It's worth remembering that studies we have show no significant effect on respiratory diseases from mask wearing. If we are happy to accept those studies as proof that the requirement for masks is/was nonsense, we probably also should accept that they don't seem to cause a statistically significant increase in either infection or severity of respiratory disease either.
I read that in mask adhering cities, double the hospitalisation rate was observed than in mask rejcting cities. When other parameters matched as "twins".
As the mask has cost:benefit 20:1, see above, it was of vital importance to eliminate all possible studies that could "endanger" the sole narrative.
I also had, after astra CoV shot, the worst lung illness in my life, nearly killing me, and after I barely could get one flight of stairs again, I tried doing this in a shopping mall, where I was required to mask. After one flight, I was fainting. Had to breathe in deeply , and out, deliberately pressing as good as I could. And bend formwards. So if you are on the verge of tipping over, the additional small volume of CO2 can really make a difference.
And I used a PTFE based mask, having the least possible pressure drop whil NOT binding water, that in turn binds CO2.
All PE PES masks are horrible in that respect.
Also, they soak fast, and then their effect to bind aerosol particles by adherent humidity turns into your enemy: they release the up-concentrated pathogens and produce an alveolar reaching AEROSOL themselves when breathing in.
To pict the consequences of AEROSOLS of pathogens you had on nasal or throat mucosa:
The correct usage manual would state:
IMMEDIATELY after sneezing or coughing, take down mask and spray a lung tolerable inorganic antiseptic to insides to disinfect possible pathogens to prevent instant deep lungs infection.
And I was a mask fanatic back then, innovating how to use shrink foil to introduce a window where we could see our mouths, hifi audio capable, as shrink foil is too thin to distort sound. As I was constantly thinking of children searching facial expression in their caretakers, and of the hearing impaired, lip reading depending persons. What horrors they must face in a masked world. And indeed, someone measured EQ thus IQ 3% down.
Used double layer shrink wrap foil on a wire frame to test audio properties. Imagined how to wrap it around some nylon wire "backbone". Etc.
Well, the little word "lung tolerable inorganic antiseptic" offers a much more elegant solution: virtual maks, just take care you emit only non-replicating pathogens, donating pre-immunity by nK based innate antibody training. After 3 rounds, you may benefit from sterilising immunity with or without ever having been ill. Like teachers and kindergarten workers, that were measured to have only 1/10 ths of CoV infections of normal people. As they have a highly trained (mucosal) immunity, nK high, and cross immunity (other corona viruses like OC43 etc), and get a lot of aerosols, perhaps from some recovered CoV patients as well.
Aerosols are the messenger of "get immune". Without the load of sickness. That comes by droplets.
You would think that would be a pretty obvious question wouldn't you?
Not to mention the bacterial and fungal colonies that come wtih those obscene face coverings.
And how about the toxic fibers that make up those blue masks going into the lungs?
It's worth remembering that studies we have show no significant effect on respiratory diseases from mask wearing. If we are happy to accept those studies as proof that the requirement for masks is/was nonsense, we probably also should accept that they don't seem to cause a statistically significant increase in either infection or severity of respiratory disease either.
I read that in mask adhering cities, double the hospitalisation rate was observed than in mask rejcting cities. When other parameters matched as "twins".
As the mask has cost:benefit 20:1, see above, it was of vital importance to eliminate all possible studies that could "endanger" the sole narrative.
I also had, after astra CoV shot, the worst lung illness in my life, nearly killing me, and after I barely could get one flight of stairs again, I tried doing this in a shopping mall, where I was required to mask. After one flight, I was fainting. Had to breathe in deeply , and out, deliberately pressing as good as I could. And bend formwards. So if you are on the verge of tipping over, the additional small volume of CO2 can really make a difference.
And I used a PTFE based mask, having the least possible pressure drop whil NOT binding water, that in turn binds CO2.
All PE PES masks are horrible in that respect.
Also, they soak fast, and then their effect to bind aerosol particles by adherent humidity turns into your enemy: they release the up-concentrated pathogens and produce an alveolar reaching AEROSOL themselves when breathing in.
To pict the consequences of AEROSOLS of pathogens you had on nasal or throat mucosa:
The correct usage manual would state:
IMMEDIATELY after sneezing or coughing, take down mask and spray a lung tolerable inorganic antiseptic to insides to disinfect possible pathogens to prevent instant deep lungs infection.
And I was a mask fanatic back then, innovating how to use shrink foil to introduce a window where we could see our mouths, hifi audio capable, as shrink foil is too thin to distort sound. As I was constantly thinking of children searching facial expression in their caretakers, and of the hearing impaired, lip reading depending persons. What horrors they must face in a masked world. And indeed, someone measured EQ thus IQ 3% down.
Used double layer shrink wrap foil on a wire frame to test audio properties. Imagined how to wrap it around some nylon wire "backbone". Etc.
Well, the little word "lung tolerable inorganic antiseptic" offers a much more elegant solution: virtual maks, just take care you emit only non-replicating pathogens, donating pre-immunity by nK based innate antibody training. After 3 rounds, you may benefit from sterilising immunity with or without ever having been ill. Like teachers and kindergarten workers, that were measured to have only 1/10 ths of CoV infections of normal people. As they have a highly trained (mucosal) immunity, nK high, and cross immunity (other corona viruses like OC43 etc), and get a lot of aerosols, perhaps from some recovered CoV patients as well.
Aerosols are the messenger of "get immune". Without the load of sickness. That comes by droplets.