Pretty glad I (a female) went into physics and engineering while "The Patriarchy" was still so powerful. Wish I could thank each and every one of the men who helped me reach my goals. And more than a few women thought I was really very weird to think I could be a physicist and weren't afraid to tell me that.
so, you're a scientist? Please read either the summary or the whole thing regarding the nobel prize winning experiments from 1946 and 1954. 1946, Stanley, tobacco mosaic, 1954, enders, polio.
I look at them and am unable to find a control in either of two experiments which have won nobel prizes. Perhaps I am too poorly educated or incapable of paying attention to see it. If you can see the control in Stanley's experiment, please show it to me?
Enders himself said that he had the same result with the control and the variable and "that that would need to be looked at again.
I don't see anything more important than easy picking proof of scientific fraud at the highest levels. This is quite an easy way to demonstrate that the scientific authorities are complete frauds. Are you willing to look at it?
The mob has brainwashed you. These patriarchy lies have also been going on for decades. "Patriarchy and equality" work in practice in such a way that more and more "women" have power in education and families over man and children. Now they are making up rapes to rob men and Bettina Arndt can explain the fake epidemic of rape and domestic violence to you. And look at the control of men by denying "sex". Yes, "women" will destroy everything for the satanic elite. In my life, women have been much more violent towards me than men, and almost all of them.
Look at American society in general now. Broken families, boys lost because no father to bond with. Women told we're victims while given the ability to accuse any man of rape and make it stick with no witnesses and no admission of responsibility of our own. And she's upset because autistic boys are grabbing all the attention. Well take it away, sister.
The problem is even worse because all the ideologies were deliberately created by ultra-rich satanists to destroy the family and both sexes. They are already going above women with the intrusion of artificial transsexuals into their sports. Real men and real women should unite for the survival of humanity and do so on Christian values.
Well. . .maybe not! Christianity is the fake false religion NOT from the Bible began from pagan roots by The Christian Vatican in Rome in The Third Century A.D. The Papacy also started Islam from pagan roots in The Sixth Century A.D.
Add Communism and the Nazis with their crooked cross in The Twentieth Century. Sadly, Christianity and its image (idol) will be "The Mark of the Beast" in Revelation 13:18. I post publicly and freely on MeWe.
"Consigned automatically to a lifetime of disfunction , disability, dependence unhappiness and poverty." Sounds like a perfect description of what being perfectly adjusted to life in the modern world will ultimately lead to. And at the same time, Lydia says that for some of us getting our ASD diagnosis so that we can access (at a price, of course)
a "better developmental trajectory" ("Better" for who??) replete with all the therapie$ and re$ource$ and med$ and all $ort$ of modalitie$ to help us fit in "BETTER" to the plans the planned modern culture has for us forced into the niche to which they wish to consign us, rather than allow us to develop our unique God given talents, interests and abilities as these unfold in the course of life.
Maybe, say, Emily Dickinson was "on the spectrum" ; without her treatment plan was she automatically consigned to the horrifically bleak life prognosticated for her without all the "MUST HAVE" products the Autistic Spectrum Industry deems necessary for her to have a fulfilling life. Without which she is automatically doomed to a life of disability, disfunction, dependence, unhappiness, poverty, misery, lack of social skills, etc, etc.
In their judgement Her volumes of magnificent poetry would never have been enough.
This might be a contributing factor, but not THE reason for higher rates of autism in boys. The real reason is that the developing brains react differently to inflammatory/oxidative insults in male vs female fetuses (or babies). There are v precise mechanisms at play at the cellular level, many of which are already known. It would make for a looong post (I may attempt it later) but let's just say that an immune stressor/inflammation during early stages of brain development will have different long term consequences in brain energy metabolism, which will in turn affect brain function/processing of information (especially in high level, high energy demand situations such as social interaction) in males vs females.
You make a very good point - but it's more relevant for when the kids are perhaps 4-7 years old. This study looked at developmental milestones @ 12-mths & 18-mths. Typically, that's way too early to test for ASD.
