"Evidence-based reality." Never heard of it? You should. It's being tossed about by academic, government, corporate and LEO leaders as an in-house recognized term-of-art. From the Aspen Institute's Commission on Information Disorder, under their mission:
"Evidence-based reality." Never heard of it? You should. It's being tossed about by academic, government, corporate and LEO leaders as an in-house recognized term-of-art. From the Aspen Institute's Commission on Information Disorder, under their mission:
"How government, private industry, and civil society can work together in the short term to help protect underrepresented groups, and engage disaffected populations who have lost faith in evidence-based reality"
Make sure you "Meet the Commissioners." Some very notable ones:
(Dept of Homeland Security's safest, most secure election ever ignominy Chris Krebs and Alex Stamos, Katie Couric, Prince Harry, noted leftist propagandists Kate Starbird and Yasmin Green, Fox News' Kathryn Murdoch, NV AG Aaron Ford, TX Cong. Will Hurd, among others.)
Perhaps a regime might not go so far as to call revolutionary truth-tellers dangerous fascists or domestic terrorists. They might turn to another favorite of totalitarians, deeming those who oppose them mentally ill. Insane. Criminally insane if they are too exuberant in their truth-telling and resist being silenced. Dissociated from "evidence-based reality."
This is the precursor to local Behavioral Health Departments declaring citizens, "insane." Totalitarian regimes go-to's for dissidents. Like in the Third Reich. Where the mentally ill were institutionalized, then sterilized and even "euthanized" along with other disabled and handicapped the Nazi regime had no use for. For their own good, terminating the pitiful existence of the feeble-minded. The poor imbeciles. And dangerous antisocials.
The Third Reich was simply following the law in the United States when it committed crimes against humanity. Buck vs. Bell, 9-1 SCOTUS decision, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes writing for the majority, "Three generations of imbeciles is enough." (Eight generations now?) Still the law in the US today, never overturned, mildly tweaked in 1951, reaffirmed in 2001. Eugenics law. It governs the bioethics of public health mandates, including the transhuman agenda, gender-affirming surgery, biotechnology, injectible nanotech.
Bioethics as legitimized and practiced under Buck vs. Bell is how the "sophisticates" of the Brahmin class justify their "edicts for thee, but not for me." And if you dissent you're either a "stochastic terrorist" or dissociated from "evidence-based reality" and mentally ill, insane. Genetically undesirable for future generations. The disobedient and the imbeciles eliminated from the gene pool. By sterilizing "vaccines" and chemical castrations. And other horrors yet to be unleashed. We've seen this story before, now haven't we?
Useless Eaters: Disability as Genocidal Marker in Nazi Germany
Catholic Culture, 2002
(Important to note, disabilities included those deemed insane, dissociated from reality, who were often actually just political dissidents. Reading this will bring tears to eyes. And know it included people who've done nothing worse than have ideas like Igor's mine and others contributing on this post.)
"The methods used for mass extermination in the Nazi death camps originated and were perfected in earlier use against people with physical, emotional, and intellectual disabilities. This article describes the historical context of attitudes toward people with disabilities in Germany and how this context produced mass murder of people with disabilities prior to and during the early years of World War II. Several key marker variables, the manipulation of which allowed a highly sophisticated Western society to officially sanction the murder of people with disabilities, are examined. Important implications must continually be drawn from these sad events as we work with people with disabilities at the dawn of a new century."
Harari thinks we are all useless. He says machines can replace nearly everyone.
Those who agree to obey and get experimented on will be rewarded with uppers and video games. Not much reward for obedience in this cruel System. They torture you no matter what. It's sure to collapse. But can we survive?
Don't be too hasty to cast aspersions on the Germans. They got their Eugenicist ideas from the USA and Britain.
I worked archiving old documentation from a British asylum. What I saw was deliberate torture and cruelty meted out to the inmates, some of whom were just single mothers or guys who had been 'angry at work'. Early death was inevitable among those given freezing baths for hours on end and lobotomies which amounted to waggling a knife around in brains.
