“Now I know why you didn’t provide a link…”. Interesting that you “know” what I didn’t say. I thought about providing the link, but decided not to out of sheer laziness. LOL. I’m not a deceptive person. Ruechel has written many articles and I’m not going to bother to spend time trying to find out where the quote comes from that you p…
“Now I know why you didn’t provide a link…”. Interesting that you “know” what I didn’t say. I thought about providing the link, but decided not to out of sheer laziness. LOL. I’m not a deceptive person. Ruechel has written many articles and I’m not going to bother to spend time trying to find out where the quote comes from that you provided. The article that I referred to was one in which Ruechel made the case for the innate immune system being so revved up fighting C19 that most other URI viruses including influenza, were kept from ever replicating. I know enough, both through reading people like McCullough, Kory, Marik, and in my own treatment of patients with this illness, to know that it isn’t influensa in most cases. I’m sure there are exceptions but I don’t think many. As natural immunity to C19 becomes more and more widespread It will be interesting to see if Ruechel was right, that there will be a return of influenza. Btw, I do think it is courteous to provide links, but I expect most people reading comments here to be well-informed enough that they will be familiar with most widely-followed authors like Ruechel. For those who can’t do that without a link, it’s easy to stop reading and go to the next comment.
"Appealing to authorities?" Not sure why you ask that question. In the beginning of this operation my knee-jerk reaction was actually that this is the flu being paraded around as a new, mysterious very deadly virus. It was obvious to me that a giant psyop was in play and that was my initial thought, which I continued with for a few months during the early spring 2000. I'm retired and no longer in practice but still have contact with MD's I used to practice with. I asked pulmonologists I knew how they could distinguish between C19 and the flu. The reply wasn't really satisfactory because it was, in fact, mainly a negative flu test and a positive PCR (which we all know was not reliable for many reasons) for C19. The pulmonologist I was in touch with was mainly treating patients in the ICU and they basically had an ARDS/sepsis picture. Although I did hear reports from other MD's about catecholamine storms which I had never heard of before in relationship to influenza. So there were questions. I have relied on reports from people like McCullough, Kory, and Marik because they were actually treating large numbers of patients. They were all convinced that this was, in fact, not influenza, that it was a different, nastier virus than influenza and had certain clinical symptoms (profound loss of taste and smell, catecholamine storms, two-phase sickness of viral replication and inflammation response, brain fog, long hauler syndrome) that were not associated with influenza. I eventually became convinced, not because of unreliable, manipulatable PCR testing, but because of those clinical presentations, that it was in fact not influenza, but something else which is called C19. I had to basically come out of retirement and treat a pretty large number of friends, relatives and others with early treatments of IVM and HCQ that actually work quite well and in the process I think I've learned enough to distinguish between this illness and influenza.
The fact that McCullough changed his mind about PCR tests (he qualifies his position on PCR tests by explaining its "shortcomings") and people being infected twice I see as a positive. To me it means he isn't dogmatic, ie., he follows the data and changes his mind if need be. In my own practice I initially totally discounted PCR testing, but I have to admit, after hearing for the 10th or 11th time from a patient that they tested negative several times, then were in contact with someone who got sick, and then they developed symptoms and tested again, and were positive PCR, that I had to re-examine that as well. PCR is highly manipulatable and was chosen as the "test du jour" for that reason. Still, when one is trying to make a diagnosis with a person who is sick, one has to do the best one can with what is available and try to weight the data with some kind of reliability fudge factor. I would never treat someone based on their PCR test alone. But it's definitely an observation when it repeatedly switches from negative to positive when clinical symptoms appear.
Sorry for the long answer and I don't think there is much point in beating this horse any longer.
So, you are an MD who no longer practices? That would explain it...
Have you ever used a Biofire Biodetection machine? If you had you'd at least become suspicious how after the upgrade with multiplex RT-PCR test kit all influenza positive tests disappeared and become SARS CoV2...