As an example, my firstborn is Aspie (like her maternal grandmother!). She didn't crawl until after 9 months, but she walked by 12 & 1/2 months. Her speech was also fantastic - and early (yet another common girl vs boy issue!). She got tested for ASD when she was almost 7. We were pretty sure she was ASD by then...
But it makes me wonder what exactly IS going on here...because these study results show some major problems, with large discrepancies between the sexes...
Hey Robyn, We thought our eldest daughter might be aspie too (another new word for me) but in UK it seems the general idea that it is more difficult to spot in females and lots get diagnosed in early twenties. She ended up as Borderline Personality Disorder, whatever that is...
Here's an idea: just don't take the $tab$hots, whether pregnant at any stage or not pregnant. Havent people figured out yet that there are some unfortunate consequences for participating in that racket which is not designed to benefit you but to enrich the coffers of the predatory profiteers? Which includes many in the field of "Psychiatric Medicine." Go down that road at your own risk
It is beyond their comprehension that the white coat 'gods' could possibly ever have any other motive than to be there just for their total convenience and well being. But once you know, you know...
Hiya! Funny you should mention BPD. For years, a psychologist and I thought my Mum was BPD...but it turns out she's just Asperger's! When my oldest was diagnosed as ASD Level 1 (ie Asperger's), everything clicked into place. Their 'issues' all made sense to us. They were still horrible issues at times, but we could handle them better. It also helped that I had an admin person working for me at the time whose partner (+ her Dad + her sister!) was Aspie and both their kids were Aspie, too. She was a wealth of knowledge, that woman! Even my Mum said that if my daughter was Aspie, then my firstborn most definitely was, too. Even she could see the striking similarities between herself and her granddaughter!!
I do wonder how many women - especially - are diagnosed with BPD when in fact they might be Asperger's? BPD is pretty weird when you think about it, and a lot of traits are very similar to Asperger's. Your daughter might want to consider getting a second or even a third opinion on that diagnosis, Marc. Just my two cents worth, anyway :-)
There's that book: "Stop walking on eggshells" by Mason & Kreger. It's supposedly about taking your life back from someone who has BPD. However, when you re-read that knowing the person has Asperger's instead, it makes a helluva lot more sense!
Sometimes I think people have not labelled Asperger's, or even Autism, properly, and that one day things are going to be classified in better ways that make a lot more sense. I guess we're all still learning, and the diagnoses we currently use are OK - for now. But I still think we're missing a few links in that knowledge base.
Anyway, YES, female Asperger's/ASD traits, just like with ADHD/ADD, can present quite differently. It's not exactly unexpected, given men are quite different from women, not just physically, but in brain patterns, too!! :-D My Mum once answered a quiz from "Why men don't listen and women can't read maps" by Allan & Barbara Pease, and she ended up as having a 'male' brain. However, she also said that when she was younger, she would've answered some of those questions differently. I guess being a single Aspie Mum certainly took a toll on her through life!! :-\
Personally I take any and all psych diagnoses with a huge pinch of salt. I recently read Cracked by James Davies which details the history of psychiatry since the 50s, including the jump in mental disorders from 106 to around 370 today. It records the history of the DSM, their diagnostic manual, which is an absolute farce - they seem to make it up as they go along - a bunch of psych dudes sat round a table in USA and whoever shouts loudest gets their way. Mind you, they do sell $5 Million worth of manuals around the world per annum... Then, of course, the pHarma sharks rush in with drugs - for every conceivable issue. Another absolute criminal farce!
PS Your dear mum seems to have done very well by you.
PPS Our daughter refuses to acknowledge that we, her stupid parents who allegedly ruined her life, could possibly know anything and totally rejects any help or support we offer. We have just had to accept it, whilst keeping in contact so that she knows we are always here and ready to help if she needs us. So sad...
