create a bad auto-immune situation for the transfectee. It's either that or the alternative consequences of repeated infections. No brainer. Simple logic/algorithm of either computer model or human/cell logic.
Off topic, but yesterday Zero Hedge published one of my most-important “early spread” stories. To my knowledge, this is the first time this alternative media website (with millions of readers) has run a story that theorizes that many millions of people had already been infected by the novel coronavirus BEFORE the Wuhan outbreak (and/or the lockdowns to “prevent spread.”)
To me, this is a big deal. I wrote an article thanking the Tylers for running this piece. My article includes several bullet points giving the reasons I think “Early Spread” is extremely important and, if conclusively “proven,” would detonate most of the authorized narratives about this faux pandemic.
Vaccines ... all of them ... attack the microbiome. This is real. It is a seminal principle. It damages human health exactly as crops are compromised by death of the microbiome in the top soil via chemical farming as opposed to ROA. It is at the heart of immune and cognitive impairments that are no longer in doubt related to vaccines generally. Dr. Hazan is not the only researcher in this field, but her many interviews have spotlighted the phenomenon.
Are you aware that natural birth babies born to unvaccinated mothers have LOADS of bifidobacteria in the gut? Babies born to COVID vaccinated mothers have NONE. This means immune compromise, allergy to breast milk, developmental delays and trips to the hospital
In the first year of life if they are not among the 30x increase in still births. We met folks in exactly this category. The shots are sheer quackery
What happens to over vaccinated children? They grow up to the age of millennials and die when their bosses mandate the shots. These were the 61000 group life payouts in ‘21 called the “silent Viet Nam War” by Ed Dowd. Age 35 was birth year 1986. Ring a bell?
What happens when children are raised with no childhood shots? The best health outcomes by far. The doctors who tried publishing the data were censored and punished.
I know you try to be objective, but don’t expect to have an easy time researching this on your laptop. Check with Children’s Health Defense
What is I fucking hate people that just say shit has nothing to do with reality like they know what the fuck they’re talking about their talking about….
It's likely not the technology per se, but the essence thereof, that is the culprit.
Specifically, that the dosage of the active moiety (the spike protein) is unknown. We know mRNA stays in the body for up to as long as the longest studies ran (6 months), and it continues producing spike protein.
It would appear reasonable to hypothesize that such uncontrolled persistent expression of spike protein would desensitize the body and result in elevated levels of IgG4 antibodies.
That being said, Novavax contains the same antigen (spike protein) hence it's the same exact poison -- just a smaller (and known) amount of it.
Although well known, this is bad news. The mod- RNA platform is not suitable for use as a vaccine. It does not work and has significant side effects. Unfortunately, at the moment it looks like all vaccines will be switched to this platform. The classic ones (although they are not good either) as well as the new developments against all x germs and viruses that do not even exist yet. The reason for this is that mod-RNA technology is cheap. In fact, a vaccine can be produced in a very short time because the m-RNA is simply thrown together on a PC. Companies are saving millions in production. And now that the platform is approved, they don't even need to spend money on expensive clinical trials and studies. It's crazy.
Unlike the PCR amplification manufacturing method used in the trial, the one for mass inoculation was made using the amplification manufacturing method using Escherichia coli, so contamination with endotoxin(More toxic/unit than potassium cyanide), dsDNA, microRNA, etc. is severe.
My friend was coerced to take novavax and nearly died a few days later and has been sick ever since with heart issues and autoimmune issues. She was previously completely healthy.
Ugh, Novavax. I was all about that one until i found out the sordid history of corona virus vaccine development even sans mRNA and I said no way in HELL.
Interestingly, I would have taken Novavax and enjoyed some potentially life threatening symptoms had the elites not delayed it for so long in order to secure test subjects for the mRNA sludge. That delay gave me time to expand my research beyond mRNA.
And the funny thing was that I was STILL attacked as a "dangerous antivaxxer" while being an avid and very vocal supporter of Novavax! Generally by people who had no idea how each type of jab even worked, because there is no judgmental ass like one who hasn't bothered to do any reading on the subject.
