One HAS to ask the question - Why is The Times reporting this finally???? Because all of us here find this to be old news. I am suspicious that this is to draw attention away from the fact that the US gov't was behind the majority of the pandemic AND the jab. And also to provide a reason to go to a hot war with China (we are already at w…
One HAS to ask the question - Why is The Times reporting this finally???? Because all of us here find this to be old news. I am suspicious that this is to draw attention away from the fact that the US gov't was behind the majority of the pandemic AND the jab. And also to provide a reason to go to a hot war with China (we are already at war with them, it's just been 5th gen/covert)....the economy is on the edge of collapse and only a war can save the Uniparty's bacon now. Otherwise all the gun owning Americans will be pretty pissed about losing their 401k's. Honestly, I think they were hoping to pushed us into a violent response during all these overreaching Covid policies so they could enforce martial law BEFORE the economic collapse. So yeah. Color me suspicious when MSM prints a piece of the Truth. They are, and always will be, puppet shills.
It’s old news for us, those who have been paying attention. But it’s new information for most of those who fell for the lies that the government and media have been pushing.
Just because it’s ‘old news’ to us doesn’t necessarily make it untrue.
Very good question - if you consider that these "events" are, say, the alphabet, they are beginning at, say, D; and A- C might be the fraud of these dangerous mRNA drugs they have dared not - at least up to now - question; the latest of which the UK MHRA, now a self titled "drug enabler" and not a drug regulator, has been waved through. The utterly scary thing is the admittance by UK MHRA of the paucity of the testing regimes adopted in the trial of a drug majorly funded by Gates - is Dame June Raine so emboldened that she admits to criminal lack of oversight - because she has been allowed to get away with the egregious "no short cuts were taken" bollux with the mRNA SARS COV2 drugs - subsequently shown to be a tissue of lies; why has she not been arrested? (rhetorical....)
The Daily Telegraph has done a similar thing with the Hancock WhatsApp messages and now the Dowden controlled censorship scandal in bed with, amongst others, Big Tech. They have surely ignored the scope of what the Times has published - will either of them or the rest of the MSM report Dr Thomas Binder's scientifically indisputable take down of the entire SARS COV2/RT PCR/CV19/mRNA scamdemic? I dont know what these broadsheets and others "know" and they certainly have been "shills" to the narrative to date; but their volte face has to start somewhere. Please remember that the TNI is the public face of the WHO/WEF/Gates/Pharma/Big tech nexus - even though that is now crumbling given the efforts of Canadians to scupper CNBC's epically poor track record?
I consider the Times investigation to be "A Good Thing" - lets see where it goes and who joins it. It also occurs to me that Woodward and Bernstein faced a very sceptical Bradlee and others running TWP before numerous criminal cases resulted in resignations and stir time for a lot of those who denied everything up 'til then - and their dogged work was shown to be 100% true, thanks due to Mark Felt for sure. Is this what is starting to run now? I wonder what Mark Steyn thinks ?
One HAS to ask the question - Why is The Times reporting this finally???? Because all of us here find this to be old news. I am suspicious that this is to draw attention away from the fact that the US gov't was behind the majority of the pandemic AND the jab. And also to provide a reason to go to a hot war with China (we are already at war with them, it's just been 5th gen/covert)....the economy is on the edge of collapse and only a war can save the Uniparty's bacon now. Otherwise all the gun owning Americans will be pretty pissed about losing their 401k's. Honestly, I think they were hoping to pushed us into a violent response during all these overreaching Covid policies so they could enforce martial law BEFORE the economic collapse. So yeah. Color me suspicious when MSM prints a piece of the Truth. They are, and always will be, puppet shills.
It’s old news for us, those who have been paying attention. But it’s new information for most of those who fell for the lies that the government and media have been pushing.
Just because it’s ‘old news’ to us doesn’t necessarily make it untrue.
Very good question - if you consider that these "events" are, say, the alphabet, they are beginning at, say, D; and A- C might be the fraud of these dangerous mRNA drugs they have dared not - at least up to now - question; the latest of which the UK MHRA, now a self titled "drug enabler" and not a drug regulator, has been waved through. The utterly scary thing is the admittance by UK MHRA of the paucity of the testing regimes adopted in the trial of a drug majorly funded by Gates - is Dame June Raine so emboldened that she admits to criminal lack of oversight - because she has been allowed to get away with the egregious "no short cuts were taken" bollux with the mRNA SARS COV2 drugs - subsequently shown to be a tissue of lies; why has she not been arrested? (rhetorical....)
The Daily Telegraph has done a similar thing with the Hancock WhatsApp messages and now the Dowden controlled censorship scandal in bed with, amongst others, Big Tech. They have surely ignored the scope of what the Times has published - will either of them or the rest of the MSM report Dr Thomas Binder's scientifically indisputable take down of the entire SARS COV2/RT PCR/CV19/mRNA scamdemic? I dont know what these broadsheets and others "know" and they certainly have been "shills" to the narrative to date; but their volte face has to start somewhere. Please remember that the TNI is the public face of the WHO/WEF/Gates/Pharma/Big tech nexus - even though that is now crumbling given the efforts of Canadians to scupper CNBC's epically poor track record?
I consider the Times investigation to be "A Good Thing" - lets see where it goes and who joins it. It also occurs to me that Woodward and Bernstein faced a very sceptical Bradlee and others running TWP before numerous criminal cases resulted in resignations and stir time for a lot of those who denied everything up 'til then - and their dogged work was shown to be 100% true, thanks due to Mark Felt for sure. Is this what is starting to run now? I wonder what Mark Steyn thinks ?