Correct. The defendants at Nuremberg, on trial for crimes against humanity for their eugenics programs and human experiments raised the US SCOTUS Buck v. Bell decision in defense of their actions. "Three generations of imbeciles is enough," enshrined in US law, never overturned, even upheld as recently as 2001. They had us worried about Roe v. Wade for a half-century while Buck v. Bell has become stare decisis for a full century. Quietly lurking as standing US jurisprudence. For times like these?
The US had a great many powerful industrialists and politicians, globalists in the 1930's-1940's who who supported fascism. And saw Hitler's transformations in Germany as something to be inspired by. None as important to the history of our nation that's ensued than Prescott Bush. Father of George HW Bush, grandfather of George W Bush. Also known as Hitler's banker. Made sure the German war machine could pay its bills. While it killed US soldiers and gassed prisoners in death camps. Checks cleared through Bush's bank, Switzerland as pass-through bankers.
How Bush's grandfather helped Hitler's rise to power
"Some of the primary and more famous Americans and companies that were involved with the fascist regimes of Europe are: William Randolph Hearst, Joseph Kennedy (JFK's father), Charles Lindbergh, John Rockefeller, Andrew Mellon (head of Alcoa, banker, and Secretary of Treasury), DuPont, General Motors, Standard Oil (now Exxon), Ford, ITT, Allen Dulles (later head of the CIA), Prescott Bush, National City Bank, and General Electric."
"The following is excerpted from a report printed by the United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary in 1974:
The activities of General Motors, Ford and Chrysler prior to and during World War II...are instructive. At that time, these three firms dominated motor vehicle production in both the United States and Germany. Due to its mass production capabilities, automobile manufacturing is one of the most crucial industries with respect to national defense. As a result, these firms retained the economic and political power to affect the shape of governmental relations both within and between these nations in a manner which maximized corporate global profits. In short, they were private governments unaccountable to the citizens of any country yet possessing tremendous influence over the course of war and peace in the world. The substantial contribution of these firms to the American war effort in terms of tanks, aircraft components, and other military equipment is widely acknowledged. Less well known are the simultaneous contributions of their foreign subsidiaries to the Axis Powers. In sum, they maximized profits by supplying both sides with the materiel needed to conduct the war."
"In 1940 Graeme K. Howard, Vice President of General Motors, published America and a New World Order, in which he advised that America give full cooperation to the Nazi regime. In his book he blames FDR for causing the war in Europe and goes on to say that the fascists should be supported as the better alternative to the spread of Communism."
"Important information about the ties between American businessmen and the fascist powers of Europe was communicated to FDR by the American Ambassador to Germany during the 1930s, William E. Dodd. His writings on the matter are of critical importance. He wrote about connections between Hearst and the Nazis as well as Hearst and the Italians, in addition to Nazi connections with other wealthy Americans.
"A clique of U.S. industrialists is hell-bent to bring a fascist state to supplant our democratic government and is working closely with the fascist regime in Germany and Italy. I have had plenty of opportunity in my post in Berlin to witness how close some of our American ruling families are to the Nazi regime. . . . "
"Certain American industrialists had a great deal to do with bringing fascist regimes into being in both Germany and Italy. They extended aid to help Fascism occupy the seat of power, and they are helping to keep it there."
- William E. Dodd, U.S. Ambassador to Germany, 1937
This is the only internet library of the writings of William E. Dodd:
Might explain the Bush/Cheney/Big Multinational hatred of constitutional liberty loving Patriots who've rallied under the MAGA flag. As imperfect its leader is. They truly do hate us. Bitter clingers. Deplorables. Just as much as the Clinton's, Obama's and Biden's do.
And I have read much of that history, packaged a little differently, And so it is. And even that history preceded by the same types of struggles over how to govern man best that Plato, Aristotle and Socrates contemplated in antiquity. It was a nice illusion, modern times and comforts while it lasted, huh?
