because people are still testing all the time when they travel, attend gatherings, go into a hospital, etc. This is called "screening" and has been a truly massive source of false positives since the start of the pandemic b/c when you test someone with no symptoms the chance of a false positive skyrockets based on simple Bayesian logic a…
because people are still testing all the time when they travel, attend gatherings, go into a hospital, etc. This is called "screening" and has been a truly massive source of false positives since the start of the pandemic b/c when you test someone with no symptoms the chance of a false positive skyrockets based on simple Bayesian logic and the base rate fallacy. https://www.theguardian.com/theobserver/commentisfree/2021/apr/25/covid-false-positives-and-conditional-probabilities
Yeah it the Long Covid groups early on people were testing every week as positive as many as 8 times positive. So that really elevated the number of positive cases being counted because they had the at-home test kits.
Even IF the RT-PCR tests were useful for differentiation, the simple fact was they were using WAYYY too many test cycles in order to pump up already inflated numbers.
RT-PCR should be max 25 Ct (Cycle Threshold); however, they were using 40 Ct and higher in some areas which would make ANYTHING including a brick test "positive."
Lo and behold, the Ct was reduced back down to 25 Ct and less right around January 2021, so it would appear Xiden had "defeated the virus."
This is directly from the RT-PCR test inventor's mouth back in the 1990's.
The RT PCR tech also has a limit of the size of sequence it can work with, which from memory was about 900 long. We are told covid19 virus has a genome of 30k. So the PCR can only identify 3% of the virus. How do we know if the remaining 97% of the virus was there and it was this causing the symptoms?
It wouldn't matter what the cycles on the test were, the inventor of the test said you could not test for COVID or any other specific virus with a PCR test. The only thing a PCR test will tell you is that there is "some kind" of non-specific genetic material on the swab, that's all the PCR test was every designed to determine, non-specific genetic material?
I suspect that all the positive PCR test were actually common flu genetic material when the CDC reported for year 2021 only 2500 cases of flu down from millions each previous year for the past 50.
Not exactly. PCR is very accurate, it is an amplification process. You can detect a specific sequence. What he said is that you can't diagnose a disease with it. You can't tell if that person is recovered, if they are immune...those fragments aren't necessarily viable.
You can't say someone is immune or recoverd from something that you haven't even established exists in the first place. Well you can say it but just saying something is a misidrection like as performed in magic tricks. The pcr is just a prop used in the trick. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LkHePIahXEs
because people are still testing all the time when they travel, attend gatherings, go into a hospital, etc. This is called "screening" and has been a truly massive source of false positives since the start of the pandemic b/c when you test someone with no symptoms the chance of a false positive skyrockets based on simple Bayesian logic and the base rate fallacy. https://www.theguardian.com/theobserver/commentisfree/2021/apr/25/covid-false-positives-and-conditional-probabilities
It's worse than that.
They've been counting TESTS as CASES since 2020.
Keep in mind some retards are getting "tested" multiple times per week.
Yeah it the Long Covid groups early on people were testing every week as positive as many as 8 times positive. So that really elevated the number of positive cases being counted because they had the at-home test kits.
Yes, exactly, and tons of those tests/"cases" are just false positives, in fact the large majority.
Correct.
Even IF the RT-PCR tests were useful for differentiation, the simple fact was they were using WAYYY too many test cycles in order to pump up already inflated numbers.
RT-PCR should be max 25 Ct (Cycle Threshold); however, they were using 40 Ct and higher in some areas which would make ANYTHING including a brick test "positive."
Lo and behold, the Ct was reduced back down to 25 Ct and less right around January 2021, so it would appear Xiden had "defeated the virus."
This is directly from the RT-PCR test inventor's mouth back in the 1990's.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/wOSeTz57xrCF/
The RT PCR tech also has a limit of the size of sequence it can work with, which from memory was about 900 long. We are told covid19 virus has a genome of 30k. So the PCR can only identify 3% of the virus. How do we know if the remaining 97% of the virus was there and it was this causing the symptoms?
Or the 3% if the aerosol man made spike protein bioweapon that was part being transmitted?
It wouldn't matter what the cycles on the test were, the inventor of the test said you could not test for COVID or any other specific virus with a PCR test. The only thing a PCR test will tell you is that there is "some kind" of non-specific genetic material on the swab, that's all the PCR test was every designed to determine, non-specific genetic material?
I suspect that all the positive PCR test were actually common flu genetic material when the CDC reported for year 2021 only 2500 cases of flu down from millions each previous year for the past 50.
Not exactly. PCR is very accurate, it is an amplification process. You can detect a specific sequence. What he said is that you can't diagnose a disease with it. You can't tell if that person is recovered, if they are immune...those fragments aren't necessarily viable.
Not exactly!
You can't say someone is immune or recoverd from something that you haven't even established exists in the first place. Well you can say it but just saying something is a misidrection like as performed in magic tricks. The pcr is just a prop used in the trick. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LkHePIahXEs