Thank you. Trouble is she's been on their poisons for five years already so who knows what that has done to fry her brain. And the last consult she had was with a psych 250 miles away so had to be done on Zoom. But hey, that's the UK's totally underfunded NHS for you. The mental health waiting lists are horrendous - and getting even worse.
Someone may have already pointed this out in this comments field, but boys generally suffer from more neurodevelopment disease than females. Boys, of course, have XY chromosomes vs. the female XX, and this basically means that girls have two chances to get certain genes right; whereas, boys, though they have many homologous genes on the Y, don't have a backup gene for all of those expressed on the X chromosome. In other words, they have higher rate of having a misfunctioning gene than a female.
As Igor shows so well in his graph, the findings from this study were all over the place, so much so that it the authors had no business drawing any sort of conclusion, let alone to suggest that this study shows that Covid vaccination during pregnancy does not impact neurodevelopment of the fetus.
How can we tell which babies are boys and which are girls before they turn 4 and have the ability to come out as trans? Aren't we being a bit presumptuous?
There are multiple things that the medical establishment is doing during "prenatal care" and hospital birth that can and do result in brain damage in the children, especially boys. Newborn circumcision, for example, because it is done with absolutely no anesthetic whatsoever 96% of the time, causes massive trauma to the boys. Studies have shown that the male brain never goes back to its baseline configuration after this genital torture and mutilation which, BTW, is 100% cosmetic and has no medical benefits whatsoever. Please see my book, "Birth Trauma and the Dark Side of Modern Medicine", for more info about that: https://birthofanewearth.com/2019/04/birth-trauma-and-the-dark-side-of-modern-medicine/
Furthermore, prenatal ultrasound (about which I have written a very important book: https://birthofanewearth.com/2019/04/the-dark-side-of-prenatal-ultrasound/) also causes brain damage (as well as DNA damage, fertility damage, and much much more). Ultrasound, which is better described as ultrasonic irradiation, involves the electroshock torture of developing babies. This can be easily confirmed by studies such as the one done by Munawwar Husain et al, entitled High Frequency Ultrasound Torturer, published in the Journal of the Indian Medical Association, Dec 2009, Vol 107(12): 884, 886, 891-2, which states: "The discernible aim of torture…is to destroy the personality of an individual in a way that would render his compliance in [the] future… [To this end], discreet methods may be employed to selectively destroy areas in [the] brain by high dosage and high frequency ultrasound… It is presumed that the individual would acquire complete docility and be subservient. He would not be in a position to articulate his thoughts and emotions… Surgeons and physicians utilize this information, in certain cases, to control human behavior. Intracranial diagnostic use of ultrasound is possible only in neonates and infants through the opening of fontanelle… With active co-operation and participation of doctors… selective areas in the brain can be destroyed by high-frequency ultrasound."
And there is a study done by S.P. Hicks, et al, entitled "How to design and build abnormal brains using radiation during development", ORINS Rep US At Energy Comm. 1960 Jun:6159:1-28, which pretty much tells us all we need to know about how the radiation babies are being exposed to in the womb through ultrasound and through parental use of wireless devices, can trigger (and is INTENDED to trigger) brain damage and neurodevelopmental dysfunction.
The COVID "vaccine" involves injecting people with wireless nanotechnology that literally turns them into walking wireless devices. It is THE RADIATION from the wireless frequencies inside their bodies that is causing so many deaths and injuries, including in newborn babies and children. And it has been known for many decades that baby boys are more vulnerable. For example, see here: https://www.calendar-australia.com/faq/are-baby-boys-more-fragile-than-baby-girls
The point I am making here is that there are multiple attacks coming from the medical establishment and also from our wireless way of life that are designed to destroy the children - especially boys. The powers-that-shouldn't-be do not appreciate male potency as it is a direct threat to their control. Hence, they do everything they can to undermine male power, making up phrases such as "toxic masculinity" and promoting transgenderism and the genital mutilation of children.
It's time for people to see things as they really are. The medical establishment is NOT your friend and this has been so for at least 100 years. Human children have never been this sick or disabled and hence, if we do not change gears very soon, billions of bloodlines will go extinct.