Your article about the inaccurate meme of wolf packs resonated with me. I had a fruit farm in Spain years ago and I had 3 dogs, a small cat, a gaggle of chickens, a cockerel and a horse. When I would go off my property to collect firewood they would all come with me to forage while I worked.
Rasta, the wolf-like alpha Groenendahl was always in front, scouting. Then I would follow with my chickens hitching a lift on the wheelbarrow. Soldato, the horse would like to walk beside me and Ben, the Staffordshire Bull Terrier would always bring up the rear. The cat would dart forwards and backwards and sometimes hide in the undergrowth - always wary.
She was the leader of our pack. The dogs obeyed her every alert and were always watching her for signals.....
When I saw that meme ages ago on Twitter I was confused by it. How could they have got it so wrong? Now that I have seen your analysis and realisation that this misinformation was actually a psyop preparing us to believe that leaders serve best from the rear of the pack..... I am relieved of that nagging confusion!
Glad it resonated with you. And I enjoyed the story you shared!
The psyop wasn't just to prepare us to believe that leaders serve best from the rear. It was to immobilize the pack, make it easier to take control of. By slowing the entire pack and making it take on the characteristics of its weakest member it becomes easy prey. It's meant to ban/discourage excellence, strength, advancement. Nature doesn't do that. Either by Intelligent Design/God or Darwinism. No species survives being led by the weak; all perish. The meme was to make us weak, prey, the strongest fighters in no position to protect the pack by setting a faster pace, seeing threats ahead and diverting around them. Which sometimes meant the oldest and weakest pack member might perish being left behind. But the pack lives. Strong.
Totalitarian predators are usually weak people themselves. They must use deceit and sorcery to wield power. If they were strong the people would follow them willingly without needing to be deceived and coerced. Their plans are connivances, they aren't strong enough to take on the strong they seek to control head-to-head. They want the strongest people out of position, deceived into taking weak postures. And when weak people become the most powerful, the leaders, they must resort to an iron grip on those they rule. Totalitarianism. Because they know they aren't strong, the people know they aren't strong, and only psychological manipulation and brute force allows them to maintain their power over stronger people than they.
No. I've read history. Different sides of the same coin. Individual liberty, western liberal capitalism their mutual enemy. Played out today in the US as Rino's and D's, against MAGA. All around the world.
But, but, Fascists and Communists hate each other. Antifascists hate Nazi's and Fascists, Fascists hate Marxists, commies, right? Hitler and Stalin were enemies, of course. But not ideological enemies to the degree it resulted in war between the two. Egos and greed did that. Not ideologies. As evidenced by the Hitler-Stalin Pact and Secret Protocols. The ideologies actually had more in common than they did with western liberal democratic capitalism. From the Hitler-Stalin Pact Discussion:
"Both considered the democratic and capitalist states as their respective enemies."
"They had a very extensive exchange of views that included the expression of a common opposition to the capitalist democracies. It was now openly stated that a rapprochement between the two countries corresponded with the vital interests of both."
"Economically speaking both states were closer structurally than they were to the capitalist countries.
Ribbentrop noted in particular that both countries were, in fact, hostile to "capitalistic western democracies". Germany had economic four year plans. The Soviet Union had five year plans. Both maintained direct party and state control over the economic direction of their respective states. Germany still had private enterprise but the Nazi policy of Gleichschaltung ensured the primacy of the state in economic matters."
"Don't you think that we have to pay a little more attention to public opinion in our countries? For many years now we have been pouring buckets of slop over each other's heads and our propaganda boys could never do enough in that direction; and now all of a sudden are we to make our peoples believe that all is forgotten and forgiven? Things don 't work so fast. Public opinion in our country, and probably in Germany too, will have to be prepared slowly for the change in our relations this treaty is to bring about, and it will have ta be made familiar with it."
"Because of the results of the war and the "Manhattan Project", the United States took over the position held by Gerrnany."
