Numerous studies have now clearly documented a noticeably dampened T-cell 8+/4+ response to other viruses and cancer cells, in part because the pseudouridine substitution in the mRNA vaccine negatively affects the toll-like receptors 3, 7, and 8. In the long-term, this is especially worrying with respect to cancer, and pathologists in several independent labs in a number of countries are witnessing an explosion in unusual cancers among the vaccinated. GPs, too, are expressing concern over unusual and far more frequent types of cancer, even in young people, than they had ever witnessed before in their careers. One doctor in Florida noted that he had seen 5 younger patients this year alone with an unusual type of kidney cancer. He had seen only one such case in the prior years he had been practicing. German pathologists has used the terms "turbo cancer" to describe the sudden re-emergence of particularly aggressive forms of cancer in vaccinated patients that had been successfully treated and were in remission prior to vaccination.
The same types of susceptibility in the vaccinated are now being documented for Epstein-Barr, Herpes simplex, Herpes zoster, and several other viruses.
Absolutely fascinating! A very insightful and prescient piece by Mark L. It's impressive that this was written nine months ago, but certainly very concerning for our collective future that it appears to be largely accurate. The section predicting an increase in deaths from cardiovascular causes gave me goosebumps given how we are seeing that play out with regard to excess mortality data in many countries. And to think that regulatory authorities are still pushing ahead with their plans to vaccinate babies and small children. In all my years as a nurse, I could never have imagined we'd reach such depths of unethical practice.
Very interesting. I was close to dismissing this because he kept reinforcing they are highly effective against severe disease which is the opposite of what we are seeing now, but then point 6 about seeing more cases of spike protein toxicity vs cytokine storms fits. In Australia there are very few people on ventilators but deaths are continuously climbing. That was attributed to omicron's decreased ability to infect lung cells, however in my very non-expert opinion spike protein toxicity is a better fit especially since unvaccinated people aren't really dying in large numbers compared to the multi jabbed
This would be a lot less of a problem if the psuedouridine substitution didn't cause the injection-induced spike to be so long lasting. Makes you wonder if that was expected. If the spike protein, with all its special regions like amyloidogenic and pro prion formation and hiv inserts and human protein analogues is indeed intended to harm, keeping it around in the body by inducing tolerance would seem really sinister.
Let's discuss something simpler and probably more productive in terms of persuading people why not to listen to the FDA. And it would probably persuade a jury.
Start with the FDA's basis for giving HCQ to hospitalized patients instead of ambulatory patients. The FDA claimed that hospitalized patients would receive more benefit than ambulatory patients with mild covid, which is absurd. Patients who have been hospitalized for covid went thru a phase where they were ambulatory with mild covid, then covid progressed to the moderate phase. So the FDA was unconcerned about covid progressing, despite all of the panic mongering about limited hospital resources.
Now it's true that most mild cases of covid resolve without progressing. However, the problem is the high risk patients in whom covid progresses. They are especially the ones who need antivirals while covid is mild.
Isn't this patently obvious to everyone, or just to me?
This is an elegant hypothesis on the intended and unintended consequences of mRNA vaccinations. Immune intolerance to spike protein and an unsetting of the immune system causing compromised clearance of other diseases.
As vaccine immunity wanes and if vaccines are stopped, could the immune system return to pre mRNA conditions or are the vaccinated immune systems jeopardised forever?
Do the vaxxed have protection against severe disease or is that just "the narrative"?
The last UK Health Security Agency report that provided deaths by vaxx status (week 13) showed more deaths in the triple-jabbed than vaxx free in all adult cohorts. There were more deaths in the vaxxed in most cohorts for months. Of course, the UKHSA found a cure for their bad data. They just stopped publishing it.
Geert Vanden Bossche thinks the apparent protection against severe disease with Omicron is actually an interplay between the virus, airway cells, and non-neutralizing antibodies. He predicts the virus will find a workaround soon.
this immediately makes sense and explains what we are seeing all around us. my vaccinated friends are all getting covid again and again, sometimes rather seriously. i know 4 people who have died- 1) sudden upper right ventrical heart trouble in a 72 year old a month after the J&J, 2) mysterious unexplained death in a 41 yr old who only got vaccinated to save his job, 3) a woman in the UK who developed a rapid onset motor neuron disease with a large inoperable mass in her brain, deteriorated quickly and was dead inside of two months and 4) sudden liver failure in an older woman. in all cases the relatives were shocked as the losses came out of nowhere. i talked to example #1 from her hospital room and she asked me "how did i get heart damage?" and "they want me to sign a DNR!" we talked about it and she didn't sign, but was dead a few days later anyway.
with such a "safe and effective" product, the odds that i would experience even one odd death would seem to be vanishingly low. but 4?