That link took me to some goofy ad and nothing else
Please Tell your friend to go to the FLCCC.org website, look for their iRecover protocol, start reading. Or, she can also go to the Wellness Company website, TWC, and read their offerings. Both offer telemedicine options, work with "long covid and vaxx injuries, and I am not their sales rep. Only wondering why no one else has suggested this earlier, eh?
be cautious about the Wellness Company
Walking conflict of interest.
Tommy, can you say “charlatan”?
I purchased an emergency kit for myself and my husband in the early fall. They came in handy when we both caught "covid" for the first time in early November. Neither of us took the jab.
The emergency kit contains a few different antibiotics, an anti-fungal, ivermectin, and an anti-nausea medication. They are dispensed from participating pharmacies. TWC has different kit specifically for covid. Most doctors will not prescribe any of these medications for covid. And my doctor is still out on leave 'cause covid. I don't know if she's injured or scared.
I've also taken TWC spike support (along with bromelain and the curcumin I'd been taking for the past two years for a frozen shoulder). I developed two different autoimmune diseases shortly after my first flu years ago. I didn't want a repeat. If these naturally occurring substances can clear the viral proteins from my body quickly, I'm all for it.
While I agree that we should all be cautious about anyone and everyone, I'm really struggling to understand the attack on McCullough and TWC. They're providing a service that few others can or will. Jeff Bezos sucks, but people still use Amazon and shop at Whole Foods. Bill Gates is a demon, but people still use Microsoft. Unless you think they're poisoning people?
What a sucker. None of those things are antiviral. The vaccine is far more effective than any of that shit.
Here's another with additional links to more articles...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28196978/
From 2017 Journal of Antibiotics....
"Today, ivermectin is continuing to surprise and excite scientists, offering more and more promise to help improve global public health by treating a diverse range of diseases, with its unexpected potential as an antibacterial, antiviral and anti-cancer agent being particularly extraordinary."
https://www.nature.com/articles/ja201711
I'm sure you'll convince many people with your winning personality, Hudson. I'm feeling generous today, so I bestow my experimental gene transfection jabs to you. What are we up to now? Seven? 'Cause the jabs works soooooo well. Obviously.
It does. You are 14 times less likely to end up in the emergency room or dead if you have had the vaccination and 9 to 12 month boosters. It’s not fucking simple. If you simply extrapolate the numbers pre-vaccine it has saved a quarter billion lives minimum planet wide it’s caused 50,000 direct deaths in over 19 billion injections. Over 98% of all post injection trauma was a sore injection site. As an a short sore shoulder. You just making ridiculous claims pretty much confirms my point. You got nothing but fucking stupid claims and ad hominem bullshit. You have no credible evidence whatsoever. you’re just talking out the side of your face with your head up your ass.
Really? had not heard anything except Dr Mike Yeadon saying they are using fear of flu the next pandemic to sell their kits. Not passing judgement, simply cannot obtain many of their offerings in US drugstores without a script and most standard doctors do not acknowledge injury and will not prescribe.
What is wrong with the Wellness Company?
Glad you are urging caution!
What is wrong with the Wellness Company??
I do not like the manner in which they promote their supplements
It's interesting you bring that up. I hear them a lot on the McCullough report and while I love the doc, I think the advertising for Nattokinese is over the rails by rightout claiming that it removes the spike protein and that it is a PROVEN method. Even Dr Mccullough is cautious in making such claims, he rather says that they had positive results so far in his practice, but in a Q&A he also answered that currently there is no proven method of removing spike protein alltogether.
The Wellness Company is not to be mistaken for the doctors who want to help their patients and clinging to any hope of products claiming to help.
What "manner" do you not like in which they promote their supplements?
Be more specific please
I urge caution in ALL matters these days. We are, after all, talking about ingesting a substance(s) into the human body to counter effects from the jab. Urging caution and doing due diligence does not imply "wrong" but after these past few years I question EVERYTHING!