The Hitler Stalin Pact - Discussion of the Non-Aggression Treat and the Secret Protocols
Funny then that Germany had an economic miracle "It was paradise" while the bankster-west suffered through the worst depression in its history.
And no, it wasn't due to military spending.
You're fixated on systemic similarities while ignoring who has ownership and management of the operation. That's the historic difference, the dimension you're not supposed to see.
Mercola has an interesting article of the plan being used to lie so big that people question themselves leading to action by the liars to take control. It’s fascinating. But chilling.
Hmmm. On the one hand, it's probably needed for some of these people. On the other hand, what do these authorities decide is mental illness? Those who've lost touch with "evidence-based reality" like election deniers, vax deniers, mask deniers, preferred pronoun deniers? Is this power in their hands in these times trustworthy?
"Evidence-based reality." Never heard of it? You should. It's being tossed about by academic, government, corporate and LEO leaders as an in-house recognized term-of-art. From the Aspen Institute's Commission on Information Disorder, under their mission:
www.aspeninstitute.org/programs/commission-on-information-disorder/
"How government, private industry, and civil society can work together in the short term to help protect underrepresented groups, and engage disaffected populations who have lost faith in evidence-based reality"
Make sure you "Meet the Commissioners." Some very notable ones:
www.aspeninstitute.org/programs/commission-on-information-disorder/meet-the-commissioners/
(Dept of Homeland Security's safest, most secure election ever ignominy Chris Krebs and Alex Stamos, Katie Couric, Prince Harry, noted leftist propagandists Kate Starbird and Yasmin Green, Fox News' Kathryn Murdoch, NV AG Aaron Ford, TX Cong. Will Hurd, among others.)
Perhaps a regime might not go so far as to call revolutionary truth-tellers dangerous fascists or domestic terrorists. They might turn to another favorite of totalitarians, deeming those who oppose them mentally ill. Insane. Criminally insane if they are too exuberant in their truth-telling and resist being silenced. Dissociated from "evidence-based reality."
This is the precursor to local Behavioral Health Departments declaring citizens, "insane." Totalitarian regimes go-to's for dissidents. Like in the Third Reich. Where the mentally ill were institutionalized, then sterilized and even "euthanized" along with other disabled and handicapped the Nazi regime had no use for. For their own good, terminating the pitiful existence of the feeble-minded. The poor imbeciles. And dangerous antisocials.
The Third Reich was simply following the law in the United States when it committed crimes against humanity. Buck vs. Bell, 9-1 SCOTUS decision, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes writing for the majority, "Three generations of imbeciles is enough." (Eight generations now?) Still the law in the US today, never overturned, mildly tweaked in 1951, reaffirmed in 2001. Eugenics law. It governs the bioethics of public health mandates, including the transhuman agenda, gender-affirming surgery, biotechnology, injectible nanotech.
bioedge.org/enhancement/harvards-dark-past-as-the-brain-trust-of-american-eugenics/
Bioethics as legitimized and practiced under Buck vs. Bell is how the "sophisticates" of the Brahmin class justify their "edicts for thee, but not for me." And if you dissent you're either a "stochastic terrorist" or dissociated from "evidence-based reality" and mentally ill, insane. Genetically undesirable for future generations. The disobedient and the imbeciles eliminated from the gene pool. By sterilizing "vaccines" and chemical castrations. And other horrors yet to be unleashed. We've seen this story before, now haven't we?
Useless Eaters: Disability as Genocidal Marker in Nazi Germany
Catholic Culture, 2002
(Important to note, disabilities included those deemed insane, dissociated from reality, who were often actually just political dissidents. Reading this will bring tears to eyes. And know it included people who've done nothing worse than have ideas like Igor's mine and others contributing on this post.)
