It's outrageous that they have finally admitted what women all over the country knew from the first month: these jabs disrupt menstrual cycles -- and yet, they still say it's safe. They haven't performed longer term studies on these jabs for women's health or for the impact on reproduction. And they still say it's safe. They don't know that. But they still say it's safe. They have destroyed their credibility. What a bunch of assholes.
Steph... I suggest you read Naomi's pre-2008 articles. These are feminist and elitist. One does not change position overnight. This is glaringly a recruitment to globalisation Plan B, wherein courageous citizens emerge to defeat and destroy the democidal maniacs like Fauci, Schwarb and Gates. You, the adoring, grateful and gullible public, then trust the New Leaders and, singing joyously and peacefully, follow them to a new series of death camps.
I have a growing list of suspects but you really need to do your own homework and identify which Leaders and Resistance Websites are faux.
If you do not, I am philosphical. I have long ago reconciled myself to the deaths of billions who are too lazy to think, too timid to question, and too spineless to challenge. But, so sad about their children.
Naomi has changed. I give her credit. She has been at the forefront of informing people about the reproductive harms by these shots, as well as about the removal of freedoms and autonomy masquerading as public health.
Some people are susceptible to blindly following people, but then there are those of us who do anything but.
I'm old enough to have known about Naomi Wolf for several decades now. She drove me right around the bend with her "liberal" politics, government is the answer, including the use of force to achieve her preferred outcomes. She absolutely made me crazy...
And then a few years back, I began to notice that she was noticing that hey, all this government sh*t is going sideways here...(Anyone could have predicted that, Naomi.) and I'm not sure I like it. We'd better put the brakes on...
I do get what you're saying, Steph, but I do also think that Naomi has changed -- a lot. Sure, it could be phony, but for now, I'll give her the benefit of the doubt and credit for what appears to be a complete 180 change: Government sucks. It always has, always will, and with rare, rare exception those in that crime syndicate, elected and unelected, also suck and represent a danger to all that is good and decent.
Why not appraise the merits of Naomi's current arguments rather than mount an ad hominem attack on her. If she defends past female supremacist or misandristic, gynocentric and elitist positions now, which I've not observed her doing, then address those arguments where warranted but why try to discredit good work that she has been doing lately which has nothing to do with female supremacism or misandry?
She never did espouse Dworkin-style female supremacy. Her 'feminist' work tends toward the examination of stereotypes and how this affects women's view of themselves and their bodies. I don't see how that is radical other than talking about how women interact with a society that is now completely warped in it's view of 'normal womanhood'.
Because, unlike you, I focus on the bullet headed my way, not on the industrial history of the gun that fired it. Be aware, your psuedonym exposes you as delusional.
An ad hominem attack? I'll stick to examining the merits of her arguments and leave the sophistry to others. When others engage in fallacious arguments to attack her, it just makes her look so much better than them in comparison.
There are plenty of far more extreme female supremacists than it appears she might have been when younger. I don't recall reading her past writings, and probably never did because ISMs don't interest me. Even if she does still hold her past opinions, she is, as Raptor says, right on this account. Further, it is unlikely that she has not modified her opinions at least somewhat, and having a go at her for her past opinions could be, although I am not religious, like attacking Paul after his conversion on the road to Damascus for what he did when he was Saul. There is nothing good to be served by people-rating or downing her. The "self" changes every day. None of us are perfect. Let's leave the casting of stones to he who is without sin.
I bet you and I don't agree on everything, yet I bet we would lock arms to fight against medical tyranny. In some ways I think at least her feminist ideals mesh with not wanting to put the experimental jab in her body. It is about body autonomy. She just has it wrong about abortion since there are two bodies in that case.
If she is fake, then she has taken that position at great personal and reputational (with her group) expense. Plus her work and the work of people in her group has been stellar.
You can, of course, consider people who think she is doing good work on the jab spineless. But us poor old invertebrates will just merrily MARCH on. Be careful of the philosophy you hitch your wagon to.
LOL. Not you. Probably Tony. I'm glad you asked. My ticket was stamped, I just missed the train. I was probably banging on the vending machine trying to unhitch the snickers from the slot or something. Yes, It was Tony. Tony if you are reading this - the other message was meant for you if you care. Haha. Het maybe someone jabbed me when I wasn't lookin. Next thing ya know I will crave mask wearing and spend my days public denouncing of Ivermectin.
They performed more rigorous studies on tampons before they started letting women use them.
In the trial they did tell women not to get pregnant or for anyone to touch the jab material. Of course they did and their babies died. But... overpopulation so - all is well is Dystopiaville.