Nattokinase is actually derived from a fermented soy food long traditional in Japan. Pre-pandemic, it was recommended as a blood pressure regulator, as it acts both as an anticoagulant and vasodilator. Apparently, recent findings show it also blocks the action of the spike protein from locking into the cell’s ACE receptor.
95% of soy products in the world are GMOd for Roundup tolerance.
Did she take any other Covid jabs prior to Novavax? If so, which and how many, when? Any insight into that?
Yes, the spike protein is toxic and can provoke autoimmune responses which includes heart issues. The mRNA delivery just adds additional potential adverse responses as well as long term exposure to the spike protein.
Proteins can be dangerous on many levels. Most animal/seafood allergies occur because the immune system recognizes proteins in the exoskeleton of shellfish or animal excretions as toxic.
Cat allergies for example have nothing to do with fur and everything to do with cat’s obsession with licking itself thus depositing protein laden saliva onto its body which then sloughs off on dander that floats microscopically in the air.
Once inhaled the afflicted’s immune system goes into overdrive sometimes resulting in anaphylactic shock. Every physician knows this.
So when I explained to my doctor that my propensity towards overreaction to proteins is why I avoided the shot, he claimed he was impressed that I made what he referred to as a rational decision and immediately took it off my chart and stopped pestering me about taking it.
You have a better doctor than most
Sort of. He still embraces the concept, “We were dealing with something new, we were learning, we didn’t know.”
The fact he didn't immediately argue/mock/disrespect/metaphorically spit on you for not just lying there like meat on a plate and never using your own brain to make your own medical choices puts him head and shoulders above a lot of docs I've heard about.
I had a doc I liked a lot. He quit and moved. I’m in generally good health for a 67 year old and get a yearly physical.
I called the office and asked to see the guy I see now. No can do, said the gatekeepers. Not taking new patients. So I wound up with another guy in the same office.
As soon as he walks in the chair isn’t even warm and he doesn’t have my EMR open and he says I need Statins. Why? My cholesterol is fine.
He looks at me like I’m a dick. Then goes into a routine of scaring me with horrible scenarios. This is in stark contrast to the Dr I was previously seeing.
So I tell him I know what Statins do to people. I’m active. I bike. Run. Walk. Not overweight. No shortness of breath. No chest pain.
Then he says his wife thought the same and had a heart attack anyway. At this point I’m not so sure I believe his story.
So I tell him Satins make you tired, lethargic, achy. So when I stop exercising and get fat you’ll tell me I’m overweight then put me on another prescription for weight loss! (Ozempic wasn’t out yet).
Needless to say I left with no intention of seeing him again. I wound up having to call a ringer that gave the office some shit for not letting me see the guy I originally wanted.
Next day they contacted me and said Dr “No Patients” will magically see me. Naturally because he works in the same office he asked me why I wasn’t seeing the other guy?
So I told him to pull up my lipid panel tests and tell me if you think I need Statins? He looked and said, no. Why?
Then I gently explained my point of view. This was maybe a year or two pre-Covid.
So he knows where I stand and knows there’s a limit to how much crap I’ll put up with.
Still, you’re right. There’s no law that says he has to put up with me. These are just routine exams after all.
It is unbelievably annoying the hoops you have to jump through, the bullshit you have to put up with, and the knowledge you have to possess to be able to find a good doctor. It’s absolutely ridiculous.
Yes, Novavax damages the heart too like the mRNA sewage.
Why do you feel the need to use code to say "they" are putting mRNA in food?
this is persistent commercial spam about "mrna-free food" sold by a particular website.
Hint: all food contains mrna
These people are the maggots of daily life. Thanks for deleting.
There is zero evidence been produced by anyone the stuff is actually in the food supply. In Australia, they are trying to use it in the beef stock when there is some sort of outbreak of any cattle type disease. This is a major concern for any meat eater. Because if they do vaccinate cattle with mRNA, we will not know about it as its not required to be on the labeling.
https://www.beefcentral.com/news/mrna-technology-project-aims-to-rapidly-produce-cattle-disease-vaccines/
Could be in tap water too ...
