Why would the NYT be telling the truth now? That makes no sense to me. The only reason they would is that this is the planned next step all along, when deaths and injuries were too obvious to cover up. Point to China, to a few bad eggs in the US. Wuhan vs. zoonotic is a false dichotomy we were presented from the start.
Why would the NYT be telling the truth now? That makes no sense to me. The only reason they would is that this is the planned next step all along, when deaths and injuries were too obvious to cover up. Point to China, to a few bad eggs in the US. Wuhan vs. zoonotic is a false dichotomy we were presented from the start.
Right ! The Sunday Times dished out a "limited hangout" because that’s what they do : a little bit of truth, a lot of lies and all decoy. They give them awards for that. In light of the real horrors, mandating the kill shot, jabbing babies and pregnant moms, the global lockdowns, the deliberate economic and social destruction, maybe the death of civilization ... this d’effective story is really worse than a nothing-burger, but watch ! Our neighbors will be munching on it with profound satisfaction tomorrow, claiming they knew it all the time.
Could be just planned demoralizing. Here idiot believe the unbelievable, 36 months later...ooh half your family is dead from the vaccine, not the virus and the virus was planned. How you like that?!
Except that they're presenting a target for your anger: China, nasty tyrannical China. China who keeps putting their territory right next to NATO war drills, as Caitlin Johnstone says. And they're goading us to turn Taiwan into the next Ukraine.
An easy mistake to make I suppose. It's all the same propaganda, though.. I suppose the UK Times gets theirs from MI5 or MI6 and not directly from Langley or whoever it is that directs this laughable propaganda.
David Martin gave an articulate presentation to the European Parliament at the International C0vld summit in May describing the U S mliltarey work since 1965 with c0r0n@viruses as weap0ns. It's on Rumble in various places.
So for The Times to point all the blame at Chln@ is very convenient and probably wrong.
When I heard about nicotine blocking covid I thought about the "Mysterious Lung Disorder" from back in 2019, which didn't start in the summer, that's just when if finally got noticed. Likely released earlier in the year the 6 months before summer and it just got bad in summer and peaked in September. I was paying attention to that at the time, because I am a vaper and vaped regardless, ... with zero issues. lol
November 2019 is when I decided I should stock up because I sensed a LOT of vaping legislation/restrictions coming in the near future. Better safe then sorry, but that's why I have a vast collection of hardware now and a gallon of nicotine concentrate. They used to say "Vape On" in the vaping community, I say "Vape Regardless !!"
Yeah, I haven't had any covid symptoms either, ..... I'm positive the nicotine had nothing to do with it, that's just conspiracy theory. lol
I wonder what they tried before using the Lipid nano-particle for the vaccine??
I think you'd like my first article above. It talks about Bryan Ardis on snake venom, which nicotine is a cure for. They also were trying to restrict real nicotine and replace it with all synthetic. Malone is neck-deep in all of this, from getting contracts for DoD e-cig prototypes for testing. Why?
Oh, you can bet on me reviewing all the info. Making my way through the first video now. Got the two substack articles pasted into my new "Vaping & Covid" file. Until now, it was just a thought I had, so no file yet.
The Malone connection is intensely interesting and is more than enough to expand on my initial picture of the situation.
I don't think covid was a coverup of the 2019 vaping lung issue. I think it was more of a dry run test prior to the main release. They needed to see for sure what it would do to humans, they needed to know if it was strong enough. to meet their needs.
Yay, happy to have a cohort in conspiracy research! You'll want to be putting Mark's 2-hr podcast in that shiny new file too. He really turns your (and my) random thought into an issue of importance. You'll really like the interview between Malone and Andrew Huff where Huff talks about being offered a 'boatload of money' to go to Juul, the vaping company. Without knowing this, Mark had sent him data on a sudden spike in vaping ER visits and he responded with "Controlled opposition! Blocked!" Mark happened to be pouring cement when he got that note and wondered, "Where's the money if I'm CO?"
No, Covid was certainly not a coverup of the vaping. But was the vaping the vector for spreading the biologiical? chemical? weapon? Was it connected to cobra venom, as Ardis researches? The vaccines are the bullet but they needed a trigger.
Entered the first video url into the file first thing, while I was watching it. Malone in Vaping is something different and interesting. The two substacks also had quite a few links to follow, so it will be a fun ride to the end of the tentacles, picking up more links to pertinent info in comments sections along the way. Or, ... same as usual that I do for all the other files. lol
I read Malone's Substack and have read his book. I'm not familiar with your present claims, but I do know for a fact that Malone has never hidden his past (present?) connections or work with DTRA and perhaps other agencies. People are of course free to doubt his sincerity, but I say give the man credit for (apparently) not hiding much.
After this comment, I posted this episode on him that also links the 12 others that I've done at the end: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/malones-million-dollar-pity-party. It's 90% direct quotes from Malone or articles on him that he linked. They show that he had $20.7M to test HCQ as a repurposed drug, which was already the standard of care for NY patients. Somehow, in his fight over credit for famotidine, which had no data at all to back it up, HCQ ends up being taken out of use as ineffective and unsafe. From the whistleblower, who was the Director of BARDA at the time, this was a money-making grab of cronyism.