I have two nieces 28 and 19. Both seemed very "normal" as kids. They both started having "unexplained" health issues at 15 and 12. Both now have many health issues AND gender nonconforming. Could be on the spectrum as well? I'm sure their moms were following all ob/gyn and pediatric recommendations. They are the new normal. Every single child injected pre birth or after is injured. You don't need studies to see what is in front of you.
Please see my comment above Kat Bro, as prenatal exposure to ultrasound (combined with parental use of wireless devices) is also causing massive harm to the children. Radiation damage is often latent -- showing up years after the first exposure. This includes problems like cancers, brain tumors, sterility, etc.
I wonder if all the children and adults in this study had the same immunizations history's from birth prior to parents or children getting the COVID vaccine. Could it be possible that previous vaccines combined with COVID vaccine are causing medical, phycological, and death results in children and adults? This would also account for the all the differences in age groups from very old to very young because vaccines and regiments have changed so much especially since the early 1900's.
Everyone, just remember a set variables in a scientific equation, static and hypothesis is the key to the results you want achieve. If you use the right set variables, you can make an elephant hang from a cliff by blade grass.
Would it have been even worse for the vaxx-exposed cohort of this study if they had been studied at 6 months and 3 months of age? Did more in the vax-exposed group die off in the earlier months, so that only healthier ones were left by 18 months, giving an illusion of benefit at 18 months?
The Highwire has followed this topic more closely then any other news organization or group. I would trust that they will be very honest and thorough in their review of the study. (They put out news every Thursday and it is legit.)
I had a thought while reading this, we have people within society who have no problems killing babies in the womb, are these the same people deciding if the vaccines are safe or not?
I remember being surprised when some of the formulations from doctors looking to diminish the damage from Covid or the shots included drugs to reduce androgens. According to one study done at Columbia University's Institute For Genomic Research, to enter human cells the spike protein binds to two proteins, ACE2 (which I thought was an enzyme?) and TMPRSS2. Lowering testosterone reduces the number of TMPRSS2 receptors. So there may be a gender-associated pathway by which the spike protein affects cells, that disproportionately affects male fetus development.
My understanding is that the Covid vaccine hi-jacks ones immune system and uses up extra hormones, so you have less free testosterone than normal. Adequate hormones are needed for the fetus to develop normally, and I am not surprised that the most damage to the fetus is caused by vaccinations in the first trimester of pregnancy. Pregnant women have reduced immunity, so the hormone deficit caused by vaccinating in the 1st trimester, may continue to impair normal fetal development in 2nd and 3rd trimester. It goes to show how important adequate hormones are in normal development, and this vaccination effect during pregnancy should come as no surprise.
It is very strange about the higher risk in vaccine-exposed at 12 months and the lower risk at 18 months. I'm wondering if these are completely separate groups, or if it is the same group tested six months apart. If it is the same group tested six months apart, is it possible that the worst-affected kids could have died in the interim, or been unable to participate in the testing at 18 months? Of course the study glosses over the biggest and simplest question: how many pregnancies ended up producing alive kids at, say, age 18 months, vaxxed vs unvaxxed.
Simon Baron-Cohen (Sacha’s cousin!) posits that the people with autism have an extreme male brain.
Pretty glad I (a female) went into physics and engineering while "The Patriarchy" was still so powerful. Wish I could thank each and every one of the men who helped me reach my goals. And more than a few women thought I was really very weird to think I could be a physicist and weren't afraid to tell me that.
so, you're a scientist? Please read either the summary or the whole thing regarding the nobel prize winning experiments from 1946 and 1954. 1946, Stanley, tobacco mosaic, 1954, enders, polio.
I look at them and am unable to find a control in either of two experiments which have won nobel prizes. Perhaps I am too poorly educated or incapable of paying attention to see it. If you can see the control in Stanley's experiment, please show it to me?