"The methods used for mass extermination in the Nazi death camps originated and were perfected in earlier use against people with physical, emotional, and intellectual disabilities. This article describes the historical context of attitudes toward people with disabilities in Germany and how this context produced mass murder of people with disabilities prior to and during the early years of World War II. Several key marker variables, the manipulation of which allowed a highly sophisticated Western society to officially sanction the murder of people with disabilities, are examined. Important implications must continually be drawn from these sad events as we work with people with disabilities at the dawn of a new century."
https://www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/view.cfm?recnum=7019
Harari thinks we are all useless. He says machines can replace nearly everyone.
Those who agree to obey and get experimented on will be rewarded with uppers and video games. Not much reward for obedience in this cruel System. They torture you no matter what. It's sure to collapse. But can we survive?
Harari is the useless one.
Don't be too hasty to cast aspersions on the Germans. They got their Eugenicist ideas from the USA and Britain.
I worked archiving old documentation from a British asylum. What I saw was deliberate torture and cruelty meted out to the inmates, some of whom were just single mothers or guys who had been 'angry at work'. Early death was inevitable among those given freezing baths for hours on end and lobotomies which amounted to waggling a knife around in brains.
Correct. The defendants at Nuremberg, on trial for crimes against humanity for their eugenics programs and human experiments raised the US SCOTUS Buck v. Bell decision in defense of their actions. "Three generations of imbeciles is enough," enshrined in US law, never overturned, even upheld as recently as 2001. They had us worried about Roe v. Wade for a half-century while Buck v. Bell has become stare decisis for a full century. Quietly lurking as standing US jurisprudence. For times like these?
The US had a great many powerful industrialists and politicians, globalists in the 1930's-1940's who who supported fascism. And saw Hitler's transformations in Germany as something to be inspired by. None as important to the history of our nation that's ensued than Prescott Bush. Father of George HW Bush, grandfather of George W Bush. Also known as Hitler's banker. Made sure the German war machine could pay its bills. While it killed US soldiers and gassed prisoners in death camps. Checks cleared through Bush's bank, Switzerland as pass-through bankers.
How Bush's grandfather helped Hitler's rise to power
The Guardian, September 5, 2004
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/sep/25/usa.secondworldwar
Below excerpted from "American Supporters of the European Fascists":
http://www.rationalrevolution.net/war/american_supporters_of_the_europ.htm
"Some of the primary and more famous Americans and companies that were involved with the fascist regimes of Europe are: William Randolph Hearst, Joseph Kennedy (JFK's father), Charles Lindbergh, John Rockefeller, Andrew Mellon (head of Alcoa, banker, and Secretary of Treasury), DuPont, General Motors, Standard Oil (now Exxon), Ford, ITT, Allen Dulles (later head of the CIA), Prescott Bush, National City Bank, and General Electric."
"The following is excerpted from a report printed by the United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary in 1974:
The activities of General Motors, Ford and Chrysler prior to and during World War II...are instructive. At that time, these three firms dominated motor vehicle production in both the United States and Germany. Due to its mass production capabilities, automobile manufacturing is one of the most crucial industries with respect to national defense. As a result, these firms retained the economic and political power to affect the shape of governmental relations both within and between these nations in a manner which maximized corporate global profits. In short, they were private governments unaccountable to the citizens of any country yet possessing tremendous influence over the course of war and peace in the world. The substantial contribution of these firms to the American war effort in terms of tanks, aircraft components, and other military equipment is widely acknowledged. Less well known are the simultaneous contributions of their foreign subsidiaries to the Axis Powers. In sum, they maximized profits by supplying both sides with the materiel needed to conduct the war."
"In 1940 Graeme K. Howard, Vice President of General Motors, published America and a New World Order, in which he advised that America give full cooperation to the Nazi regime. In his book he blames FDR for causing the war in Europe and goes on to say that the fascists should be supported as the better alternative to the spread of Communism."
"Important information about the ties between American businessmen and the fascist powers of Europe was communicated to FDR by the American Ambassador to Germany during the 1930s, William E. Dodd. His writings on the matter are of critical importance. He wrote about connections between Hearst and the Nazis as well as Hearst and the Italians, in addition to Nazi connections with other wealthy Americans.
