No, I didn't say that. Only that they may have tested with the wrong method of infection. There was an American cheese with the German sounding name of Leiderkrantz, which was originally created in 1891, as an American re-creation of Limburger cheese. I just found a source for its history which says that it was purchase by Borden in 1929, who owned it when I first remember eating it. A lot of this history I just discovered now on the Wikipedia entry: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liederkranz_cheese
In 1981 a fire damaged the plant it was made at, and Borden sold it to another company who started producing it a few months later. This part I'm about to mention isn't in the Wikipedia article, but I remember at the time a news article about it. The new company mixed the culture into the batches when they tried to produce the cheese again, but it didn't come out right. They realized that it had to be cultured through airborne particles, so they smeared stock of the existing cheese on the walls of the factory, and that created the culture in the cheese they were producing. Back to Wikipedia-- However about four years later there was a bacterial contamination of some sort and they withdrew it from the market. The rights to the cheese and the cultures went through several ownerships, and I didn't realize till now that another company had started producing it again in 2010, after 25 years. Some doubted that the bacterial cultures would last that long, but apparently it worked. I used to like like the cheese--it wasn't as strong as Limburger and it had a unique flavor.
Isn't the traditional understanding of infection is that you end up inundated with a large viral load of pathogenic viruses? Even if we buy this theory of toxicity it does not appear that they tested the theory out with a large group of subjects and adequate controls. The so-called novel SAR-COV-2 virus was never linked to a myriad of sick people in the real world utilizing EM images. Anyway that's my impression. I would imagine to do so would jeopardize their entire theory and program. No the "pandemic" was 'certified" through the specious results of PCR tests that do not measure so-called infection.
And I'm supposed to shiver in my boots because they want me to be afraid of the big bad virus? F-ck them!
No, I didn't say that. Only that they may have tested with the wrong method of infection. There was an American cheese with the German sounding name of Leiderkrantz, which was originally created in 1891, as an American re-creation of Limburger cheese. I just found a source for its history which says that it was purchase by Borden in 1929, who owned it when I first remember eating it. A lot of this history I just discovered now on the Wikipedia entry: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liederkranz_cheese
In 1981 a fire damaged the plant it was made at, and Borden sold it to another company who started producing it a few months later. This part I'm about to mention isn't in the Wikipedia article, but I remember at the time a news article about it. The new company mixed the culture into the batches when they tried to produce the cheese again, but it didn't come out right. They realized that it had to be cultured through airborne particles, so they smeared stock of the existing cheese on the walls of the factory, and that created the culture in the cheese they were producing. Back to Wikipedia-- However about four years later there was a bacterial contamination of some sort and they withdrew it from the market. The rights to the cheese and the cultures went through several ownerships, and I didn't realize till now that another company had started producing it again in 2010, after 25 years. Some doubted that the bacterial cultures would last that long, but apparently it worked. I used to like like the cheese--it wasn't as strong as Limburger and it had a unique flavor.
Isn't the traditional understanding of infection is that you end up inundated with a large viral load of pathogenic viruses? Even if we buy this theory of toxicity it does not appear that they tested the theory out with a large group of subjects and adequate controls. The so-called novel SAR-COV-2 virus was never linked to a myriad of sick people in the real world utilizing EM images. Anyway that's my impression. I would imagine to do so would jeopardize their entire theory and program. No the "pandemic" was 'certified" through the specious results of PCR tests that do not measure so-called infection.
Infection can be of viruses, bacteria, or fungus. In the case of athletes foot, toes have been heard to cry out, "A fungus is among us!"