Enders himself said that he had the same result with the control and the variable and "that that would need to be looked at again.
I don't see anything more important than easy picking proof of scientific fraud at the highest levels. This is quite an easy way to demonstrate that the scientific authorities are complete frauds. Are you willing to look at it?
The mob has brainwashed you. These patriarchy lies have also been going on for decades. "Patriarchy and equality" work in practice in such a way that more and more "women" have power in education and families over man and children. Now they are making up rapes to rob men and Bettina Arndt can explain the fake epidemic of rape and domestic violence to you. And look at the control of men by denying "sex". Yes, "women" will destroy everything for the satanic elite. In my life, women have been much more violent towards me than men, and almost all of them.
Look at American society in general now. Broken families, boys lost because no father to bond with. Women told we're victims while given the ability to accuse any man of rape and make it stick with no witnesses and no admission of responsibility of our own. And she's upset because autistic boys are grabbing all the attention. Well take it away, sister.
The problem is even worse because all the ideologies were deliberately created by ultra-rich satanists to destroy the family and both sexes. They are already going above women with the intrusion of artificial transsexuals into their sports. Real men and real women should unite for the survival of humanity and do so on Christian values.
Well. . .maybe not! Christianity is the fake false religion NOT from the Bible began from pagan roots by The Christian Vatican in Rome in The Third Century A.D. The Papacy also started Islam from pagan roots in The Sixth Century A.D.
Add Communism and the Nazis with their crooked cross in The Twentieth Century. Sadly, Christianity and its image (idol) will be "The Mark of the Beast" in Revelation 13:18. I post publicly and freely on MeWe.
ETERNAL LIFE BLESSINGS FOR YAHWEH'S SAINTS! 🙏
"Consigned automatically to a lifetime of disfunction , disability, dependence unhappiness and poverty." Sounds like a perfect description of what being perfectly adjusted to life in the modern world will ultimately lead to. And at the same time, Lydia says that for some of us getting our ASD diagnosis so that we can access (at a price, of course)
a "better developmental trajectory" ("Better" for who??) replete with all the therapie$ and re$ource$ and med$ and all $ort$ of modalitie$ to help us fit in "BETTER" to the plans the planned modern culture has for us forced into the niche to which they wish to consign us, rather than allow us to develop our unique God given talents, interests and abilities as these unfold in the course of life.
Maybe, say, Emily Dickinson was "on the spectrum" ; without her treatment plan was she automatically consigned to the horrifically bleak life prognosticated for her without all the "MUST HAVE" products the Autistic Spectrum Industry deems necessary for her to have a fulfilling life. Without which she is automatically doomed to a life of disability, disfunction, dependence, unhappiness, poverty, misery, lack of social skills, etc, etc.
In their judgement Her volumes of magnificent poetry would never have been enough.
Igor will come along and POOF your spamming posts.
And I will laugh.
done
This might be a contributing factor, but not THE reason for higher rates of autism in boys. The real reason is that the developing brains react differently to inflammatory/oxidative insults in male vs female fetuses (or babies). There are v precise mechanisms at play at the cellular level, many of which are already known. It would make for a looong post (I may attempt it later) but let's just say that an immune stressor/inflammation during early stages of brain development will have different long term consequences in brain energy metabolism, which will in turn affect brain function/processing of information (especially in high level, high energy demand situations such as social interaction) in males vs females.
It's all in here https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qiChZBkjFEK4XGu-QFIw8xS2oWXxNrZq/view?usp=drive_link
You make a very good point - but it's more relevant for when the kids are perhaps 4-7 years old. This study looked at developmental milestones @ 12-mths & 18-mths. Typically, that's way too early to test for ASD.
As an example, my firstborn is Aspie (like her maternal grandmother!). She didn't crawl until after 9 months, but she walked by 12 & 1/2 months. Her speech was also fantastic - and early (yet another common girl vs boy issue!). She got tested for ASD when she was almost 7. We were pretty sure she was ASD by then...
