Obviously, a court case of this magnitude will take a long time to resolve, and for many people who have already rolled up their sleeves it will be too late to do more than reinforce any case they may make for recompense in respect of adverse reactions.
This, however, is no reason to let off the hook the perpetrators of the worst-ever …
Obviously, a court case of this magnitude will take a long time to resolve, and for many people who have already rolled up their sleeves it will be too late to do more than reinforce any case they may make for recompense in respect of adverse reactions.
This, however, is no reason to let off the hook the perpetrators of the worst-ever medical crime against humanity. Should we have not have had the Nuremburg trials after WW2, which most people at the time seemed to consider worthwhile?
Assuming the mass media doesn't simply ignore the upcoming US proceedings, the damning evidence presented will, hopefully, persuade large numbers of unvaccinated people across the world to stay that way and bring the whole wretched jabfest to an end.
Obviously, a court case of this magnitude will take a long time to resolve, and for many people who have already rolled up their sleeves it will be too late to do more than reinforce any case they may make for recompense in respect of adverse reactions.
This, however, is no reason to let off the hook the perpetrators of the worst-ever medical crime against humanity. Should we have not have had the Nuremburg trials after WW2, which most people at the time seemed to consider worthwhile?
Assuming the mass media doesn't simply ignore the upcoming US proceedings, the damning evidence presented will, hopefully, persuade large numbers of unvaccinated people across the world to stay that way and bring the whole wretched jabfest to an end.