That is assumption with zero evidence of any programs anywhere that is proposed or being carried out. Even if they did want to put it in, they don't have the manufacturing capacity for the quantities required to ensure sufficient mRNA survives the water treatment and filtering process, which in all likelihood it would not.
BTW, we are referring to this kind of garbage.
https://www.precisionvaccinations.com/2024/01/19/927-million-funds-oral-xbb-covid-19-vaccine-candidate-development
Pharmaceuticals are already a major contaminant in tap water. If you are going to make it survive stomach acid, it can survive a lot of other environments too. Murphy's law applies.
https://www.acsh.org/news/2021/01/15/do-pharmaceuticals-drinking-water-pose-health-risk-15279
And caffeine has been found at 800 ft depth in Puget Sound.
Where I live we get drinking water from a deep aquifer. Not too worried about other than the garbage from City water lines and my own pipes.
Yes and those compounds were identified from streams and other water bodies in the wild. Not in the water coming out of the system post processing. That water depending on the country and city and the method of water supply to its citizens also plays a part in the level of pre treated contamination and post treatment contamination. My bigger concern lies with the contamination of wild waters that affect our food chain. However filtering technologies and other treatments for human water supply also change technologically therefore increasingly more effective at removing contaminants. Makes no difference, though in teh context of mRNA in the drinking water, evidence is king. Without it, its just rumor from the Internet echo chamber of conspiracy theory.
I did get a Novavax dose back in December, mainly because my parents would not be changed on their perspective. I was supposed to attend a Christmas party where one of my cousins had a second baby, and they didn't want me to spread it (Ironic, I get it). I don't drive, am still in school, and at this point expect to get more. Assuming the worst comes (I only dwell on these because of anxiety and what if thinking), don't say I wasn't warned. Though, pretty much everyone in my family is vaccinated and so far, nothing happened to anyone on both sides of the family.
As the Pfizer in Moderno vaccines easily saved a quarter billion, yes billion with a B, arrived at by simply extrapolating the numbers pre vaccine availability, more than likely to the five times more than that conservative estimate, your claims are simply bullshit.
Coincidentally, this week I offer a full protocol for navigating autoimmune issues: https://www.brunettegardens.com/p/navigating-the-autoimmune-condition
So how does one reverse the effects of the mRNA vaccine? Is it even possible to do so?
It is 2024 and frankly, no matter what study shows "less harm" of anything produced by BigPharma, I will never take any of their products, ever again.
That includes aspirin, in case I get a headache from listening to their lies.
I do not do any tests or screening either, despite the push to have us diagnosed for something so they can subscribe some poison that will not solve anything anyway.
Luckily, for many years now I do not need any of their medicine, because I keep myself healthy by watching what I eat, doing sports and living life without fear.
That's all you need to avoid their concoctions.
What a crock of Ajit prop bullshit. You suck at this dude. I hope you get a side gig because you’re not gonna last long at this shit
When people fail to perform their own research and instead become brainwashed by conflicting propaganda of a supposed 'life-saving' treatment,
the deleterious and irreversible are inevitable. It's not astonishing to those who researched the concept of COVID as well as to those who worked in health care during SARS.Succumbing to mass deception is succumbing to self-demise
Will the current measles epidemic take care of this problem? Since measles wipes out pre-existing antibodies.
Only for really stupid people who did not receive the vaccine. Not getting the basic childhood vaccinations is blatantly fucking stupid. They’ve been perfected and it you’re playing with house money at thousands to one
Measles vaccines and the like used to work wonderfully (leaving aside issues with the vaccine overload that kids are now given). However, they (and other vaccines) only work in a person who has a functioning immune system. So for instance in the case of the mRNA vaccine, they have given it to immunocompromised people over and over and over again and it doesn't do a thing for them. Covid itself weakens a person's immune system. So what we are going to see is that people who have had covid are going to catch measles, even if they have had the regular measles shots. And the same with other childhood illnesses that have heretofore been prevented by vaccines. Covid will make the childhood vaccines non-functional, then they'll catch measles, and then they will lose protection against anything that they've caught or been vaccinated against in the past.
great question :-)
There is presently an enormous measles outbreak in Europe and the UK, and especially Eastern Europe. I am guessing this is due to immune damage due to covid itself, since it is mostly kids. But maybe the covid shots are a factor. The thing is, measles can wipe out pre-existing antibodies. Will this get rid of the IgG4 effect? I left this question for Rintrah, too.