But it makes me wonder what exactly IS going on here...because these study results show some major problems, with large discrepancies between the sexes...
Hey Robyn, We thought our eldest daughter might be aspie too (another new word for me) but in UK it seems the general idea that it is more difficult to spot in females and lots get diagnosed in early twenties. She ended up as Borderline Personality Disorder, whatever that is...
Here's an idea: just don't take the $tab$hots, whether pregnant at any stage or not pregnant. Havent people figured out yet that there are some unfortunate consequences for participating in that racket which is not designed to benefit you but to enrich the coffers of the predatory profiteers? Which includes many in the field of "Psychiatric Medicine." Go down that road at your own risk
It is beyond their comprehension that the white coat 'gods' could possibly ever have any other motive than to be there just for their total convenience and well being. But once you know, you know...
Hiya! Funny you should mention BPD. For years, a psychologist and I thought my Mum was BPD...but it turns out she's just Asperger's! When my oldest was diagnosed as ASD Level 1 (ie Asperger's), everything clicked into place. Their 'issues' all made sense to us. They were still horrible issues at times, but we could handle them better. It also helped that I had an admin person working for me at the time whose partner (+ her Dad + her sister!) was Aspie and both their kids were Aspie, too. She was a wealth of knowledge, that woman! Even my Mum said that if my daughter was Aspie, then my firstborn most definitely was, too. Even she could see the striking similarities between herself and her granddaughter!!
I do wonder how many women - especially - are diagnosed with BPD when in fact they might be Asperger's? BPD is pretty weird when you think about it, and a lot of traits are very similar to Asperger's. Your daughter might want to consider getting a second or even a third opinion on that diagnosis, Marc. Just my two cents worth, anyway :-)
There's that book: "Stop walking on eggshells" by Mason & Kreger. It's supposedly about taking your life back from someone who has BPD. However, when you re-read that knowing the person has Asperger's instead, it makes a helluva lot more sense!
Sometimes I think people have not labelled Asperger's, or even Autism, properly, and that one day things are going to be classified in better ways that make a lot more sense. I guess we're all still learning, and the diagnoses we currently use are OK - for now. But I still think we're missing a few links in that knowledge base.
Anyway, YES, female Asperger's/ASD traits, just like with ADHD/ADD, can present quite differently. It's not exactly unexpected, given men are quite different from women, not just physically, but in brain patterns, too!! :-D My Mum once answered a quiz from "Why men don't listen and women can't read maps" by Allan & Barbara Pease, and she ended up as having a 'male' brain. However, she also said that when she was younger, she would've answered some of those questions differently. I guess being a single Aspie Mum certainly took a toll on her through life!! :-\
Personally I take any and all psych diagnoses with a huge pinch of salt. I recently read Cracked by James Davies which details the history of psychiatry since the 50s, including the jump in mental disorders from 106 to around 370 today. It records the history of the DSM, their diagnostic manual, which is an absolute farce - they seem to make it up as they go along - a bunch of psych dudes sat round a table in USA and whoever shouts loudest gets their way. Mind you, they do sell $5 Million worth of manuals around the world per annum... Then, of course, the pHarma sharks rush in with drugs - for every conceivable issue. Another absolute criminal farce!
PS Your dear mum seems to have done very well by you.
PPS Our daughter refuses to acknowledge that we, her stupid parents who allegedly ruined her life, could possibly know anything and totally rejects any help or support we offer. We have just had to accept it, whilst keeping in contact so that she knows we are always here and ready to help if she needs us. So sad...
Thank you. Trouble is she's been on their poisons for five years already so who knows what that has done to fry her brain. And the last consult she had was with a psych 250 miles away so had to be done on Zoom. But hey, that's the UK's totally underfunded NHS for you. The mental health waiting lists are horrendous - and getting even worse.
Pinned - Great point
Another great article, but I see a minor mistake: "Why are children...", should be "Why do children".