Jun 17, 2022·edited Jun 17, 2022Liked by Igor Chudov
For over two years all we've heard is virus and vaccine. Let's be clear - anyone who was fooled with the vaccine, may need to clean out the gene pool. Things have to make sense, or we're going to sink. The body is quite a creation and people can detox but really, if people keep putting stuff they don't know into their body, they will - and should - reap the consequences. Humanity can't afford this kind of blind ignorance any more. It risks the life of every species. The ignore-ance is so dense that it is as bad as toddlers in charge of ballistic missiles.
The author talks about long Covid being less prevalent among the vaccinated (which was certainly what was advertised at the time this was written), but I believe it is beginning to appear that the opposite is true (though good luck trying to find data on it if it is). I think this could also be explained within the framework of immune tolerance-- tolerate the enemy briefly and everything seems peaceful; but prolonged tolerance of the enemy gives it time and space to cause damage. (Also, many vaccinated people seem to be developing long covid symptoms after their second or third bout with the virus, anecdotally at least...as you've said before, the more times you get something, even a mild illness, the more potential it has to cause problems.)
"Furthermore, regulatory T-cell activation can non-specifically dampen immune response to other pathogens, leading to increased incidence of secondary infections."
It bears remembering that the virtue signalers at WHO, in making the case to rename monkeypox, made two key assertions: there are a number of genomes that don't fit cleanly in the West African clade, and monkeypox is spreading human-to-human in Western Europe, a region with high inoculation uptake.
Once you study the pharmaceutical industry, you begin to notice how typical it is that they will introduce an ineffective drug that causes a lot of problems, and then make an enormous amount of money providing "treatment "for the side effects of the original drug. The entire Covid thing is so F***** frustrating because if we had just done what Africa did (open everything up over the summer right after Covid started and let the population get herd immunity) this whole thing will be over and far far far fewer people would have gotten sick with or died from Covid.
Separately, I had a few thoughts on this theory. Some of it holds up and some of it does not. Overall, my present belief is that the toxicity from the spike protein is due to the spike protein being a potent allergen, the spike proteins attacking the vascular endothelium and the spike protein being an effective flocculant (this is what the book I sent you was on) which causes fluid to coagulate (leading to things such as blood clots).
It has been consistently observed that the adverse reactions to vaccination are worse with each successive vaccination, and are worse than individuals who have had Covid prior to being vaccinated. I have interpreted this as either meaning that they are being allergicly sensitized to the spike protein, or that each vaccination is increasing the degree of clotting and fluid stagnation inside their body until they hit a critical threshold they cannot tolerate an symptomatology develops.
Each of these models, and I have seen numerous people have success treating Covid using either one (I tend to use the latter more than the former).
Similarly, the spike protein vaccines have an extraordinary rate of associated immunity, and they leave the cell membranes and rapidly distributed throughout the body.
All of this argues against an immune tolerance phenomena occurring.
At the same time, I do also think it's possible that immune tolerance could be occurring and that would explain many of the things that have been observed.
I am also not sure if you're aware of this, but one of the curious things about Covid in hospitalized patients, is that the infection typically becomes the worst about a week into the infection after the viral load has dropped and the patient system (because the immune system has eliminated the virus). Many people theorize this was because the immune system eliminating the virus caused a large number of spike proteins to be released into the body.
