Re the 'young and healthy'...
In Australia, according to government statistics, 2,153,200 children aged 5-15 years have had one Covid jab. 1,858,599 children aged 5-15 years have had two Covid jabs: https://www.health.gov.au/our-work/covid-19-vaccines/vaccination-numbers-and-statistics
These needles are unnecessary, and potentially harmf…
I haven't received a response to my email to Nigel Crawford.
I've subsequently followed up on this matter with the then President of the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, Karen Price (9 May 2022). No response.
And also the Federal Health Minister, Mark Butler (18 November 2022). No response.
It's awful in Australia, where so many people have been pressured, coerced and manipulated to submit to the jabs under mandates, e.g. No Jab, No Job.
'Informed consent' has been trashed.
The medical and scientific establishment is an ethical wasteland, along with politicians and the mainstream media. This isn't a liberal democracy, it's tyranny.
Aside from the increasingly evident possiblity this is to sterilise the human population and reduce life expectancy, the more.immediate matter is one of shareholder risk....
Under the United States CARES Act and PREP Act, a vaccine used under an Emergency Use Authorisation has automatic blanket indemnity granted by the state. No one can sue the manufacturers regardless of harm caused.
If this indemnity is to continue once the vaccine is fully approved, the vaccine must be approved for children and recommended/ mandated as part of the childhood vaccination programme.
If the vaccines aren't approved for children, the manufacturers won't enjoy indemnity for any age group under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986.
This is one reason why children are being subjected to this experimental injection under an EUA, even though there isn't an emergency in their age group.
This is also why this vaccine, which isn't a vaccine, is being called a vaccine, because indemnity only applies to vaccines and no other class of pharmaceuticals.
The US Centers for Disease Control estimated children are at a ten fold greater risk from influenza than they are CoVID-19.
The Nuremberg Charter, written after the horror of medical experimentation by the Third Reich to protect bodily autonomy, was never actually ratified by nations rather, it was the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights.
Article 6 – Consent
1. Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice.
2. Scientific research should only be carried out with the prior, free, express and informed consent of the person concerned. The information should be adequate, provided in a comprehensible form and should include modalities for withdrawal of consent. Consent may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without any disadvantage or prejudice. Exceptions to this principle should be made only in accordance with ethical and legal standards adopted by States, consistent with the principles and provisions set out in this Declaration, in particular in Article 27, and international human rights law.
3. In appropriate cases of research carried out on a group of persons or a community, additional agreement of the legal representatives of the group or community concerned may be sought. In no case should a collective community agreement or the consent of a community leader or other authority substitute for an individual’s informed consent.
Article 27 – Limitations on the application of the principles
If the application of the principles of this Declaration is to be limited, it should be by law, including laws in the interests of public safety, for the investigation, detection and prosecution of criminal offences, for the protection of public health or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others. Any such law needs to be consistent with international human rights law.
_____
Article 6 of the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights enshrines the fundamentals of the Nuremberg Charter into international law and, for the purposes of these CoVID-19 injections, is being criminally subverted by fraudulently invoking Article 27, which suspends Article 6 on the basis of a "public emergency" to justify Emergency Use Authorisation.
These "vaccines" fail all the legal tests for Emergency Use Authorisation
1. There is no emergency, especially in the under 65 with no underlying health conditions;
2. Existing safe and effective treatments are available, especially for early intervention;
3. These injections do not meet the required efficacy, preventing neither transmission or contagion;
4. There is substantial evidence of serious injury and death.
"But we’re never going to learn about how safe this vaccine is unless we start giving it. That’s just the way it goes. That’s how we found out about rare complications of other vaccines like the rotavirus vaccine. And I do think we should vote to approve it." - Dr. Eric Ruben, Editor of the New England Journal of Medicine at the FDA approval hearing for EUA for the children under the age of 12.
Also, in July 2021, the former Morrison government advised health practitioners they had specific medical indemnity for administering Covid Jabs...it now turns out this is a lie. They do NOT have specific medical indemnity for Covid jabs.
And have any of the practitioners properly obtained informed consent, as they are obliged to do?
I'm pursuing this matter with medical insurers and other parties.
All power to you! The insider public servant secret is that Public Service in Australia provides no significant benefit ( less then 20%) to Australians.Its primary purpose is that it keeps people employed. It is a form of high paid Centerlink benefit. Every public servant knows it although they wont admit it to the outsider. Look at the Outcome Statement project deliverables and matrix of success.
Re the 'young and healthy'...
In Australia, according to government statistics, 2,153,200 children aged 5-15 years have had one Covid jab. 1,858,599 children aged 5-15 years have had two Covid jabs: https://www.health.gov.au/our-work/covid-19-vaccines/vaccination-numbers-and-statistics
These needles are unnecessary, and potentially harmful, medical interventions pressed upon children...
I challenged the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation on this matter, see my email to the Chair, Nigel Crawford:
Why does ATAGI recommend COVID-19 mRNA injections for all children aged 5 to 11 years? 22 April 2022: https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2022/04/why-does-atagi-recommend-covid-19-mrna-injections-for-all-children-aged-5-to-11-years.pdf
I haven't received a response to my email to Nigel Crawford.