“Now I know why you didn’t provide a link…”. Interesting that you “know” what I didn’t say. I thought about providing the link, but decided not to out of sheer laziness. LOL. I’m not a deceptive person. Ruechel has written many articles and I’m not going to bother to spend time trying to find out where the quote comes from that you provided. The article that I referred to was one in which Ruechel made the case for the innate immune system being so revved up fighting C19 that most other URI viruses including influenza, were kept from ever replicating. I know enough, both through reading people like McCullough, Kory, Marik, and in my own treatment of patients with this illness, to know that it isn’t influensa in most cases. I’m sure there are exceptions but I don’t think many. As natural immunity to C19 becomes more and more widespread It will be interesting to see if Ruechel was right, that there will be a return of influenza. Btw, I do think it is courteous to provide links, but I expect most people reading comments here to be well-informed enough that they will be familiar with most widely-followed authors like Ruechel. For those who can’t do that without a link, it’s easy to stop reading and go to the next comment.
Appealing to authorities?
You know Dr McCullough's work?
So, you must know his public statements that the in the first stage of pandemic the PCR tests couldn't distinguish between SARS COV2 and influenza?
You must also be aware that Dr McCullough said that no one can get infected with SARS COV2 twice?
In the end all false narratives get exposed...
"Appealing to authorities?" Not sure why you ask that question. In the beginning of this operation my knee-jerk reaction was actually that this is the flu being paraded around as a new, mysterious very deadly virus. It was obvious to me that a giant psyop was in play and that was my initial thought, which I continued with for a few months during the early spring 2000. I'm retired and no longer in practice but still have contact with MD's I used to practice with. I asked pulmonologists I knew how they could distinguish between C19 and the flu. The reply wasn't really satisfactory because it was, in fact, mainly a negative flu test and a positive PCR (which we all know was not reliable for many reasons) for C19. The pulmonologist I was in touch with was mainly treating patients in the ICU and they basically had an ARDS/sepsis picture. Although I did hear reports from other MD's about catecholamine storms which I had never heard of before in relationship to influenza. So there were questions. I have relied on reports from people like McCullough, Kory, and Marik because they were actually treating large numbers of patients. They were all convinced that this was, in fact, not influenza, that it was a different, nastier virus than influenza and had certain clinical symptoms (profound loss of taste and smell, catecholamine storms, two-phase sickness of viral replication and inflammation response, brain fog, long hauler syndrome) that were not associated with influenza. I eventually became convinced, not because of unreliable, manipulatable PCR testing, but because of those clinical presentations, that it was in fact not influenza, but something else which is called C19. I had to basically come out of retirement and treat a pretty large number of friends, relatives and others with early treatments of IVM and HCQ that actually work quite well and in the process I think I've learned enough to distinguish between this illness and influenza.
The fact that McCullough changed his mind about PCR tests (he qualifies his position on PCR tests by explaining its "shortcomings") and people being infected twice I see as a positive. To me it means he isn't dogmatic, ie., he follows the data and changes his mind if need be. In my own practice I initially totally discounted PCR testing, but I have to admit, after hearing for the 10th or 11th time from a patient that they tested negative several times, then were in contact with someone who got sick, and then they developed symptoms and tested again, and were positive PCR, that I had to re-examine that as well. PCR is highly manipulatable and was chosen as the "test du jour" for that reason. Still, when one is trying to make a diagnosis with a person who is sick, one has to do the best one can with what is available and try to weight the data with some kind of reliability fudge factor. I would never treat someone based on their PCR test alone. But it's definitely an observation when it repeatedly switches from negative to positive when clinical symptoms appear.
Sorry for the long answer and I don't think there is much point in beating this horse any longer.
So, you are an MD who no longer practices? That would explain it...
Have you ever used a Biofire Biodetection machine? If you had you'd at least become suspicious how after the upgrade with multiplex RT-PCR test kit all influenza positive tests disappeared and become SARS CoV2...