No. It simply by not being vaccinated. What a dumb fucking comment ,….vaccinated people don’t get measles brain is that fucking simple.
Do you know one of the side effects of the measles? Dying of the fucking measles !
Measles-vaccinated people are going to start catching measles, since multiple covid infections will weaken their immune systems so much that the vaccine won't work anymore. Vaccines aren't magic; they require a functioning immune system to work. Look it up. We're going back to the 1800s. Do you think it is a coincidence that we are having these measles outbreaks now? They are happening in areas with vaccination levels that had been adequate in the past. But that won't do the trick anymore, with covid damaged immune systems. By the way, even without covid, about 3 percent of people who are vaccinated for measles will still catch measles; it isn't perfect even without the covid factor.
There is no "measles epidemic", or any other epidemics, for that matter. There is no shingles epidemic, no flu epidemic, etc. Because measles is endemic, has been for decades. And the only reason the media is able to hype it up in their fearmongering, is because the vaccines made sure that more than half of the population in the Western world now has a reduced immune system, which causes people to succumb to any of the existing endemic viruses, that are in all of us.
So it is not the threat of the viruses, but the weakened vaccinated that are perceived as an epidemic. And they are the ones affected.
Just to keep in mind, when listening to the media..
Unfortunately, the result of the mass vaccination is more fearmongering and even more vaccination by those who are gullible: they clearly see as their health has taken a hit and the pharma companies and media are all to eager to provide the solution: more vaccines.
The only way out of this negative spiral is in a coffin.
You must’ve worked really hard to become that detached from reality. Well done, I guess….
I was trying to keep my comment short. I agree with much of what you have written.
However, covid itself does harm people, even if they are not vaccinated. A covid dog study was recently done and the covid-infected dogs (who were not vaccinated, and had no symptoms) developed serious neurological damage. Covid forms reservoirs in the unvaccinated as well as in the vaccinated.
And, there are more measles cases presently, and since they are in children and in Eastern Europe, it is likely to be at least early due to covid damage, rather than vaccine damage. So the question is, given that measles wipes out pre-existing antibodies, how will this affect the antibodies that people people are producing for covid (due to prior infections or the vaccines). That will be interesting to see.
Saying that Covid harms people is like saying that water is wet. Every virus "harms", because that's their job, it's how and why nature developed viruses.
It is all about context: humanity has accepted that as we are part of nature, we cannot detach from viruses, they are just as much part of nature.
Those that are still considering CV19 as something "worse" than other viruses have understood nothing from the past few years. That the harm done is due to the reaction or lack thereof of the authorities, globally. Isolation instead of treatment, mistreatment, total lack of treatment, these are the causes of the harm done. And the proof is in the global data: some countries did not even have excess mortality.
If it weren't Covid 19 but a regular flu, the outcome would have been the same. The only differences may have been stratified differences, genetics, lifestyle, nourishment and such.
You can quote as many studies as you want, these will not change the facts: that this virus would not have been any different if the hysteria had not taken over.
Which is why people really should stop fueling these repeated hysterical media hypes, fully sponsored by those that want you to get afraid from another threat and start vaccinating.
Sorry, but it is a bioweapon. It isn't the usual; I wish it were. And even if it were just a regular virus, I would protect my dogs from a regular virus, too. And no, I'm not vaccinated.
On that part I agree. I think it has been developed, certainly it does not behave like other viruses, there are numerous credible sources stating the same phenomena regarding the temporary loss of taste for example.
But if it is a weapon, it has pretty much been shooting blanks..