Someone may have already pointed this out in this comments field, but boys generally suffer from more neurodevelopment disease than females. Boys, of course, have XY chromosomes vs. the female XX, and this basically means that girls have two chances to get certain genes right; whereas, boys, though they have many homologous genes on the Y, don't have a backup gene for all of those expressed on the X chromosome. In other words, they have higher rate of having a misfunctioning gene than a female.
Wow, very strange. Maybe with boys it is to sterilize them pre-puberty?
I wrote a shorter and less comprehensive report on this same "study" a few days ago:
Study Pretends to Show Covid Vaccination During Pregnancy Does Not Impact Neurodevelopment of Babies
https://dfoster.substack.com/p/study-pretends-to-show-covid-vaccination
As Igor shows so well in his graph, the findings from this study were all over the place, so much so that it the authors had no business drawing any sort of conclusion, let alone to suggest that this study shows that Covid vaccination during pregnancy does not impact neurodevelopment of the fetus.
How can we tell which babies are boys and which are girls before they turn 4 and have the ability to come out as trans? Aren't we being a bit presumptuous?
iT's ScIeNcE!!!
There are multiple things that the medical establishment is doing during "prenatal care" and hospital birth that can and do result in brain damage in the children, especially boys. Newborn circumcision, for example, because it is done with absolutely no anesthetic whatsoever 96% of the time, causes massive trauma to the boys. Studies have shown that the male brain never goes back to its baseline configuration after this genital torture and mutilation which, BTW, is 100% cosmetic and has no medical benefits whatsoever. Please see my book, "Birth Trauma and the Dark Side of Modern Medicine", for more info about that: https://birthofanewearth.com/2019/04/birth-trauma-and-the-dark-side-of-modern-medicine/
Furthermore, prenatal ultrasound (about which I have written a very important book: https://birthofanewearth.com/2019/04/the-dark-side-of-prenatal-ultrasound/) also causes brain damage (as well as DNA damage, fertility damage, and much much more). Ultrasound, which is better described as ultrasonic irradiation, involves the electroshock torture of developing babies. This can be easily confirmed by studies such as the one done by Munawwar Husain et al, entitled High Frequency Ultrasound Torturer, published in the Journal of the Indian Medical Association, Dec 2009, Vol 107(12): 884, 886, 891-2, which states: "The discernible aim of torture…is to destroy the personality of an individual in a way that would render his compliance in [the] future… [To this end], discreet methods may be employed to selectively destroy areas in [the] brain by high dosage and high frequency ultrasound… It is presumed that the individual would acquire complete docility and be subservient. He would not be in a position to articulate his thoughts and emotions… Surgeons and physicians utilize this information, in certain cases, to control human behavior. Intracranial diagnostic use of ultrasound is possible only in neonates and infants through the opening of fontanelle… With active co-operation and participation of doctors… selective areas in the brain can be destroyed by high-frequency ultrasound."
There is also a youtube video entitled "How Ultrasound Can Deactivate Parts of the Brain": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQhUxd82Rr0
And there is a study done by S.P. Hicks, et al, entitled "How to design and build abnormal brains using radiation during development", ORINS Rep US At Energy Comm. 1960 Jun:6159:1-28, which pretty much tells us all we need to know about how the radiation babies are being exposed to in the womb through ultrasound and through parental use of wireless devices, can trigger (and is INTENDED to trigger) brain damage and neurodevelopmental dysfunction.
The COVID "vaccine" involves injecting people with wireless nanotechnology that literally turns them into walking wireless devices. It is THE RADIATION from the wireless frequencies inside their bodies that is causing so many deaths and injuries, including in newborn babies and children. And it has been known for many decades that baby boys are more vulnerable. For example, see here: https://www.calendar-australia.com/faq/are-baby-boys-more-fragile-than-baby-girls
The point I am making here is that there are multiple attacks coming from the medical establishment and also from our wireless way of life that are designed to destroy the children - especially boys. The powers-that-shouldn't-be do not appreciate male potency as it is a direct threat to their control. Hence, they do everything they can to undermine male power, making up phrases such as "toxic masculinity" and promoting transgenderism and the genital mutilation of children.
