11 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Coolguy 007's avatar

"Vaccines are effective at reducing the risk of severe outcome..."

Point is that these vaccines have NOT been authorized for THAT.

Applications made by manufacturers as well as authorizations given based on these applications state clearly these are FOR PREVENTION of infection. Now, correct me if I'm wrong but these are TWO different things.

An ethical and legally appropriate process would require

1) authorizations given so far revoked as failed and

2) asking manufacturers to apply for whatever these product indeed are capable of doing.

According to data shown these products are therapeutics only. Given in advance.

Expand full comment
Andreas's avatar

Absolutely, a prophylactic treatment NOT a vaccine. And thus something that cannot be mandated.

What is maddening is that the rules/laws don't seem to apply. New treatments approved? Yes, but the $hot EUA remains in place. Pandemic/Emergency over? Yes, but mandates for the $hot remain. Trial data faked/manipulated? You bet, but we won't let that slow this train down! Product ineffective and actually dangerous? Conclusively proven but written out of history like it was 1984.

These Clot Shots passed the most liberal interpretations for a stopping condition back in early 2021. Every day since they have been taking lives - and will continue to at an increasing rate for decades. The scale of this crime almost boggles the mind. A reasonable person recoils from even considering the possibility it was deliberate. But if it wasn't then it would have been stopped.

We're in a world ruled by psychopaths, and in the past 2 years they have been showing us their true selves. Let us never forget amid all the distractions of life.

Expand full comment
Bandit's avatar

Many of your, so called, psychopaths, are really probably sociopaths.

Expand full comment
Zade's avatar

There's absolutely no difference in meaning between "sociopath" and "psychopath".

Expand full comment
Bandit's avatar

Ugh! Wrong again! Thanks for playing!

Expand full comment
Steghorn21's avatar

Does it matter whether the person screwing you is a psychopath or a sociopath? The pain is the same.

Expand full comment
Mos51's avatar

Just throwing this definition out there, then carefully backing away from this debate: Some experts see sociopaths as “hot-headed.” They act without thinking how others will be affected. Psychopaths are more “cold-hearted” and calculating. They carefully plot their moves, and use aggression in a planned-out way to get what they want.

Expand full comment
Rick's avatar

"According to data shown, these products are therapeutics only." What about the death and injury data? Plenty of data there to indicate something so absolutely contrary to the basic Hippocratic Oath (First, Do No Harm) that there is clearly an agenda to kill and harm behind it all.

Expand full comment
Simon Dawes's avatar

Coolguy 007 hits the nail right on the head.

Expand full comment
Pj's avatar

The problem is there’s nobody to police this. You’re right but every gov’t agency is tied in. And if someone doesn’t agree with it they have to resign, not stand in the way. There’s no accountability and nobody to make anyone accountable. It’s why the data doesn’t matter. They know it’s horrific. They’re not stupid, just greedy. And it’s a train that nobody but the president could stop. And if he remotely tried I bet we’d see an assassination. It’s that big at this point. Logic, Law, common sense and morals are off the table.

Expand full comment