Yeah - and it'll be worth what? Unless you take the pricks and go digital, you can get all of the money that you want but it'll only pile up in the mattress or in the closet. Maybe we can stuff our mattresses when we get too much and can't buy another?
Of course they are! But dear Anon, remember... how did the bunch of assholes behave? Did they act logically, protective to people or showed you ANY other acts of behaviour YOU should have shown when you were in their shoes? ANY behaviour proving they want to save people instead of killing them? EVER?
No they didn't! So do they now? Or tomorrow?
No they don't! I cannot say it enough, and it is really bad news to people who haven't really thought about this yet, but, is very important knowledge about the people who are destroying our society, our country, OUR lives, as if we are their property!
People who are capable of thinking that way, and not feel if they have to kill themselves because they act like satan itself, are not just one day like satan, and the next day they know how people must be respectfully represented en cared for....
No, the next day they are still like satan! And if that would be differently, from one day on the other: there is even a more serious problem I guess...
LMAO!!! How exactly does that sperm get inserted? ;) Where do those eggs come from? If they came from inside the person, that's not a man. I know you are kidding, but really... I agree with the clowns, even the one on the SCOTUS - Ugh!
I know right? Menstrual cycle disturbances. LNPs in ovaries and breast milk. Miscarriages.
"Go right ahead ladies. Step on up and get your jabs."
It’s only the females they don’t want to reproduce.
It's outrageous that they have finally admitted what women all over the country knew from the first month: these jabs disrupt menstrual cycles -- and yet, they still say it's safe. They haven't performed longer term studies on these jabs for women's health or for the impact on reproduction. And they still say it's safe. They don't know that. But they still say it's safe. They have destroyed their credibility. What a bunch of assholes.
Naomi Wolf has consistently reported on this since day 1. Breastfeeding babies are dying from jabbed mothers. Miscarriages aplenty.
Steph... I suggest you read Naomi's pre-2008 articles. These are feminist and elitist. One does not change position overnight. This is glaringly a recruitment to globalisation Plan B, wherein courageous citizens emerge to defeat and destroy the democidal maniacs like Fauci, Schwarb and Gates. You, the adoring, grateful and gullible public, then trust the New Leaders and, singing joyously and peacefully, follow them to a new series of death camps.
I have a growing list of suspects but you really need to do your own homework and identify which Leaders and Resistance Websites are faux.
If you do not, I am philosphical. I have long ago reconciled myself to the deaths of billions who are too lazy to think, too timid to question, and too spineless to challenge. But, so sad about their children.
Naomi has changed. I give her credit. She has been at the forefront of informing people about the reproductive harms by these shots, as well as about the removal of freedoms and autonomy masquerading as public health.
On this she seems rather clear eyed. I read her book. She has suffered mightily for speaking out and now fighting. Respect to her.
I read it too.
Regardless of her past, she seems pretty in tune on this particular subject.
I know she’s is a declared liberal and do not follow anyone blindly.
I have only seen her reporting the last two years and her repeated appearances on the War Room.
Simply making a statement that she reported on this for two years and calling out the mandates and dangers of this poison.
Some people might be susceptible to blindly following people. I’m not one of them.
Some people are susceptible to blindly following people, but then there are those of us who do anything but.
I'm old enough to have known about Naomi Wolf for several decades now. She drove me right around the bend with her "liberal" politics, government is the answer, including the use of force to achieve her preferred outcomes. She absolutely made me crazy...
And then a few years back, I began to notice that she was noticing that hey, all this government sh*t is going sideways here...(Anyone could have predicted that, Naomi.) and I'm not sure I like it. We'd better put the brakes on...
I do get what you're saying, Steph, but I do also think that Naomi has changed -- a lot. Sure, it could be phony, but for now, I'll give her the benefit of the doubt and credit for what appears to be a complete 180 change: Government sucks. It always has, always will, and with rare, rare exception those in that crime syndicate, elected and unelected, also suck and represent a danger to all that is good and decent.
I was hoping you are not. Thanks for replying.
Why not appraise the merits of Naomi's current arguments rather than mount an ad hominem attack on her. If she defends past female supremacist or misandristic, gynocentric and elitist positions now, which I've not observed her doing, then address those arguments where warranted but why try to discredit good work that she has been doing lately which has nothing to do with female supremacism or misandry?
She never did espouse Dworkin-style female supremacy. Her 'feminist' work tends toward the examination of stereotypes and how this affects women's view of themselves and their bodies. I don't see how that is radical other than talking about how women interact with a society that is now completely warped in it's view of 'normal womanhood'.