It's time for people to see things as they really are. The medical establishment is NOT your friend and this has been so for at least 100 years. Human children have never been this sick or disabled and hence, if we do not change gears very soon, billions of bloodlines will go extinct.
I have two nieces 28 and 19. Both seemed very "normal" as kids. They both started having "unexplained" health issues at 15 and 12. Both now have many health issues AND gender nonconforming. Could be on the spectrum as well? I'm sure their moms were following all ob/gyn and pediatric recommendations. They are the new normal. Every single child injected pre birth or after is injured. You don't need studies to see what is in front of you.
Many autistic girls are undiagnosed. I cannot diagnose anyone, obviously
Please see my comment above Kat Bro, as prenatal exposure to ultrasound (combined with parental use of wireless devices) is also causing massive harm to the children. Radiation damage is often latent -- showing up years after the first exposure. This includes problems like cancers, brain tumors, sterility, etc.
I wonder if all the children and adults in this study had the same immunizations history's from birth prior to parents or children getting the COVID vaccine. Could it be possible that previous vaccines combined with COVID vaccine are causing medical, phycological, and death results in children and adults? This would also account for the all the differences in age groups from very old to very young because vaccines and regiments have changed so much especially since the early 1900's.
Everyone, just remember a set variables in a scientific equation, static and hypothesis is the key to the results you want achieve. If you use the right set variables, you can make an elephant hang from a cliff by blade grass.
Would it have been even worse for the vaxx-exposed cohort of this study if they had been studied at 6 months and 3 months of age? Did more in the vax-exposed group die off in the earlier months, so that only healthier ones were left by 18 months, giving an illusion of benefit at 18 months?
OT, but here's a collection-of-videos post perhaps useful to some of your readers who find it difficult to keep up: https://pomocon.substack.com/p/recent-must-see-vids-on-the-covidvax
If you are interested in this topic I suggest reading the following article...
https://thehighwire.com/editorial/as-cdc-pushed-covid-vaccine-with-no-safety-data-a-new-study-reveals-that-prenatal-exposure-to-the-mrna-jab-causes-autism/
The Highwire has followed this topic more closely then any other news organization or group. I would trust that they will be very honest and thorough in their review of the study. (They put out news every Thursday and it is legit.)
I had a thought while reading this, we have people within society who have no problems killing babies in the womb, are these the same people deciding if the vaccines are safe or not?
I remember being surprised when some of the formulations from doctors looking to diminish the damage from Covid or the shots included drugs to reduce androgens. According to one study done at Columbia University's Institute For Genomic Research, to enter human cells the spike protein binds to two proteins, ACE2 (which I thought was an enzyme?) and TMPRSS2. Lowering testosterone reduces the number of TMPRSS2 receptors. So there may be a gender-associated pathway by which the spike protein affects cells, that disproportionately affects male fetus development.
My understanding is that the Covid vaccine hi-jacks ones immune system and uses up extra hormones, so you have less free testosterone than normal. Adequate hormones are needed for the fetus to develop normally, and I am not surprised that the most damage to the fetus is caused by vaccinations in the first trimester of pregnancy. Pregnant women have reduced immunity, so the hormone deficit caused by vaccinating in the 1st trimester, may continue to impair normal fetal development in 2nd and 3rd trimester. It goes to show how important adequate hormones are in normal development, and this vaccination effect during pregnancy should come as no surprise.
It is very strange about the higher risk in vaccine-exposed at 12 months and the lower risk at 18 months. I'm wondering if these are completely separate groups, or if it is the same group tested six months apart. If it is the same group tested six months apart, is it possible that the worst-affected kids could have died in the interim, or been unable to participate in the testing at 18 months? Of course the study glosses over the biggest and simplest question: how many pregnancies ended up producing alive kids at, say, age 18 months, vaxxed vs unvaxxed.
I do not understand also