The thing with meddling with nature is that you never know what you get, once you start playing with the toys. And I think they failed to make this into something that is stronger than a flu or a bad cold.
The fact that it is different, does not make it worse.
My personal experience and that of many people I know is that we slept it off in a day or three. In my case, the sleepy part was preceded by a change of taste, some types of food (mainly sweet ones) tasted like soap.
But overall, for me it was much milder than the flu and colds I had ever had every year before that.
Now, one might say that's anecdotal and someone else had it much worse than a flu. That is true too, I know people who complained about that. On a sidenote, these were typically the people who were gullible enough to get vaccinated, so I sense a strong bias as a result of the propaganda that influenced the way they perceived their own illness.
But putting aside even that, I do believe that some people had it worse.
So the question is: was it worse, overall? Clearly, we will not know based on anecdotal evidence, my circles seemed to have it less severe, then again I know more healthy people since my circles consist of many active people and not rampant obesity.
So the only credible source are statistics. And a proper analysis, taking into consideration the strong manipulation of the data by the authorities, whose interest it was to portray the virus as much worse than it was. Not just through testing everyone constantly, a hitherto unknown practice, but also by using a test that was not meant for it, was clearly flawed and got pulled out right before the mass vaccination started, so that it would seem as if the vaccination effect was positive.
But despite all the manipulation, they did not manage to hide all the data. And I'm not just talking about the recent push to hide all the vaccination harm, but also the initial true effect of the virus.
Because I did the analysis from the start of 2020 and quite clearly the extent of excess mortality, the only viable parameter to determine whether something statistically worse was taking place is showing one clear thing: whatever excess mortality was taking place in 2020, it was not due to the corona virus..
Before anyone starts pointing at the countries with clear excess mortality before there was a vaccine, let me point out some clear flaws in the methods of people who do not understand the basics of scientific analysis.
1. Apples to apples: you cannot simply compare countries with each other. There are vast geographical differences within the US for example influencing climate, not to speak of the different approaches of Florida compared to California for example. Then there's the age difference of states with more elderly. Then there's the difference in eating habits between countries, the Japanese are hardly obese but then they have more elderly. Then there's the way some countries like Sweden put old people in a pensioner home so any virus sweeps over them in a second, while the Italians keep generations under one roof, but then the infamous Treviso area was full of heavy smoking elderly, etc.
The number of parameters are endless. And even when comparing exactly the same areas, data is tricky: Germany seemed to have had a slight excess mortality. But if one looks at the population change (migration is rampant), one sees that corrected for the increase in population, there was actually no statistically significant excess mortality. Despite some horrible measures taken! And this is valid for some countries with significant changes in population due to recent migration, the numbers of which are even hidden to avoid uproar.
What does work however for comparison, is very unique "pockets" where almost identical regions right next to each other face a totally different approach. There was only one such instance in the world like this, where data was still being monitored well: in Denmark, there was a totally different approach by a bunch of regions next to each other. And here it showed, that the ones taking the liberal approach of no lockdowns and hysteria, showed no excess mortality. I don't have the link at hand but it has been published, I'm sure you can look it up.
This is clear evidence of the huge impact that the interventions had, in a negative way. Which tells a lot about how much milder the virus had been, if people were treated instead of isolated, not put on ventilators that basically killed instead of curing, if they had been allowed to keep exercising instead of closing the gym, etc.
2. Interpretation of what we consider "excess mortality" : every single data source had been manipulated. In my country, it was not just putting all illness and deaths into the Covid basket, even when the person never had a complaint and got over it quickly, perhaps just had a false positive test, but he had an accident months later and the death certificate said Covid. This inflation of the data was just on the input side. But it's worse than that: they were meddling with the output as well, retroactively!
I was doing a weekly download from our health authorities on death numbers and noticed something strange. It is normal that there is a backlog, usually in a busy season like Christmas, when viruses take the elderly, but due to holidays data collection slows down, but picks up again in the months after. In other words, you may have deaths from December that only get reported in May and data gets corrected retroactively for December. Such correction is spread out rather evenly, if you do this exercise at any given time, like I have been doing after this period, for a benchmark. This is normal and therefore acceptable.