I've subsequently followed up on this matter with the then President of the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, Karen Price (9 May 2022). No response.
And also the Federal Health Minister, Mark Butler (18 November 2022). No response.
It's awful in Australia, where so many people have been pressured, coerced and manipulated to submit to the jabs under mandates, e.g. No Jab, No Job.
'Informed consent' has been trashed.
The medical and scientific establishment is an ethical wasteland, along with politicians and the mainstream media. This isn't a liberal democracy, it's tyranny.
Aside from the increasingly evident possiblity this is to sterilise the human population and reduce life expectancy, the more.immediate matter is one of shareholder risk....
Under the United States CARES Act and PREP Act, a vaccine used under an Emergency Use Authorisation has automatic blanket indemnity granted by the state. No one can sue the manufacturers regardless of harm caused.
If this indemnity is to continue once the vaccine is fully approved, the vaccine must be approved for children and recommended/ mandated as part of the childhood vaccination programme.
If the vaccines aren't approved for children, the manufacturers won't enjoy indemnity for any age group under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986.
This is one reason why children are being subjected to this experimental injection under an EUA, even though there isn't an emergency in their age group.
This is also why this vaccine, which isn't a vaccine, is being called a vaccine, because indemnity only applies to vaccines and no other class of pharmaceuticals.
The US Centers for Disease Control estimated children are at a ten fold greater risk from influenza than they are CoVID-19.
The Nuremberg Charter, written after the horror of medical experimentation by the Third Reich to protect bodily autonomy, was never actually ratified by nations rather, it was the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights.
Article 6 – Consent
1. Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice.
2. Scientific research should only be carried out with the prior, free, express and informed consent of the person concerned. The information should be adequate, provided in a comprehensible form and should include modalities for withdrawal of consent. Consent may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without any disadvantage or prejudice. Exceptions to this principle should be made only in accordance with ethical and legal standards adopted by States, consistent with the principles and provisions set out in this Declaration, in particular in Article 27, and international human rights law.
3. In appropriate cases of research carried out on a group of persons or a community, additional agreement of the legal representatives of the group or community concerned may be sought. In no case should a collective community agreement or the consent of a community leader or other authority substitute for an individual’s informed consent.
Article 27 – Limitations on the application of the principles
If the application of the principles of this Declaration is to be limited, it should be by law, including laws in the interests of public safety, for the investigation, detection and prosecution of criminal offences, for the protection of public health or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others. Any such law needs to be consistent with international human rights law.
_____
Article 6 of the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights enshrines the fundamentals of the Nuremberg Charter into international law and, for the purposes of these CoVID-19 injections, is being criminally subverted by fraudulently invoking Article 27, which suspends Article 6 on the basis of a "public emergency" to justify Emergency Use Authorisation.
These "vaccines" fail all the legal tests for Emergency Use Authorisation
1. There is no emergency, especially in the under 65 with no underlying health conditions;
2. Existing safe and effective treatments are available, especially for early intervention;
3. These injections do not meet the required efficacy, preventing neither transmission or contagion;
4. There is substantial evidence of serious injury and death.
"But we’re never going to learn about how safe this vaccine is unless we start giving it. That’s just the way it goes. That’s how we found out about rare complications of other vaccines like the rotavirus vaccine. And I do think we should vote to approve it." - Dr. Eric Ruben, Editor of the New England Journal of Medicine at the FDA approval hearing for EUA for the children under the age of 12.
Mike, in Australia, I have a recent letter from the Department of Health and Aged Care confirming to me:
"Informed consent should be obtained for every COVID-19 vaccination, as per usual consent procedures for other vaccinations."
This is clear and unambiguous, would you not agree?
But who has been properly informed about these jabs? I suggest no-one has been properly informed... And here we are, with 64.5 million Covid needles stuck in arms... https://www.health.gov.au/our-work/covid-19-vaccines/vaccination-numbers-and-statistics
Also, in July 2021, the former Morrison government advised health practitioners they had specific medical indemnity for administering Covid Jabs...it now turns out this is a lie. They do NOT have specific medical indemnity for Covid jabs.
And have any of the practitioners properly obtained informed consent, as they are obliged to do?
I'm pursuing this matter with medical insurers and other parties.
See response from the Australian Department of Health and Aged Care: https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2022/11/mc22-018819-signed-highlighted-1.pdf
See my correspondence to Federal Health Minister Mark Butler: https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2022/12/response-re_-are-health-practitioners-covered-for-indemnity-insurance-re-the-covid-jabs2.pdf
Try and get one of the safety information inserts (massive sheet of paper) that come with these injections when delivered to clinics.
The ones I saw being presented to Senator Ron Johnson had "Intentionally Blank" on them and nothing else.
These pages are supposed to be the basis of informed consent.
All power to you! The insider public servant secret is that Public Service in Australia provides no significant benefit ( less then 20%) to Australians.Its primary purpose is that it keeps people employed. It is a form of high paid Centerlink benefit. Every public servant knows it although they wont admit it to the outsider. Look at the Outcome Statement project deliverables and matrix of success.
Informed consent was impossible from the outset b/c we have NO data about long term harms. Period.
100 % Agree