"A clique of U.S. industrialists is hell-bent to bring a fascist state to supplant our democratic government and is working closely with the fascist regime in Germany and Italy. I have had plenty of opportunity in my post in Berlin to witness how close some of our American ruling families are to the Nazi regime. . . . "
"Certain American industrialists had a great deal to do with bringing fascist regimes into being in both Germany and Italy. They extended aid to help Fascism occupy the seat of power, and they are helping to keep it there."
- William E. Dodd, U.S. Ambassador to Germany, 1937
This is the only internet library of the writings of William E. Dodd:
http://www.fdrlibrary.marist.edu/psf/box32/folt299.html"
A Good Journalist Understands That Fascism Can Happen Anywhere, Anytime
Literary Hub, April 3, 2020
https://lithub.com/a-good-journalist-understands-that-fascism-can-happen-anywhere-anytime/
Might explain the Bush/Cheney/Big Multinational hatred of constitutional liberty loving Patriots who've rallied under the MAGA flag. As imperfect its leader is. They truly do hate us. Bitter clingers. Deplorables. Just as much as the Clinton's, Obama's and Biden's do.
I just subscribed to your account and found this.... I think it is appropriate to be shared on Igor's post:
https://freedomfox.substack.com/p/foxes-know-wolves
Yes, I am aware of that history.
The globalists have used the USA quite relentlessly ever since the Declaration of Independence. https://francesleader.substack.com/p/what-does-the-rule-of-law-mean
And I have read much of that history, packaged a little differently, And so it is. And even that history preceded by the same types of struggles over how to govern man best that Plato, Aristotle and Socrates contemplated in antiquity. It was a nice illusion, modern times and comforts while it lasted, huh?
Your article about the inaccurate meme of wolf packs resonated with me. I had a fruit farm in Spain years ago and I had 3 dogs, a small cat, a gaggle of chickens, a cockerel and a horse. When I would go off my property to collect firewood they would all come with me to forage while I worked.
Rasta, the wolf-like alpha Groenendahl was always in front, scouting. Then I would follow with my chickens hitching a lift on the wheelbarrow. Soldato, the horse would like to walk beside me and Ben, the Staffordshire Bull Terrier would always bring up the rear. The cat would dart forwards and backwards and sometimes hide in the undergrowth - always wary.
She was the leader of our pack. The dogs obeyed her every alert and were always watching her for signals.....
When I saw that meme ages ago on Twitter I was confused by it. How could they have got it so wrong? Now that I have seen your analysis and realisation that this misinformation was actually a psyop preparing us to believe that leaders serve best from the rear of the pack..... I am relieved of that nagging confusion!
Glad it resonated with you. And I enjoyed the story you shared!
The psyop wasn't just to prepare us to believe that leaders serve best from the rear. It was to immobilize the pack, make it easier to take control of. By slowing the entire pack and making it take on the characteristics of its weakest member it becomes easy prey. It's meant to ban/discourage excellence, strength, advancement. Nature doesn't do that. Either by Intelligent Design/God or Darwinism. No species survives being led by the weak; all perish. The meme was to make us weak, prey, the strongest fighters in no position to protect the pack by setting a faster pace, seeing threats ahead and diverting around them. Which sometimes meant the oldest and weakest pack member might perish being left behind. But the pack lives. Strong.
Totalitarian predators are usually weak people themselves. They must use deceit and sorcery to wield power. If they were strong the people would follow them willingly without needing to be deceived and coerced. Their plans are connivances, they aren't strong enough to take on the strong they seek to control head-to-head. They want the strongest people out of position, deceived into taking weak postures. And when weak people become the most powerful, the leaders, they must resort to an iron grip on those they rule. Totalitarianism. Because they know they aren't strong, the people know they aren't strong, and only psychological manipulation and brute force allows them to maintain their power over stronger people than they.