Because, unlike you, I focus on the bullet headed my way, not on the industrial history of the gun that fired it. Be aware, your psuedonym exposes you as delusional.
An ad hominem attack? I'll stick to examining the merits of her arguments and leave the sophistry to others. When others engage in fallacious arguments to attack her, it just makes her look so much better than them in comparison.
I get the suspicion of Wolf by many people, but I'm with you on crediting her for where she is now vs. the positions she held when "young and stupid".
There are plenty of far more extreme female supremacists than it appears she might have been when younger. I don't recall reading her past writings, and probably never did because ISMs don't interest me. Even if she does still hold her past opinions, she is, as Raptor says, right on this account. Further, it is unlikely that she has not modified her opinions at least somewhat, and having a go at her for her past opinions could be, although I am not religious, like attacking Paul after his conversion on the road to Damascus for what he did when he was Saul. There is nothing good to be served by people-rating or downing her. The "self" changes every day. None of us are perfect. Let's leave the casting of stones to he who is without sin.
Except at the jab pushers.
Throwing stones at them is to be encouraged.
I think she still holds those opinions. But on this account she is right and in the fight. I respect that. Baby remains in the tub.
She might...I don't think so, but you could be right. We'll just have to wait and see. In the meantime, glad the baby's still in the tub. :)
I bet you and I don't agree on everything, yet I bet we would lock arms to fight against medical tyranny. In some ways I think at least her feminist ideals mesh with not wanting to put the experimental jab in her body. It is about body autonomy. She just has it wrong about abortion since there are two bodies in that case.
If she is fake, then she has taken that position at great personal and reputational (with her group) expense. Plus her work and the work of people in her group has been stellar.
You can, of course, consider people who think she is doing good work on the jab spineless. But us poor old invertebrates will just merrily MARCH on. Be careful of the philosophy you hitch your wagon to.
Raptor, who is this response intended for? I think I've lost the train here. 😂
LOL. Not you. Probably Tony. I'm glad you asked. My ticket was stamped, I just missed the train. I was probably banging on the vending machine trying to unhitch the snickers from the slot or something. Yes, It was Tony. Tony if you are reading this - the other message was meant for you if you care. Haha. Het maybe someone jabbed me when I wasn't lookin. Next thing ya know I will crave mask wearing and spend my days public denouncing of Ivermectin.
I digress. Big surprise.
Bravo
Er no, not me.
False leaders is a problem, for sure. Trump is the best example, but there are many more.
What about the children with hepatitis as well - that might be jab realted?
They performed more rigorous studies on tampons before they started letting women use them.
In the trial they did tell women not to get pregnant or for anyone to touch the jab material. Of course they did and their babies died. But... overpopulation so - all is well is Dystopiaville.
I'm sure Big Pharmas answer would be:
"We had to do accelerated trials or more people would have died of COVID."
I think they are already working that lie Shibumi.
Also - Big Pharma and the government answer to no one anymore.
The relationship between Big Pharma, Big Corp and Big Government is interesting.
For example, Pay Pal was talking about fining people $2.500 for speaking out against Big Pharma. They have since backed off.
One hand feeds the other I suppose.
Studies on the jabs aren't scheduled to END until 2024, I believe.
I’m part of the control group and will be selling my unjabbed blood for millions.
Yeah - and it'll be worth what? Unless you take the pricks and go digital, you can get all of the money that you want but it'll only pile up in the mattress or in the closet. Maybe we can stuff our mattresses when we get too much and can't buy another?
They End when we stop taking them!
Of course they are! But dear Anon, remember... how did the bunch of assholes behave? Did they act logically, protective to people or showed you ANY other acts of behaviour YOU should have shown when you were in their shoes? ANY behaviour proving they want to save people instead of killing them? EVER?
No they didn't! So do they now? Or tomorrow?
No they don't! I cannot say it enough, and it is really bad news to people who haven't really thought about this yet, but, is very important knowledge about the people who are destroying our society, our country, OUR lives, as if we are their property!
People who are capable of thinking that way, and not feel if they have to kill themselves because they act like satan itself, are not just one day like satan, and the next day they know how people must be respectfully represented en cared for....
No, the next day they are still like satan! And if that would be differently, from one day on the other: there is even a more serious problem I guess...
👆👆👆👆🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Men can get pregnant too ya know. 🤡
Lol, only in fantasyland.
Yes, and where we live in at the moment...?
LMAO!!! How exactly does that sperm get inserted? ;) Where do those eggs come from? If they came from inside the person, that's not a man. I know you are kidding, but really... I agree with the clowns, even the one on the SCOTUS - Ugh!