What was not normal for the winter of 2020/21 however, is that I noticed that the rate at which the number of dead were added, was INCREASING at an ever higher rate. And not just that, but the timespan that backlogs were related to increased from about 5 months to over 9 months! In other words, considering the backlog in administration, it would make sense that the manpower they have available to process the data makes for a constant data correction for each past month and you could close down a given month after a while. Instead what I saw that for a given month in that winter, the number of retroactive deaths added was increasing exponentially, FOR A SELECT FEW MONTHS ONLY. And suddenly, by mid of 2021 they were still "finding" deaths in 2020 months, an absurdly long time back.
And you can guess for which months this stopped: exactly, right when the vaccines were being rolled out, for the months starting then suddenly much less deaths were found in a backlog. So the early months of 2021 did NOT see an increase of death numbers in the following half year after that. As if by some miracle, the backlog was only existent for the few months before the vaccination. So people were made to believe that that is when many more people died. And since you can play around with the death numbers by putting them in whatever basket you want, I am convinced that the numbers we see now are not the correct numbers. I am sure that many people that died in 2021 are seen in the 2020 statistics. If ever a comprehensive research would take place, heads would roll, because the death certificates are still supposed to be on paper (the push to electronic is very clear, from which point on you can basically change history at the press of a button).
This analysis by the way is unique in the sense that the authorities do not keep the snapshots of the data in public view.. In other words, if one does not download the fresh data, one does not know that a particular week in the past had much lower deaths shown just a few weeks ago. Also, it takes time: you need to watch and download the data a year after a period you want to see, so you can track the difference in backlog administration.
To sum it up: the excess death figures have been heavily manipulated at a central point. And while they are sitting on the data, if someone did not do the due diligence of downloading their data on a weekly basis, you could not notice how they inflated the numbers retroactively.
In other words: the statistics are lying. Not only was there no excess mortality caused by the virus, instead by the human irrational reaction, often through coercion, but even the real data gave been manipulated. And I'm pretty sure many countries have been doing this, the same way that association with Covid for example was done via a test whose cycles were done by labs differently on a country by country basis, sometimes even differently within a country. And we will never know which lab actually used proper cycle numbers as they will never admit to manipulating these. We all know someone with a false positive or even false negative.
Again, I agree with most of what you have written. Including about the manipulation of data. But that is of historical interest at this point.
For you are looking at the acute phase of the virus. I don't care about the acute phase. It is the reservoirs it forms in the brain, the testes, the bone marrow, the gut. Autopsies are finding that no-one clears this thing. Read a day's worth of tweets (and linked studies) by Daniel Brittain Dugger; he is an AIDS activist who is now focusing on covid (that would be easier than me summarizing his arguments). He is somewhat repetitive (since he needs to be) and he is not a genius but he is not a moron and I am convinced; this is going to be like AIDS, destroying the immune system over the course of years. I was living in San Francisco in the mid-80s and I remember that AIDS was "just a cold" when people caught it (I also remember that Fauci was a moron and a psychopath). Then ten years down the road it was something else altogether. That is happening faster with covid We are already seeing the outbreaks of diseases that people with weakened immune systems get.
You are good at looking at information but you are being selective in your focus. I hope that you will be open minded here and at least look at what I'm describing. We need smart people to figure out how to either clear these reservoirs (unlikely) or provide ongoing antivirals to billions of people.
The common denominator in ALL injuries related to nanoparticle-poisoning is most likely altered protein:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/what-do-peanut-allergy-lyme-and-arthritis
Injections are not needed, although they are faster and more efficient to take control of the victim.