Numerous studies have now clearly documented a noticeably dampened T-cell 8+/4+ response to other viruses and cancer cells, in part because the pseudouridine substitution in the mRNA vaccine negatively affects the toll-like receptors 3, 7, and 8. In the long-term, this is especially worrying with respect to cancer, and pathologists in several independent labs in a number of countries are witnessing an explosion in unusual cancers among the vaccinated. GPs, too, are expressing concern over unusual and far more frequent types of cancer, even in young people, than they had ever witnessed before in their careers. One doctor in Florida noted that he had seen 5 younger patients this year alone with an unusual type of kidney cancer. He had seen only one such case in the prior years he had been practicing. German pathologists has used the terms "turbo cancer" to describe the sudden re-emergence of particularly aggressive forms of cancer in vaccinated patients that had been successfully treated and were in remission prior to vaccination.
The same types of susceptibility in the vaccinated are now being documented for Epstein-Barr, Herpes simplex, Herpes zoster, and several other viruses.
Absolutely fascinating! A very insightful and prescient piece by Mark L. It's impressive that this was written nine months ago, but certainly very concerning for our collective future that it appears to be largely accurate. The section predicting an increase in deaths from cardiovascular causes gave me goosebumps given how we are seeing that play out with regard to excess mortality data in many countries. And to think that regulatory authorities are still pushing ahead with their plans to vaccinate babies and small children. In all my years as a nurse, I could never have imagined we'd reach such depths of unethical practice.
This is the definition of the ratcheting effect!
Difficult to reverse once it is underway or has already occurred.
And it's a boomerang at the same time.
I feel like we're just toy soldiers, in suspended animation, eyes wide as saucers, waiting on the tsunami
Very, very good post Igor. My God.
Very interesting. I was close to dismissing this because he kept reinforcing they are highly effective against severe disease which is the opposite of what we are seeing now, but then point 6 about seeing more cases of spike protein toxicity vs cytokine storms fits. In Australia there are very few people on ventilators but deaths are continuously climbing. That was attributed to omicron's decreased ability to infect lung cells, however in my very non-expert opinion spike protein toxicity is a better fit especially since unvaccinated people aren't really dying in large numbers compared to the multi jabbed
This would be a lot less of a problem if the psuedouridine substitution didn't cause the injection-induced spike to be so long lasting. Makes you wonder if that was expected. If the spike protein, with all its special regions like amyloidogenic and pro prion formation and hiv inserts and human protein analogues is indeed intended to harm, keeping it around in the body by inducing tolerance would seem really sinister.
Let's discuss something simpler and probably more productive in terms of persuading people why not to listen to the FDA. And it would probably persuade a jury.
Start with the FDA's basis for giving HCQ to hospitalized patients instead of ambulatory patients. The FDA claimed that hospitalized patients would receive more benefit than ambulatory patients with mild covid, which is absurd. Patients who have been hospitalized for covid went thru a phase where they were ambulatory with mild covid, then covid progressed to the moderate phase. So the FDA was unconcerned about covid progressing, despite all of the panic mongering about limited hospital resources.
Now it's true that most mild cases of covid resolve without progressing. However, the problem is the high risk patients in whom covid progresses. They are especially the ones who need antivirals while covid is mild.
Isn't this patently obvious to everyone, or just to me?
This is an elegant hypothesis on the intended and unintended consequences of mRNA vaccinations. Immune intolerance to spike protein and an unsetting of the immune system causing compromised clearance of other diseases.
As vaccine immunity wanes and if vaccines are stopped, could the immune system return to pre mRNA conditions or are the vaccinated immune systems jeopardised forever?
Do the vaxxed have protection against severe disease or is that just "the narrative"?
The last UK Health Security Agency report that provided deaths by vaxx status (week 13) showed more deaths in the triple-jabbed than vaxx free in all adult cohorts. There were more deaths in the vaxxed in most cohorts for months. Of course, the UKHSA found a cure for their bad data. They just stopped publishing it.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-vaccine-weekly-surveillance-reports
Geert Vanden Bossche thinks the apparent protection against severe disease with Omicron is actually an interplay between the virus, airway cells, and non-neutralizing antibodies. He predicts the virus will find a workaround soon.
https://www.headwind.tv/headwind2episode2geertvandenbossche
this immediately makes sense and explains what we are seeing all around us. my vaccinated friends are all getting covid again and again, sometimes rather seriously. i know 4 people who have died- 1) sudden upper right ventrical heart trouble in a 72 year old a month after the J&J, 2) mysterious unexplained death in a 41 yr old who only got vaccinated to save his job, 3) a woman in the UK who developed a rapid onset motor neuron disease with a large inoperable mass in her brain, deteriorated quickly and was dead inside of two months and 4) sudden liver failure in an older woman. in all cases the relatives were shocked as the losses came out of nowhere. i talked to example #1 from her hospital room and she asked me "how did i get heart damage?" and "they want me to sign a DNR!" we talked about it and she didn't sign, but was dead a few days later anyway.
with such a "safe and effective" product, the odds that i would experience even one odd death would seem to be vanishingly low. but 4?