You're not alone. There are statistical results from Europe that nicotine smokers were not getting sick. I think I link some in my articles. Oh look! Martha and Guido are all over the question! Excellent, I'll copy these into my own brand new folder, aka Substack draft, for a future episode. Thanks!
— BMJ comment, Jan 2020, “Nicotine and COVID-19,” concluding “the evidence suggests that nicotine or other nicotinic agonists could have beneficial effects against severe COVID-19.”
— Jerusalem Post, June 2020, “Israeli study points to nicotine as a potential therapeutic for COVID-19.”
— Medical News, July 2020, “Involvement of nicotine receptors in COVID-19” (nicotine interferes with spike protein).
— Cureus Journal, October 2020, “Does Nicotine Prevent Cytokine Storms in COVID-19?” (Nicotine may act as an anti-inflammatory that prevents cytokine storms caused by spike protein).
— American Council on Health and Science, June 2020, “Does Smoking Prevent COVID-19? We Don’t Know, But Some Journalists Don’t Want To Find Out.”
— Journal of Biophysics, February 2021, “A potential interaction between the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and nicotinic acetylcholine receptors” (nicotine interferes with spike protein).
— GLP, October 2021, “Smokers are less likely to get COVID: French researchers explore whether nicotine might prevent transmission.”
— Medical Hypotheses, January 2022, “Nicotinic receptors as SARS-CoV-2 spike co-receptors?” (nicotine interferes with spike protein).
Why would the NYT be telling the truth now? That makes no sense to me. The only reason they would is that this is the planned next step all along, when deaths and injuries were too obvious to cover up. Point to China, to a few bad eggs in the US. Wuhan vs. zoonotic is a false dichotomy we were presented from the start.
Right ! The Sunday Times dished out a "limited hangout" because that’s what they do : a little bit of truth, a lot of lies and all decoy. They give them awards for that. In light of the real horrors, mandating the kill shot, jabbing babies and pregnant moms, the global lockdowns, the deliberate economic and social destruction, maybe the death of civilization ... this d’effective story is really worse than a nothing-burger, but watch ! Our neighbors will be munching on it with profound satisfaction tomorrow, claiming they knew it all the time.
I'd be okay with the death of civilization if it meant bringing humanity back ;-)
Very funny. Picturing my neighbors now munching down their nothing-burgers. A little egg on their faces, but who remembers anything past breakfast?
And you can wipe off the egg and make omlettes.
Lying and smugness - Sounds like a recipe for physical debate. lol
This is the Times of London, not the NYT.
Could be just planned demoralizing. Here idiot believe the unbelievable, 36 months later...ooh half your family is dead from the vaccine, not the virus and the virus was planned. How you like that?!
Except that they're presenting a target for your anger: China, nasty tyrannical China. China who keeps putting their territory right next to NATO war drills, as Caitlin Johnstone says. And they're goading us to turn Taiwan into the next Ukraine.
This is the UK Times. I had the same thoughts
An easy mistake to make I suppose. It's all the same propaganda, though.. I suppose the UK Times gets theirs from MI5 or MI6 and not directly from Langley or whoever it is that directs this laughable propaganda.
Agree. Why now? This isn't new news.
David Martin gave an articulate presentation to the European Parliament at the International C0vld summit in May describing the U S mliltarey work since 1965 with c0r0n@viruses as weap0ns. It's on Rumble in various places.
So for The Times to point all the blame at Chln@ is very convenient and probably wrong.
But who's the perpetrator? I've just been listening to Mark Kulacz on Housatonic Live from an old episode on 2019 'strange flu-like' symptoms from vaping: https://odysee.com/@Housatonic:0/469-ep-169-1:2. It's really astonishing how many of the players are involved in these shadowy DTRA e-cig contracts, including Malone and Andrew Huff. I talked about it in a couple of episodes awhile back: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/vaping-and-snake-venom and https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/what-a-smoke-and-wombat-holes.
I'm not closing the book on this yet.
When I heard about nicotine blocking covid I thought about the "Mysterious Lung Disorder" from back in 2019, which didn't start in the summer, that's just when if finally got noticed. Likely released earlier in the year the 6 months before summer and it just got bad in summer and peaked in September. I was paying attention to that at the time, because I am a vaper and vaped regardless, ... with zero issues. lol
November 2019 is when I decided I should stock up because I sensed a LOT of vaping legislation/restrictions coming in the near future. Better safe then sorry, but that's why I have a vast collection of hardware now and a gallon of nicotine concentrate. They used to say "Vape On" in the vaping community, I say "Vape Regardless !!"
Yeah, I haven't had any covid symptoms either, ..... I'm positive the nicotine had nothing to do with it, that's just conspiracy theory. lol
I wonder what they tried before using the Lipid nano-particle for the vaccine??