The problem is likely due to the spike protein being produced by your own cells from mrna transfection. The immune system is initially confused at first having to attack not just the spike proteins but own cells expressing them. As it encounters more and more own cells creating the spike proteins, it 'learns' that there is no virus around but own cells are producing it, and based on logic of learning, whether computer or cells, it ignores the spikes and cells expressing them from then on, because it probably received signals that the body is distress every time it attacks the spikes and own cells creating them. If it doesn't ignore, it will create a bad auto-immune situation for the transfectee. It's either that or the alternative consequences of repeated infections. No brainer. Simple logic/algorithm of either computer model or human/cell logic.
Off topic, but yesterday Zero Hedge published one of my most-important “early spread” stories. To my knowledge, this is the first time this alternative media website (with millions of readers) has run a story that theorizes that many millions of people had already been infected by the novel coronavirus BEFORE the Wuhan outbreak (and/or the lockdowns to “prevent spread.”)
To me, this is a big deal. I wrote an article thanking the Tylers for running this piece. My article includes several bullet points giving the reasons I think “Early Spread” is extremely important and, if conclusively “proven,” would detonate most of the authorized narratives about this faux pandemic.
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/thank-you-zero-hedge?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
Vaccines ... all of them ... attack the microbiome. This is real. It is a seminal principle. It damages human health exactly as crops are compromised by death of the microbiome in the top soil via chemical farming as opposed to ROA. It is at the heart of immune and cognitive impairments that are no longer in doubt related to vaccines generally. Dr. Hazan is not the only researcher in this field, but her many interviews have spotlighted the phenomenon.
Are you aware that natural birth babies born to unvaccinated mothers have LOADS of bifidobacteria in the gut? Babies born to COVID vaccinated mothers have NONE. This means immune compromise, allergy to breast milk, developmental delays and trips to the hospital
In the first year of life if they are not among the 30x increase in still births. We met folks in exactly this category. The shots are sheer quackery
What happens to over vaccinated children? They grow up to the age of millennials and die when their bosses mandate the shots. These were the 61000 group life payouts in ‘21 called the “silent Viet Nam War” by Ed Dowd. Age 35 was birth year 1986. Ring a bell?
What happens when children are raised with no childhood shots? The best health outcomes by far. The doctors who tried publishing the data were censored and punished.
I know you try to be objective, but don’t expect to have an easy time researching this on your laptop. Check with Children’s Health Defense
What is I fucking hate people that just say shit has nothing to do with reality like they know what the fuck they’re talking about their talking about….
Can you share a link for the 30x increase in stillbirths? Thanks.
Mercola quotes 27x spontaneous abortions. But still births not called out explicitly.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/pregnant-women-forced-covid-shots-cola/
The next article from CHD discusses drop in birth rate due to the shots but i did not see still births called out separately.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/switzerland-miscarriages-stillbirths-covid-shots/
The number 30x was a quote from a nurse who estimated this increase from experience, but I did not copy the link.
It's likely not the technology per se, but the essence thereof, that is the culprit.
Specifically, that the dosage of the active moiety (the spike protein) is unknown. We know mRNA stays in the body for up to as long as the longest studies ran (6 months), and it continues producing spike protein.
It would appear reasonable to hypothesize that such uncontrolled persistent expression of spike protein would desensitize the body and result in elevated levels of IgG4 antibodies.
That being said, Novavax contains the same antigen (spike protein) hence it's the same exact poison -- just a smaller (and known) amount of it.
Although well known, this is bad news. The mod- RNA platform is not suitable for use as a vaccine. It does not work and has significant side effects. Unfortunately, at the moment it looks like all vaccines will be switched to this platform. The classic ones (although they are not good either) as well as the new developments against all x germs and viruses that do not even exist yet. The reason for this is that mod-RNA technology is cheap. In fact, a vaccine can be produced in a very short time because the m-RNA is simply thrown together on a PC. Companies are saving millions in production. And now that the platform is approved, they don't even need to spend money on expensive clinical trials and studies. It's crazy.
Unlike the PCR amplification manufacturing method used in the trial, the one for mass inoculation was made using the amplification manufacturing method using Escherichia coli, so contamination with endotoxin(More toxic/unit than potassium cyanide), dsDNA, microRNA, etc. is severe.
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/gmo-spike-protein-carries-e-coli