Be a skeptic, have an open mind; there is no substantive data at present that CO2 is correlated with temperature records, and the whole notion of mean surface temperatures at localized places all over a globe (with polar caps and an eccentric, precessing orbital path around its heat source) is absurd. Something melted the glaciers 20000 …
Be a skeptic, have an open mind; there is no substantive data at present that CO2 is correlated with temperature records, and the whole notion of mean surface temperatures at localized places all over a globe (with polar caps and an eccentric, precessing orbital path around its heat source) is absurd. Something melted the glaciers 20000 yrs ago, and it wasn't the internal combustion engine. It's really not complicated regarding the broader picture. It would be helpful if most so called "climate scientists" knew anything about thermodynamics .
Be a skeptic, have an open mind; there is no substantive data at present that CO2 is correlated with temperature records, and the whole notion of mean surface temperatures at localized places all over a globe (with polar caps and an eccentric, precessing orbital path around its heat source) is absurd. Something melted the glaciers 20000 yrs ago, and it wasn't the internal combustion engine. It's really not complicated regarding the broader picture. It would be helpful if most so called "climate scientists" knew anything about thermodynamics .