It's a crime against Immunity.
For over two years all we've heard is virus and vaccine. Let's be clear - anyone who was fooled with the vaccine, may need to clean out the gene pool. Things have to make sense, or we're going to sink. The body is quite a creation and people can detox but really, if people keep putting stuff they don't know into their body, they will - and should - reap the consequences. Humanity can't afford this kind of blind ignorance any more. It risks the life of every species. The ignore-ance is so dense that it is as bad as toddlers in charge of ballistic missiles.
The author talks about long Covid being less prevalent among the vaccinated (which was certainly what was advertised at the time this was written), but I believe it is beginning to appear that the opposite is true (though good luck trying to find data on it if it is). I think this could also be explained within the framework of immune tolerance-- tolerate the enemy briefly and everything seems peaceful; but prolonged tolerance of the enemy gives it time and space to cause damage. (Also, many vaccinated people seem to be developing long covid symptoms after their second or third bout with the virus, anecdotally at least...as you've said before, the more times you get something, even a mild illness, the more potential it has to cause problems.)
"Furthermore, regulatory T-cell activation can non-specifically dampen immune response to other pathogens, leading to increased incidence of secondary infections."
It bears remembering that the virtue signalers at WHO, in making the case to rename monkeypox, made two key assertions: there are a number of genomes that don't fit cleanly in the West African clade, and monkeypox is spreading human-to-human in Western Europe, a region with high inoculation uptake.
https://allfactsmatter.substack.com/p/the-faucists-dilemma-politically
If the inoculations dampen broad immune system response, that goes a long way in explaining the increased pathogenicity.
That's still a speculation, but if the immune system damage is comprehensive in the human host, the monkeypox outbreak gets much easier to explain.
I’ve been looking and I can’t find a country or state tracking reinfection rates or incidence of long COVID. I wonder why?
Well, anecdotally, in my circle, the jabbed are getting much more severely sicker than the unjabbed, as well as more frequently sick.
Once you study the pharmaceutical industry, you begin to notice how typical it is that they will introduce an ineffective drug that causes a lot of problems, and then make an enormous amount of money providing "treatment "for the side effects of the original drug. The entire Covid thing is so F***** frustrating because if we had just done what Africa did (open everything up over the summer right after Covid started and let the population get herd immunity) this whole thing will be over and far far far fewer people would have gotten sick with or died from Covid.
Separately, I had a few thoughts on this theory. Some of it holds up and some of it does not. Overall, my present belief is that the toxicity from the spike protein is due to the spike protein being a potent allergen, the spike proteins attacking the vascular endothelium and the spike protein being an effective flocculant (this is what the book I sent you was on) which causes fluid to coagulate (leading to things such as blood clots).
It has been consistently observed that the adverse reactions to vaccination are worse with each successive vaccination, and are worse than individuals who have had Covid prior to being vaccinated. I have interpreted this as either meaning that they are being allergicly sensitized to the spike protein, or that each vaccination is increasing the degree of clotting and fluid stagnation inside their body until they hit a critical threshold they cannot tolerate an symptomatology develops.
Each of these models, and I have seen numerous people have success treating Covid using either one (I tend to use the latter more than the former).
Similarly, the spike protein vaccines have an extraordinary rate of associated immunity, and they leave the cell membranes and rapidly distributed throughout the body.
All of this argues against an immune tolerance phenomena occurring.
At the same time, I do also think it's possible that immune tolerance could be occurring and that would explain many of the things that have been observed.
I am also not sure if you're aware of this, but one of the curious things about Covid in hospitalized patients, is that the infection typically becomes the worst about a week into the infection after the viral load has dropped and the patient system (because the immune system has eliminated the virus). Many people theorize this was because the immune system eliminating the virus caused a large number of spike proteins to be released into the body.