Globalists are anti-fascists. Fascists are anti-globalist.
Are you so confused, or are you trying to confuse?
The fascists in Ukraine are working for the globalists. Hadn't you noticed? That is why they are constantly asking for more funds.
They're clown-fascists. Controlled opposition. As you say, exactly because they're funded, led, organized by the kiev khazars.
To resolve the confusion, just call it "liberal-fascism": Rule by a corporatist oligarchy, behind a false front of liberal democracy.
No. I've read history. Different sides of the same coin. Individual liberty, western liberal capitalism their mutual enemy. Played out today in the US as Rino's and D's, against MAGA. All around the world.
But, but, Fascists and Communists hate each other. Antifascists hate Nazi's and Fascists, Fascists hate Marxists, commies, right? Hitler and Stalin were enemies, of course. But not ideological enemies to the degree it resulted in war between the two. Egos and greed did that. Not ideologies. As evidenced by the Hitler-Stalin Pact and Secret Protocols. The ideologies actually had more in common than they did with western liberal democratic capitalism. From the Hitler-Stalin Pact Discussion:
"Both considered the democratic and capitalist states as their respective enemies."
"They had a very extensive exchange of views that included the expression of a common opposition to the capitalist democracies. It was now openly stated that a rapprochement between the two countries corresponded with the vital interests of both."
"Economically speaking both states were closer structurally than they were to the capitalist countries.
Ribbentrop noted in particular that both countries were, in fact, hostile to "capitalistic western democracies". Germany had economic four year plans. The Soviet Union had five year plans. Both maintained direct party and state control over the economic direction of their respective states. Germany still had private enterprise but the Nazi policy of Gleichschaltung ensured the primacy of the state in economic matters."
"Don't you think that we have to pay a little more attention to public opinion in our countries? For many years now we have been pouring buckets of slop over each other's heads and our propaganda boys could never do enough in that direction; and now all of a sudden are we to make our peoples believe that all is forgotten and forgiven? Things don 't work so fast. Public opinion in our country, and probably in Germany too, will have to be prepared slowly for the change in our relations this treaty is to bring about, and it will have ta be made familiar with it."
"Because of the results of the war and the "Manhattan Project", the United States took over the position held by Gerrnany."
The Hitler Stalin Pact - Discussion of the Non-Aggression Treat and the Secret Protocols
McGill University, 1992
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234008336_The_Hitler-Stalin_pact_discussion_of_the_Non-Aggression_Treaty_and_the_secret_protocols
Funny then that Germany had an economic miracle "It was paradise" while the bankster-west suffered through the worst depression in its history.
And no, it wasn't due to military spending.
You're fixated on systemic similarities while ignoring who has ownership and management of the operation. That's the historic difference, the dimension you're not supposed to see.
Did you write that up as a book?
Mercola has an interesting article of the plan being used to lie so big that people question themselves leading to action by the liars to take control. It’s fascinating. But chilling.
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2022/11/22/pfizer-art-of-the-big-lie.aspx?ui=74b40b7b95f01026bb3c5d06bc18a0262ff749c0d9a44f3b27316d934120a56e&sd=20210506&cid_source=dnl&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art1HL&cid=20221122&cid=DM1291695&bid=1651035390.
Thank you!
"War Against The Weak", by Edwin Black.
Hmmm. On the one hand, it's probably needed for some of these people. On the other hand, what do these authorities decide is mental illness? Those who've lost touch with "evidence-based reality" like election deniers, vax deniers, mask deniers, preferred pronoun deniers? Is this power in their hands in these times trustworthy?
https://www.nyc.gov/office-of-the-mayor/news/870-22/mayor-adams-plan-provide-care-individuals-suffering-untreated-severe-mental#/0
Yes
Meanwhile those who believe them grow more and more insane.
Yep, I talk about the Aspen Institute gimmick in the article I posted above. And also about a potential psychiatric diagnosis.