I think you'd like my first article above. It talks about Bryan Ardis on snake venom, which nicotine is a cure for. They also were trying to restrict real nicotine and replace it with all synthetic. Malone is neck-deep in all of this, from getting contracts for DoD e-cig prototypes for testing. Why?
Oh, you can bet on me reviewing all the info. Making my way through the first video now. Got the two substack articles pasted into my new "Vaping & Covid" file. Until now, it was just a thought I had, so no file yet.
The Malone connection is intensely interesting and is more than enough to expand on my initial picture of the situation.
I don't think covid was a coverup of the 2019 vaping lung issue. I think it was more of a dry run test prior to the main release. They needed to see for sure what it would do to humans, they needed to know if it was strong enough. to meet their needs.
Yay, happy to have a cohort in conspiracy research! You'll want to be putting Mark's 2-hr podcast in that shiny new file too. He really turns your (and my) random thought into an issue of importance. You'll really like the interview between Malone and Andrew Huff where Huff talks about being offered a 'boatload of money' to go to Juul, the vaping company. Without knowing this, Mark had sent him data on a sudden spike in vaping ER visits and he responded with "Controlled opposition! Blocked!" Mark happened to be pouring cement when he got that note and wondered, "Where's the money if I'm CO?"
No, Covid was certainly not a coverup of the vaping. But was the vaping the vector for spreading the biologiical? chemical? weapon? Was it connected to cobra venom, as Ardis researches? The vaccines are the bullet but they needed a trigger.
Entered the first video url into the file first thing, while I was watching it. Malone in Vaping is something different and interesting. The two substacks also had quite a few links to follow, so it will be a fun ride to the end of the tentacles, picking up more links to pertinent info in comments sections along the way. Or, ... same as usual that I do for all the other files. lol
I read Malone's Substack and have read his book. I'm not familiar with your present claims, but I do know for a fact that Malone has never hidden his past (present?) connections or work with DTRA and perhaps other agencies. People are of course free to doubt his sincerity, but I say give the man credit for (apparently) not hiding much.
After this comment, I posted this episode on him that also links the 12 others that I've done at the end: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/malones-million-dollar-pity-party. It's 90% direct quotes from Malone or articles on him that he linked. They show that he had $20.7M to test HCQ as a repurposed drug, which was already the standard of care for NY patients. Somehow, in his fight over credit for famotidine, which had no data at all to back it up, HCQ ends up being taken out of use as ineffective and unsafe. From the whistleblower, who was the Director of BARDA at the time, this was a money-making grab of cronyism.
He's now served the Breggins with his $25M lawsuit, which you're funding, as he states. So you should look at those articles including https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/in-defense-of-the-breggins-part-one and see if you feel good about giving him "the freedom to pursue legal action." I was also a paid sub until he posted the lawsuit he'd filed and I read it. That was when I did my first analysis and realized I'd been duped: https://thirdparadigm.substack.com/p/who-is-robert-malone-really?
I smoke socially and have not been sick in years. Weird.
You're not alone. There are statistical results from Europe that nicotine smokers were not getting sick. I think I link some in my articles. Oh look! Martha and Guido are all over the question! Excellent, I'll copy these into my own brand new folder, aka Substack draft, for a future episode. Thanks!
From the NIH Library ~ first posted 10-12-20:
Efficacy of Nicotine in Preventing COVID-19 Infection (NICOVID-PREV)
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04583410
That one seems to have gone nowhere.
Here are some leads I just dredged up though.
— BMJ comment, Jan 2020, “Nicotine and COVID-19,” concluding “the evidence suggests that nicotine or other nicotinic agonists could have beneficial effects against severe COVID-19.”
— Jerusalem Post, June 2020, “Israeli study points to nicotine as a potential therapeutic for COVID-19.”
— Medical News, July 2020, “Involvement of nicotine receptors in COVID-19” (nicotine interferes with spike protein).
— Cureus Journal, October 2020, “Does Nicotine Prevent Cytokine Storms in COVID-19?” (Nicotine may act as an anti-inflammatory that prevents cytokine storms caused by spike protein).
— American Council on Health and Science, June 2020, “Does Smoking Prevent COVID-19? We Don’t Know, But Some Journalists Don’t Want To Find Out.”
— Journal of Biophysics, February 2021, “A potential interaction between the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and nicotinic acetylcholine receptors” (nicotine interferes with spike protein).
— GLP, October 2021, “Smokers are less likely to get COVID: French researchers explore whether nicotine might prevent transmission.”
— Medical Hypotheses, January 2022, “Nicotinic receptors as SARS-CoV-2 spike co-receptors?” (nicotine interferes with spike protein).
Great research! I have read a lot about nicotine and the spike protein, but apparently only bothered to bookmark that one article ~ 🤦♀️.
I mention both of your research in my last video, Malone & Slaughterhouse Four: https://youtu.be/i9tCMkRz5qA. Up on Substack later tonight.
Thanks
I personally think Fauci and a few friends like maybe Obama released it.